Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-Jul-20 13:15 UTC
[RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:41AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:>Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for > virito devicess/virito/virtio/> This adds a hook which a platform can define in order to allow it to > override virtio device's DMA OPS irrespective of whether it has the > flag VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM set or not. We want to use this to do > bounce-buffering of data on the new secure pSeries platform, currently > under development, where a KVM host cannot access all of the memory > space of a secure KVM guest. The host can only access the pages which > the guest has explicitly requested to be shared with the host, thus > the virtio implementation in the guest has to copy data to and from > shared pages. > > With this hook, the platform code in the secure guest can force the > use of swiotlb for virtio buffers, with a back-end for swiotlb which > will use a pool of pre-allocated shared pages. Thus all data being > sent or received by virtio devices will be copied through pages which > the host has access to. > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++++ > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 6 ++++++ > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > index 8fa3945..bc5a9d3 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > @@ -116,3 +116,9 @@ extern u64 __dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev); > > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > #endif /* _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */ > + > +#define platform_override_dma_ops platform_override_dma_ops > + > +struct virtio_device; > + > +extern void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > index 06f0296..5773bc7 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/iommu.h> > #include <linux/rculist.h> > +#include <linux/virtio.h> > #include <asm/io.h> > #include <asm/prom.h> > #include <asm/rtas.h> > @@ -1396,3 +1397,8 @@ static int __init disable_multitce(char *str) > __setup("multitce=", disable_multitce); > > machine_subsys_initcall_sync(pseries, tce_iommu_bus_notifier_init); > + > +void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +{ > + /* Override vdev->parent.dma_ops if required */ > +} > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > index 6b13987..432c332 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_add_status); > > const struct dma_map_ops virtio_direct_dma_ops; > > +#ifndef platform_override_dma_ops > +static inline void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +{ > +} > +#endif > + > int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) > { > int ret = dev->config->finalize_features(dev); > @@ -179,6 +185,7 @@ int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) > if (virtio_has_iommu_quirk(dev)) > set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); > > + platform_override_dma_ops(dev);Is there a single place where virtio_has_iommu_quirk is called now? If so, we could put this into virtio_has_iommu_quirk then.> if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) > return 0; > > -- > 2.9.3
Anshuman Khandual
2018-Jul-23 02:16 UTC
[RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On 07/20/2018 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:41AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for >> virito devices > > s/virito/virtio/Oops, will fix it. Thanks for pointing out.> >> This adds a hook which a platform can define in order to allow it to >> override virtio device's DMA OPS irrespective of whether it has the >> flag VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM set or not. We want to use this to do >> bounce-buffering of data on the new secure pSeries platform, currently >> under development, where a KVM host cannot access all of the memory >> space of a secure KVM guest. The host can only access the pages which >> the guest has explicitly requested to be shared with the host, thus >> the virtio implementation in the guest has to copy data to and from >> shared pages. >> >> With this hook, the platform code in the secure guest can force the >> use of swiotlb for virtio buffers, with a back-end for swiotlb which >> will use a pool of pre-allocated shared pages. Thus all data being >> sent or received by virtio devices will be copied through pages which >> the host has access to. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++++ >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 6 ++++++ >> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ >> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >> index 8fa3945..bc5a9d3 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >> @@ -116,3 +116,9 @@ extern u64 __dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev); >> >> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ >> #endif /* _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */ >> + >> +#define platform_override_dma_ops platform_override_dma_ops >> + >> +struct virtio_device; >> + >> +extern void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev); >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >> index 06f0296..5773bc7 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ >> #include <linux/of.h> >> #include <linux/iommu.h> >> #include <linux/rculist.h> >> +#include <linux/virtio.h> >> #include <asm/io.h> >> #include <asm/prom.h> >> #include <asm/rtas.h> >> @@ -1396,3 +1397,8 @@ static int __init disable_multitce(char *str) >> __setup("multitce=", disable_multitce); >> >> machine_subsys_initcall_sync(pseries, tce_iommu_bus_notifier_init); >> + >> +void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> +{ >> + /* Override vdev->parent.dma_ops if required */ >> +} >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> index 6b13987..432c332 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_add_status); >> >> const struct dma_map_ops virtio_direct_dma_ops; >> >> +#ifndef platform_override_dma_ops >> +static inline void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> +{ >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) >> { >> int ret = dev->config->finalize_features(dev); >> @@ -179,6 +185,7 @@ int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) >> if (virtio_has_iommu_quirk(dev)) >> set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); >> >> + platform_override_dma_ops(dev); > > Is there a single place where virtio_has_iommu_quirk is called now?Not other than this one. But in the proposed implementation of platform_override_dma_ops on powerpc, we will again check on virtio_has_iommu_quirk before overriding it with SWIOTLB. void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) { if (is_ultravisor_platform() && virtio_has_iommu_quirk(vdev)) set_dma_ops(vdev->dev.parent, &swiotlb_dma_ops); }> If so, we could put this into virtio_has_iommu_quirk then.Did you mean platform_override_dma_ops instead ? If so, yes that is possible. Default implementation of platform_override_dma_ops should just check on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature and override with virtio_direct_dma_ops but arch implementation can check on what ever else they would like and override appropriately. Default platform_override_dma_ops will be like this #ifndef platform_override_dma_ops static inline void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) { if(!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); } #endif Proposed powerpc implementation will be like this instead void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) { if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) return; if (is_ultravisor_platform()) set_dma_ops(vdev->dev.parent, &swiotlb_dma_ops); else set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); } There is a redundant definition of virtio_has_iommu_quirk in the tools directory (tools/virtio/linux/virtio_config.h) which does not seem to be used any where. I guess that can be removed without problem.
