similar to: [PATCH] gpu: drm: virito: code cleanup

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] gpu: drm: virito: code cleanup"

2018 Apr 23
3
[PATCH] gpu: drm: qxl: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:08:44PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For > now, this is just documenting that the function returns > a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances > are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type. > > Reference id -> 1c8f422059ae ("mm: change return type to >
2018 Apr 23
3
[PATCH] gpu: drm: qxl: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:08:44PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For > now, this is just documenting that the function returns > a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances > are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type. > > Reference id -> 1c8f422059ae ("mm: change return type to >
2018 Apr 24
0
[PATCH] gpu: drm: qxl: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:49:24PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:08:44PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For > > now, this is just documenting that the function returns > > a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances > > are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type.
2020 May 01
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dispnv04: Remove dead code
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:21 AM Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > Interesting. I do remember seeing some snow on NV5's overlay at high > resolutions. Wonder if it was because of this missing code... What was the problem ? Does enabling this dead code will fix the problem ? > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:19 PM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com>
2019 May 27
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/svm: Convert to use hmm_range_fault()
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:27 AM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > > Convert to use hmm_range_fault(). Any comment on this patch ? > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git
2019 Jun 07
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/svm: Convert to use hmm_range_fault()
Hi Jason, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:27 AM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > > Convert to use hmm_range_fault(). > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> Would you like to take it through your new hmm tree or do I need to resend it ? > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
2020 Apr 30
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dispnv04: Remove dead code
Interesting. I do remember seeing some snow on NV5's overlay at high resolutions. Wonder if it was because of this missing code... On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:19 PM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > > These are dead code since 3.10. If there is no plan to use > it further, these can be removed forever. > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at
2019 May 20
3
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/svm: Convert to use hmm_range_fault()
Convert to use hmm_range_fault(). Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c index 93ed43c..8d56bd6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c +++
2020 Jun 09
1
[PATCH v2] mm/balloon_compaction: Fix trivial spelling
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:04 PM Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas at ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > The word 'descriptor' is misspelled throughout the tree. I think, *throughout the tree* is not appropriate* here. This patch has fixed it within the file. With that, Acked-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> > > Fix it up accordingly: >
2020 Apr 30
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dispnv04: Remove dead code
These are dead code since 3.10. If there is no plan to use it further, these can be removed forever. Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 28 ---------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c index 1f08de4..ad0ef7d
2019 Jul 23
0
[PATCH 1/6] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault, snapshot}
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:07:33PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:14 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > > > We should not have two different error codes for the same condition. In > > addition this really complicates the code due to the special handling of > > EAGAIN that drops the mmap_sem due to the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY
2019 Mar 07
0
[RFC PATCH V2 4/5] vhost: introduce helpers to get the size of metadata area
On 2019/3/7 ??2:43, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Is the change log left with any particular reason ? Nope, will add the log. Thanks >> --- >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> 1
2007 Jan 31
0
[patch] readnotes fix
Hi, Fix tyops which breaks transparent gunzipping ... please apply, Gerd -- Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2015 Jan 19
3
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Hi, > BTW: is there a tool (or pciutils patch) which can decode the virtio > capabilities? Searched for a patch today, and all google found me was this mail asking for one :-o So I went ahead and coded one up. Attached. While hacking it up I've noticed spec doesn't match reality. The "Virtio Structure PCI Capabilities" section here ...
2015 Jan 19
3
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Hi, > BTW: is there a tool (or pciutils patch) which can decode the virtio > capabilities? Searched for a patch today, and all google found me was this mail asking for one :-o So I went ahead and coded one up. Attached. While hacking it up I've noticed spec doesn't match reality. The "Virtio Structure PCI Capabilities" section here ...
2018 May 23
0
[RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
subj: s/virito/virtio/ On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:03:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This adds a hook which a platform can define in order to allow it to > force the use of the DMA API for all virtio devices even if they don't > have the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag set. We want to use this to do > bounce-buffering of data on the new secure pSeries platform, currently >
2018 Jul 23
0
[RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On 07/20/2018 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:41AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for >> virito devices > > s/virito/virtio/ Oops, will fix it. Thanks for pointing out. > >> This adds a hook which a platform can define in order to allow it to >>
2016 May 27
2
[PATCH v3 7/7] [wip] virtio-gpu: add page flip support
On Mi, 2016-05-25 at 18:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> > > So I entirely missed this, but this isn't really how to implement > page_flip for an atomic driver. Working on some stuff and will hack up > a likely totally broken
2016 May 27
2
[PATCH v3 7/7] [wip] virtio-gpu: add page flip support
On Mi, 2016-05-25 at 18:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> > > So I entirely missed this, but this isn't really how to implement > page_flip for an atomic driver. Working on some stuff and will hack up > a likely totally broken
2006 Jan 26
1
Ext3 filesystem access after downgrade from v4.2 to v3.6 [SOLVED]
Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on