similar to: [PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 1/2] scripts: Add a script for formatting all C code in the project.

See previous version: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-April/msg00021.html The formatting in this second version isn't too bad. Still a few corner cases to sort out. Rich.

From: Anastasiia Lukianenko <anastasiia_lukianenko at epam.com> We are trying to use the clang-format approach as a base for Xen [1] style formatting. During the state of testing clang-format with different configurations, we found that some points regarding the Xen coding style are not configurable. Therefore, we decided to add them to be able to make a choice in different cases. Regards,

Hi, I am trying to use LLVM on x86 with some code intended for another architecture (IBM Cell). The plan is: 1. foreach $c_files llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -c -o $bc_file $c_file 2. link $bc_files 3. run my passes with 'opt' 4. llc -march=c 5. cell_cc The original code is for the Cell, and uses altivec intrinsics. However, llvm-gcc complains about not recognizing them. I read that

Hi all, I have a working package for linux, including fortran 95 code compiled with g95, that I need to port to OS X. The package works on Linux and seems to load on the Mac, but when I try to run a function that calls C or Fortran I'm told that the symbol is not loaded. I'm developing via a shell account on an OS X system, I don't have access to a desktop. The set up is: R

This works, but there's no time saving and I'm still investigating whether it does what I think it does. Nevertheless I thought I would post it because it (probably) implements the idea I had last night outlined in: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-June/msg00010.html The meat of the change is patch 4. Patch 5 is an example which I would probably fold into patch 4 for

On Apr 5, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Sunjae Park wrote: > Hi, I am trying to use LLVM on x86 with some code intended for another > architecture (IBM Cell). The plan is: > > 1. foreach $c_files > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -c -o $bc_file $c_file > 2. link $bc_files > 3. run my passes with 'opt' > 4. llc -march=c > 5. cell_cc > > The original code is for the Cell, and

With the numbers of patches flying around it can be a bit hard for a maintainer to spot patches which (s)he is expected to comment on / deal with, especially now that we have a larger number of maintainers of varying subsystems etc. I think it might be time to start asking patch submitters to CC the maintainers of the code they are touching, based on the MAINTAINERS file. If people (specifically

James, we are using an *unmodified* llvm-project (master llorg), and just add some extra projects from our internal repos to the top-level. Thanks, Slava From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:19 AM To: Zakharin, Vyacheslav P <vyacheslav.p.zakharin at intel.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC]

Hello, My team is using some non-llvm projects along with llvm-project monorepo. The projects are checked out to the top level of llvm-project, and 'git status' would complain about them unless we add them to .gitignore. We do not really want to change llorg's .gitignore on our side, so may we propose changing llorg's .gitignore to ignore all top-level files/directories that are

Quite a complex fix in the end, see the comment in the second commit. Rich.

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: conntrack-tools 1.2.0 This release is a major milestone that includes support for expectation synchronization and the new nfct utility that, by now, only supports the new cttimeout infrastructure. See ChangeLog that comes attached to this email for more details. You can download it from:

These changes allow virt-v2v to be compiled against the build directory of a non-installed libguestfs. Note that some small changes are also required to common and virt-v2v itself. I will post those separately. Rich.

Hi, Few changes in hivex, sent as series to be clearly identified as hivex ones. After these patches, what about a new release of it? The last one is basically one year old, and the changes after 1.3.11 make hivex build and work fine on FreeBSD (and maybe more non-Linux OSes). Thanks, Pino Toscano (3): Fix shebang in perl scripts Update gnulib to latest. Update .gitignore with more

Hello, I created a Google Group http://groups.google.com/group/web-framework-architecture for discussing platform independent web-framework (or web-server) architectures. Everyone can agree that Rail''s style MVC design is not the end-all web development platform but merely a leap forward in our ideas of how to best work with HTT protocol. With tools like Ruby, Mongrel, and Rack, sitting

Dear all, I have a digg-clone website. However, I want it so that when a user clicks on a link (which links to another website), it opens up the link along with embedded discussion (from my website). This is so that a user can both view the link and also discuss it at the same time. Are there examples of ways of doing this? I am interested in using Ajax or Javascript to do this. I do wish

Since I believe that questions reguarding Linux routing and IPsec are off-topic for this lists, can anyone point me to a good list for these questions? I''m trying to figure out the routing for a network containing a mesh of IPsec tunnels. (We now have almost 40 tunnels.) Thanks, A.

I''ve been happy with radrails (recently merged into aptana) as my windows RoR dev tool. http://radrails.org/download_rails_rdt.php --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

looks ok, but for me, the design could be improved :) For these kind of stuff I use Control.Modal: http://livepipe.net/projects/control_modal/ It doesn''t do automatic "prompt" forms, just modal boxes with whatever you want to add it. Maybe you could use it as the basis of your library. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you

No rocket science on the surface, but there is something slightly clever happening here - note that the green scriptaculous draggables take on a different CSS class or something when they''re moved over the right hand droppable. This warrants a look under the hood ... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Hi Valentine, I am currently trying out your inPlaceEditor and I am happy with so far as it helps with the CMS I am developing in Rails at the moment. However, when you click cancel and go into in-place editing right after again, the textfield does not switch into WYSIWYG mode anymore. That behaviour is correct, because you do not disconnect the editor instance form the DOM tree on cancel.