similar to: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?

Thank you Guillermo. I will give it a go and revert back with my results. Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Guillermo Bisheimer < gbisheimer at bys-control.com.ar> wrote: > Hi Yazeed, > > You have to add this to tinc.conf > > TunnelServer = yes > > Otherwise tinc will manage package routing internally. Then you

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:14 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:43:50 +0200 > > The local variable "err" will be set to an appropriate value > by a following statement. > Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. > >

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:14 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:43:50 +0200 > > The local variable "err" will be set to an appropriate value > by a following statement. > Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. > >

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:15 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:56 +0200 > > Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention. I think you mean "goto label". "Jump label" has a different meaning, see

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:15 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:56 +0200 > > Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention. I think you mean "goto label". "Jump label" has a different meaning, see

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:12 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:32:22 +0200 > > Multiplications for the size determination of memory allocations > indicated that array data structures should be processed. > Thus use the corresponding function

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:12 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:32:22 +0200 > > Multiplications for the size determination of memory allocations > indicated that array data structures should be processed. > Thus use the corresponding function

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:15:20PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:56 +0200 > > Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> Please don't send me such patches, I'm not

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:15:20PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:56 +0200 > > Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> Please don't send me such patches, I'm not

I've recently built a docker container to easily install and configure tinc 1.1pre14 in any machine using docker containers. I've created a Github repo in https://github.com/bys-control/docker-tinc I'm working in a WEB based admin interface for managing tinc daemons. Right now it's just a JSON API for tinc, but I'm working in developing the front end. Any

Hi Guillermo, Yes, I've also noticed there are still issues with resuming from standby on Windows, despite the latest fixes that I wrote (which are included in 1.1pre15). I think my fixes covered some of the causes of tinc misbehaving on standby, but not all of them. Are you able to reproduce the issue reliably? If so, can you please file an issue at https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues

Hi Guillermo, Yes, I've also noticed there are still issues with resuming from standby on Windows, despite the latest fixes that I wrote (which are included in 1.1pre15). I think my fixes covered some of the causes of tinc misbehaving on standby, but not all of them. Are you able to reproduce the issue reliably? If so, can you please file an issue at https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues

I'm using Tinc 1.1pre14 and I'm trying to connect a node that is behind a firewall that blocks all non-standard ports. I set up a rule in the server to redirect port 25 (that is not used in the server right now) to port 655, both in tcp and udp protocols, and set up the port 25 in the server host configuration file. The client can reach the server, but after the initial sync and key

Thanks for the update! I've been testing Tinc 1.1pre14 for a while in linux and windows, and it's working very well. But I'm having some trouble with Windows machines (mostly Win8 and Win10) when resuming from suspended state or hibernation the tinc daemon just stop responding. I have to shut down the process and start it back up to be able to connect to the VPN. The first line on

Thanks for the update! I've been testing Tinc 1.1pre14 for a while in linux and windows, and it's working very well. But I'm having some trouble with Windows machines (mostly Win8 and Win10) when resuming from suspended state or hibernation the tinc daemon just stop responding. I have to shut down the process and start it back up to be able to connect to the VPN. The first line on

Hi to all. I'm experimenting with tinc 1.1 using ubuntu and I need to generate a .deb package to be able to install latest 1.1pre14 version in ubuntu. I found the .deb package for debian in the experimental repositories, but couldn't find the same for ubuntu and wish to build the package myself. I'm able to compile and install Tinc from sources on ubuntu, but never created deb

Hi I have a simple hub and spoke topology where all my nodes connect to a central node. Below is tinc.conf for main node *tinc.conf* Name = main Interface = tun0 Forwarding = kernel and the remote nodes have same with ConnectTo = main. I have tried to apply a basic iptable policy on the main node but the traffic still seems to passthough and the nodes can communicate with each other. How do I

Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos

Hi Yazeed, You have to add this to tinc.conf TunnelServer = yes Otherwise tinc will manage package routing internally. Then you can manage forwarding rules using IPTABLES as usual. Hope it helps. El lun., 13 feb. 2017 a las 8:11, Yazeed Fataar (<yazeedfataar at gmail.com>) escribió: Hi I have a simple hub and spoke topology where all my nodes connect to a central node. Below is

Hi everybody. Just wanted to mention that I've published a docker image of tinc 1.1pre15 for the raspberry pi 2/3. It was compiled from source on a raspberry 3 and published as byscontrol/tinc-rpi <https://hub.docker.com/r/byscontrol/tinc-rpi/> along witht the configuration instructions. The latest tag refers to 1.1pre15 only, but I can publish other versions as well if needed. Hope