Anshuman Khandual
2018-Jul-25 04:30 UTC
[RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On 07/23/2018 07:46 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:> On 07/20/2018 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:41AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for >>> virito devices >> >> s/virito/virtio/ > > Oops, will fix it. Thanks for pointing out. > >> >>> This adds a hook which a platform can define in order to allow it to >>> override virtio device's DMA OPS irrespective of whether it has the >>> flag VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM set or not. We want to use this to do >>> bounce-buffering of data on the new secure pSeries platform, currently >>> under development, where a KVM host cannot access all of the memory >>> space of a secure KVM guest. The host can only access the pages which >>> the guest has explicitly requested to be shared with the host, thus >>> the virtio implementation in the guest has to copy data to and from >>> shared pages. >>> >>> With this hook, the platform code in the secure guest can force the >>> use of swiotlb for virtio buffers, with a back-end for swiotlb which >>> will use a pool of pre-allocated shared pages. Thus all data being >>> sent or received by virtio devices will be copied through pages which >>> the host has access to. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++++ >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 6 ++++++ >>> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >>> index 8fa3945..bc5a9d3 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >>> @@ -116,3 +116,9 @@ extern u64 __dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev); >>> >>> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ >>> #endif /* _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */ >>> + >>> +#define platform_override_dma_ops platform_override_dma_ops >>> + >>> +struct virtio_device; >>> + >>> +extern void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev); >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >>> index 06f0296..5773bc7 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c >>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ >>> #include <linux/of.h> >>> #include <linux/iommu.h> >>> #include <linux/rculist.h> >>> +#include <linux/virtio.h> >>> #include <asm/io.h> >>> #include <asm/prom.h> >>> #include <asm/rtas.h> >>> @@ -1396,3 +1397,8 @@ static int __init disable_multitce(char *str) >>> __setup("multitce=", disable_multitce); >>> >>> machine_subsys_initcall_sync(pseries, tce_iommu_bus_notifier_init); >>> + >>> +void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>> +{ >>> + /* Override vdev->parent.dma_ops if required */ >>> +} >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >>> index 6b13987..432c332 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >>> @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_add_status); >>> >>> const struct dma_map_ops virtio_direct_dma_ops; >>> >>> +#ifndef platform_override_dma_ops >>> +static inline void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>> +{ >>> +} >>> +#endif >>> + >>> int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) >>> { >>> int ret = dev->config->finalize_features(dev); >>> @@ -179,6 +185,7 @@ int virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *dev) >>> if (virtio_has_iommu_quirk(dev)) >>> set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); >>> >>> + platform_override_dma_ops(dev); >> >> Is there a single place where virtio_has_iommu_quirk is called now? > > Not other than this one. But in the proposed implementation of > platform_override_dma_ops on powerpc, we will again check on > virtio_has_iommu_quirk before overriding it with SWIOTLB. > > void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > if (is_ultravisor_platform() && virtio_has_iommu_quirk(vdev)) > set_dma_ops(vdev->dev.parent, &swiotlb_dma_ops); > } > >> If so, we could put this into virtio_has_iommu_quirk then. > > Did you mean platform_override_dma_ops instead ? If so, yes that > is possible. Default implementation of platform_override_dma_ops > should just check on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature and override > with virtio_direct_dma_ops but arch implementation can check on > what ever else they would like and override appropriately. > > Default platform_override_dma_ops will be like this > > #ifndef platform_override_dma_ops > static inline void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > if(!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) > set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); > } > #endif > > Proposed powerpc implementation will be like this instead > > void platform_override_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) > return; > > if (is_ultravisor_platform()) > set_dma_ops(vdev->dev.parent, &swiotlb_dma_ops); > else > set_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, &virtio_direct_dma_ops); > > } > > There is a redundant definition of virtio_has_iommu_quirk in the tools > directory (tools/virtio/linux/virtio_config.h) which does not seem to > be used any where. I guess that can be removed without problem.Does this sound okay ? It will merge patch 3 and 4 into a single one. On the other hand it also passes the responsibility of dealing with VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag to the architecture callback which might be bit problematic. Keeping VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM handling in virtio core at least makes sure that the device has a working DMA ops to fall back on if the arch hook fails to take care of it somehow.
Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-Jul-25 13:31 UTC
[RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:46:09AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:> There is a redundant definition of virtio_has_iommu_quirk in the tools > directory (tools/virtio/linux/virtio_config.h) which does not seem to > be used any where. I guess that can be removed without problem.It's there just to make tools/virtio build. Try make -C tools/virtio/ In fact I see there's a missing definition for dma_rmb/dma_wmb there, I'll post a patch. -- MST
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
- [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
- [RFC 4/4] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
- [RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
- [RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices