similar to: List Adminstration Help

I would just like to get a refresh of the situation for Australian users. It would seem that the TE400P is currently available and is likely to acheive approval for use in Australia within the next 2 months ? (when is the end of summer?). Once this is done, it will certainly suit larger installations, but it still leaves a number of 'gaps'. Anyone with analog phone lines will need

On 22 May 2016 07:01, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 5/21/2016 6:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> i started to look at SCL and got lost pretty quickly. I'm not running OwnCloud but I've got some other php stuff thats getting increasingly unhappy about the stock c6 php... > > > ok, I've installed

Does anyone know if their are rules that this list is supposed to be following? It doesn't appear to be moderated, so I realize that such rules would be self-enforced, but it still might be good to agree on some. Likewise, we could agree on none. That works also. Any thoughts? Some suggestions: 1) Be polite at all times. Imagine your grandmother reads this list. 2) If you can't be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 To all list subscribers: This list now requires that all posts be approved by a moderator including those appearing to come from a *@samba.org address. This will prevent situations such as occurred yesterday when an email worm forged a samba.org address (my own) and bounces began filtering back through the samba-announce list. We apologize for the

oh also would like to add that in the past when i post to a moderated list i usually receive an email explaining such, and offering me the opportunity to cancel the message by visiting a special URL (i think, or replying to the message e.g.) or wait for it to be approved. since i didn't receive any such email, i figured the duplicate posts were silently rejected.

In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated. I certainly don't have time to moderate the list myself, so I would suggest giving at least a half dozen, maybe more, people the ability to approve posts to keep it flowing quickly. Moderators would be asked just to approve/disapprove based upon a

I've been away from this list but reentered recently. Now when I send a question I get an automated answer saying: ------- Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject .............. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post to moderated list ------- Is this the new style of the list? G?ran

All, This list is a "Members Only" posting list ... this is good because it prevents us from getting hundreds of Viagra commercials and such. You can only post to the list with the e-mail address that you subscribed with. If you post from another e-mail address, it will tell you that "Your post needs to be approved by a Moderator." I just want to tell everyone that I

I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list

I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list

Hi everyone, I try to add many vectors (L1,L2,L3....) to multiple list objects (a.list, b.list....) in a workspace. Somethings like below, but it is not working. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Best, John lf=ls(pattern=".lst")  for (x in listfiles) {     dat=read.delim(x,header=F)     for (i in lf) {     assign(i$add,as.numeric(dat[,3]))   #or i$add=as.numeric(dat[,3]    

Have read the comments about Shorewall not being a personal firewall, etc., and am not necessarily advocating such use, but, trying to get into the poster''s head, and doing some creative thinking, thought that possibly some form of EGID rule might help out if there is a reasonable reason behind the question. It is not hard for me to see how something like this could be useful.

On Fri, November 3, 2017 3:01 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri Galtsev >> Sent: den 2 november 2017 15:21 >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? >> On Thu, November 2, 2017 8:29 am, Sorin Srbu wrote:

Dear All, Are people setting the "moderated" bit on their subscriptions to llvm-commits? I'm seeing several people who are subscribed but have their moderated bit set, and so I keep seeing emails seeing that I need to approve their posts. -- John T.

For several years, this list has been moderated for non-member posts. I''ve found that this is a pain for me (I have to wade through the spam to find and approve legitimate posts). Additionally, non-members seem to almost universally ignore instructions to mention that they are non-members in their post. Since the mailing list is set up so that replies go to the list rather than to the

Mails to chrisw at sous-sol.org are not deliverable since several months. Drop him as PARAVIRT_OPS maintainer. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d85c08956875..af0cb69f6a3e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -10179,7 +10179,6 @@ F: Documentation/parport*.txt

Mails to chrisw at sous-sol.org are not deliverable since several months. Drop him as PARAVIRT_OPS maintainer. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d85c08956875..af0cb69f6a3e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -10179,7 +10179,6 @@ F: Documentation/parport*.txt

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 19:32, Hubert Tong via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There seems to be a split between those who prefer to curate commits >> locally and present them in the PR (i.e. Method 3) as they are to be >> committed (i.e. squash/amend/etc from my workstation and push the result), >> and those who seem to feel that it is better to avoid

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > Are people setting the "moderated" bit on their subscriptions to > llvm-commits?  I'm seeing several people who are subscribed but have > their moderated bit set, and so I keep seeing emails seeing that I need > to approve their posts. I think I'm one of such

Given all the discussion, let's just require NO_HZ when CONFIG_PARAVIRT. Anyone object? Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> --- --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Mon Mar 12 11:07:45 2007 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Mon Mar 12 16:53:14 2007 -0700 @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ endchoice config PARAVIRT bool "Paravirtualization support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL