Virtualization - Oct 2016 - [PATCH 4/4] virtio_blk: Rename a jump label in virtblk_get_id()

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:15:20PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:56 +0200
> 
> Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
Please don't send me such patches, I'm not really
interested in renaming labels unless it clearly adds
to a significant improvement in readability.
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 696f452..fef2bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -247,10 +247,10 @@ static int virtblk_get_id(struct gendisk *disk, char
*id_str)
>  
>  	err = blk_rq_map_kern(q, req, id_str, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto put_request;
>  
>  	err = blk_execute_rq(vblk->disk->queue, vblk->disk, req, false);
> -out:
> + put_request:
>  	blk_put_request(req);
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.10.0

> Please don't send me such patches, I'm not really interested in
renaming labels
Thanks for your feedback.

> unless it clearly adds to a significant improvement in readability.
Have you got any more concrete conditions for the selection of appropriate
identifiers in this use case according to your software development view?

Regards,
Markus