similar to: [Bug 1479] New: seqnum_to_json() is slow

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1142 Bug ID: 1142 Summary: invalid binop operation 6nft Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1734 Bug ID: 1734 Summary: nft set with auto-merge json import/export Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1728 Bug ID: 1728 Summary: Regression: iptables lock is now waited for without --wait Product: iptables Version: 1.8.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: unknown

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685 Bug ID: 1685 Summary: Calling the nftnl_set_free function may trigger the "double free" problem. Product: libnftnl Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1395 Bug ID: 1395 Summary: Add element fails with Error: Could not process rule: Invalid argument Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft

Two legged 1.4.2 firewall zone nwl is eth0 (192.168.221.0/24 ($FW on .205)) zone jvc is eth1 (10.200.47.0/24 ($FW on .253)) Lets suppose i need to allow traffic from nwl to "jvn" which is 10.200.0.0/16 (yes, i do realize that they overlap) and route that traffic to 10.200.47.254? The router upstream from this one routes 10.200.0.0/16 -> 192.168.221.205 and i do see

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059 Bug ID: 1059 Summary: Using wildcard interface names in an anonymous set fails on big endian Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: ppc OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 Summary: nft configure does not use --prefix as include/lib search path Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=895 Summary: Add a 'ipv6_address' set into a ipv4 table and vice versa Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1099 Bug ID: 1099 Summary: Minor typo in wiki.nftables.org Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481 Bug ID: 1481 Summary: [ebtables-nft] ebtables -E gives error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1391 Bug ID: 1391 Summary: iptables-nft-restore --test can segfault Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1452 Bug ID: 1452 Summary: Incorrect information in the iptables-extensions(8) man page Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692 Bug ID: 1692 Summary: CentOS 7 kernel up to 3.10.0-1160.92.1.el7.x86_64 - nftables hangs the system on set flush Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1083 Bug ID: 1083 Summary: Cannot parse negative priorities from command line Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1210 Bug ID: 1210 Summary: nftables gets confused by user namespaces when meta skuid is used Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=923 Summary: set: It Is not possible invert a set Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1735 Bug ID: 1735 Summary: Adding nftables interval sets progressively gets slower and makes the nft CLI less responsive with each added set Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1074 Bug ID: 1074 Summary: nft-0.{5,6}: configure.ac: Replace automagic dblatex dependency with configure switch Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5