similar to: ipv6 routing problem

Hello all I continue fighting with load balancing, I though it was easier :-/ Here is the script with my configuration #!/bin/sh IFI=eth0 IPI=192.168.10.155 NMI=24 IFE1=eth1 IPE1=192.168.1.128 NWE1=192.168.1.0 NME1=24 BRD1=192.168.1.255 GWE1=192.168.1.1 IFE2=eth2 IPE2=192.168.254.128 NWE2=192.168.254.0 NME2=24 BRD2=192.168.254.255 GWE2=192.168.254.254 ip link set $IFI up ip addr add

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

hi i have a strange night with our firewall ;) i wanted to utilize the icmp redirect packages to connect our to different networks on the same segment i have a lot of these messages in dmesg: Redirect from 10.0.0.2 on lo about 152.66.235.1 ignored. Advised path = 0.0.0.0 -> 0.0.0.0, tos 00 --- with tcpdump i saw strange packets crawling on the lo interface ;) IP 10.0.0.2 > 0.0.0.0: icmp

So I do not want to run radvd on my public subnet (between the gateway and firewall). I am trying to set up the firewall's public interface. For now in ifcfg-eth0 I have the lines: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:40:F4:05:A8:F1 IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=no IPV6ADDR="2607:F4B8:3:1:0:40:F405:A8F1" ONBOOT=yes And in network I have: NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes

Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three

Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 20:07:00 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > Hi, > > this commit > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c9d76e2baf653fa5504d6849e5c1aae32eff3c53 > > added code which can not be compiled with uclibc-ng 1.0.26 using buildroot: Hrm... ok. It'll be probably faster for you to try a test build instead of me setting up buildroot... What happens if in

Hi, this commit https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c9d76e2baf653fa5504d6849e5c1aae32eff3c53 added code which can not be compiled with uclibc-ng 1.0.26 using buildroot: make[3]: Entering directory '/home/bernd/buildroot/br4/output/build/dovecot-2.2.33.2/src/lib-test' /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

Rowland, Thank you for all your help, I agree that this is not a Samba issue. Given rhat it works without the firewall. It' either a ufw or Windows 8.1 issue. Louis, Applied the rules you suggested to ufw exactly as written. No change. Still cannot connect with firewall enabled. Same error mesage as before "Cannot mount location ...". ufw log set to medium and copied below.

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761 Summary: Bug in ICMPv6 type and code fields processing Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi, my box is connected to 3 networks, eth0 eth1 wlan0. I want "my" traffic to go via wlan0 and everything from eth1 NATed to eth0: eth0 192.168.1.10/24 eth1 172.16.1.1/12 wlan0 192.168.10.190/24 I first tried this with two single hosts: iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o eth0 -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o wlan0 -t nat echo 200 Forw >>

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742 Summary: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

my program given below can some one make it presentable. I trying to simulate survival data and calculate the power. I think i could have done better. s=10 number=0 count1=0;count2=0;count3=0;count4=0;count5=0;count6=0;count7=0;count8=0; count9=0; count11=0;count22=0;count33=0;count44=0;count55=0;count66=0;count77=0; count88=0;count99=0; while(s!=0){ n=100 n1=n/2 n2=n/4

hi: *I have this 2 boxes set up like this:* 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |=======================| | eth1 | A | | B |---- | | | |

* sorry for the 2 previous schemas, they came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |==================== | | eth1 | A | | B | ---- | |

Hi guys, Last week I've switched from my old & good 3.4.63 to 3.14-rc1 and noticed nasty display corruptions when using nouveau. It seems that changing parts of the screen are appearing for a fraction of second in random places. I've recorded this behavior: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEq7JzGVzj0 My hardware is some old motherboard with 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]:

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+