similar to: [tftp-hpa] [PATCH] support for named pipes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[tftp-hpa] [PATCH] support for named pipes"

2017 Jan 10
0
(no subject)
-- Mathias Radtke --- http://uib.de/de/support-schulung/schulung/ --- uib gmbh Bonifaziusplatz 1B 55118 Mainz Tel. 06131 / 27561-16 <phone:061312756116> Fax 06131 / 27561-22 <phone:061312756122> E-Mail: m.radtke at uib.de Internet: www.uib.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: dr. detlef oertel & erol ueluekmen Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB 6942
2008 Feb 21
5
pxelinux fails to load miniroot completly
Hello, we have the following problem: - a new Dell Optiplex 740 boots pxelinux.0 - loads the kernel - start to load the miniroot.gz and crashs after loading about 1/5 of the miniroot The tftpd messages are: Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2070 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006
2015 Sep 21
0
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: > On 21.09.2015 12:06, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: >>> The used TFTPD works fine with BIOS machines. >>> I have two Initrd images. One is 64bit and almost 90MB and the 32bit is >>> 85MB.
2015 Sep 21
4
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On 21.09.2015 12:06, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: >> >> On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or >>> you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. >>> Consider HTTP as it should be more capable
2015 Sep 21
2
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: > 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or > you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. > Consider HTTP as it should be more capable and much faster. The used TFTPD works fine with BIOS machines. I have two Initrd images. One is 64bit and almost 90MB and the 32bit is 85MB. I know that some tftpd
2015 Sep 18
2
Problem with 90MB Initrd
Hi, I am currently trying to replace our companies elilo UEFI PXE boot with syslinux. I compiled all the needed files and the DHCP distributes them fine to the requesting client. However when I try to boot our companies miniroot the DHCP serves the file, but it seems like it never finishes. The image is generated with the following command: find . | grep -v 'name'.bz2 | cpio -o -H newc
2015 Sep 21
2
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On 21.09.2015 13:32, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > What do you observe? Does it transfer the file then the Linux kernel > > crashes? Does it spontaneously reboot before completing the > > operation? > The client is a VSphere VM Client. It displayes the IP Address and > then: > Loading Kernel..... ok > Loading initrd.bz2... > > This stalls for
2001 Aug 13
0
(no subject)
>From nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Wed Jan 31 09:21:55 2001 >Return-Path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net> Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-outbound.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.194]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id JAA03106 for <jareth@camelot.co.jp>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:21:53 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning:
2000 Aug 07
0
ssh startup fails
Hello all :) While trying to bind to 0.0.0.0 having lo0, eth0 and ippp0 up no matter whether on- or offline, i get this: sshd[4518]: error: getnameinfo failed sshd[4518]: fatal: Cannot bind any address. It seems sshd tries to get reverse-resolved the ippp0's address. Is there a configuraiotn fault on my behalf? Did i misunderstand the way sshd works? Shouldn't sshd rather not rely on
2015 Sep 21
0
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: > > > On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or >> you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. >> Consider HTTP as it should be more capable and much faster. > > The used TFTPD works
2001 Aug 13
0
(no subject)
>From nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Feb 1 03:51:36 2001 >Return-Path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net> Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-outbound.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.194]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id DAA11596 for <jareth@camelot.co.jp>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 03:51:35 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning:
2009 Aug 31
2
Samba wants "chdir"
Hallo, one of my colleagues has problems with Samba (V 3.0.32). Samba runs on a Linux server (Slackware 2.6.29.6), some clients are attached via a Windows Terminalserver. Wiederum war auf dem Windows-TS 1(!) User in die Arktur3.6 -Dom?ne f?r ca 20 Minuten angemeldet und hat dabei ca 4400 Meldungen in die /var/log/messages geschrieben. Diese beginnen mit: (my bad translation: 1 client was
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-patches-3.0.2 duplicate hunk
HI, patches/xattrs.diff repeats the man-page change from patches/slp.diff producing an error if you try to apply both patches. -- with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen), Ruediger Oertel (ro@novell.com,ro@suse.de,bugfinder@t-online.de) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Linux Fatou 2.6.25-rc8-12-default #1 SMP 2008-04-02 01:36:51 +0200 x86_64 Key
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-3.0.2 fails testsuite in itemize
HI, rsync-3.0.2 with patches/acls.diff,patches/xattrs.diff,patches/slp.diff fails (most of the time) in the itemize test: ----- itemize log follows Testing for symlinks using 'test -h' makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/foo makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/bar/baz cd+++++++++ ./ cd+++++++++ bar/
2002 Oct 09
2
rsync-2.5.5 memory eater problem
Hi, we ran into a little problem with rsync-2.5.5. Setup: you run rsync-2.5.5 as normal rsync over ssh (ie. not connecting to a rsync server). If you start such a rsync but interrupt the pulling process with Ctrl-C, the process on the other side may start to allocate all memory on the remote machine. As fa as we have analyzed the problem, the remote rsync process wants to issue a error message
1999 Jan 19
0
Samba vs. Paradox
Hello list, i have problems using paradox tables (Paradox Level 5) via BDE (4.01 and 3.02) on my linux server, but their performance is very slow. At current, i'm using Samba 1.9.17p2 (and yes, i know this is not the current version, upgrad is planned). The configuration is very passive (locking for multiuser access to tables, direct write to disk). Does anybody have a suggestion on how
2008 Jul 25
0
glht after lmer with "$S4class-" and "missing model.matrix-" errors with DATA
maybe it's in the data? So here it comes. > sv.growth Grouped Data: length ~ meas | box_id meas spec comp water box_id sprouts leaves length long.sprout 1 1 Sv control moist 1 8.800000 37.80 211.2000 60.6 2 1 Sv xfull moist 2 7.000000 8.00 174.8000 62.8 3 1 Sv control moist 3 9.000000
2011 Sep 29
0
CentOS domU hangs on "Restarting system" - didn't you have that one, too?
Hi, I''m still trying to pin down one of the last issues on some systems here. I''m interested for input from people who *recognize* the following: Sending all processes the TERM signal... [ OK ] Sending all processes the KILL signal... [ OK ] Saving random seed: [ OK ] Syncing hardware clock to system time [FAILED] Turning off swap:
2006 Nov 07
1
pxelinux problem with HP xw4300
Hello, we have a problem with pxelinux and a specific hardware. In short: PXE starts, get and start the pxelinux.0 but can't get the configuration file. This problem belongs only to one new client. Other clients work in this environment with out any problem. The client is a HP xw4300 with the networkcard: ------------ vendor = "Broadcom Corporation" name = "NetXtreme BCM5752
2015 Sep 18
0
Problem with 90MB Initrd
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Mathias Radtke via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am currently trying to replace our companies elilo UEFI PXE boot with > syslinux. > I compiled all the needed files and the DHCP distributes them fine to the > requesting client. > > However when I try to boot our companies miniroot the DHCP serves the file, > but it