similar to: sftp client: upload from pipe

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "sftp client: upload from pipe"

2002 Feb 06
2
SFTP Status Bar..
This is the LAST version I plan on doing.. If I hear no feed back good or bad. Then I'll assume I've wasted my time on a feature that people whine about but don't care to try. This is against 3.0.2pX so it should be VERY easy for anyone to test. - Ben diff -ur openssh-3.0.2p1/misc.c openssh/misc.c --- openssh-3.0.2p1/misc.c Tue Jul 3 23:46:58 2001 +++ openssh/misc.c Wed Feb 6
2003 Oct 30
2
sftp client reget reput
we have implemented this function for 3.1p1, and have been using it in production sense may 2002. The patch has been ported to 3.7.1p2, we have been using it in 3.7.1p2 for awhile, if anyone is interested, here it is. This is the same patch David Bradford talked about on 2002-06-05 Regards, Greg Hayes diff -u -r openssh-3.7.1p2/sftp-client.c openssh-3.7.1p2_sftp/sftp-client.c ---
2002 Feb 02
0
Version two of progressbar for scp/sftp
Again, this has been lightly tested. I think there still are a few glitchs. 1. stole progressmeter() from scp.c - clean up and simplified a little to remove the 'flag' status. It now understands how to initialize itself and how to terminate itself. Along with a malloced status bar instead of the original fix width bar. 2. removed all initialization code from scp.c for progressmeter()
2002 Nov 05
2
[PATCH] fix sftp to preserve permissions and uid/gid
Sftp fails to correctly preserve permissions when fetching a file. It adds write permission for the owner (presumably so it can write the file). Sftp also fails to preserve the uid/gid. Added code so that if is running as root, uid and gid are preserved. patch is based on Openssh 3.4p1. *** sftp-client.c@@\main\1 Tue Oct 1 17:26:20 2002 --- sftp-client.c Tue Nov 5 10:22:52 2002
2002 Jan 30
1
Quick sftp status indicator.
I think my first send was eaten by elm.. Yuck I hate this programm.. Anyawys, first the disclaimer: This is barely tests, I submit this to the general population, but I will not submit this for review of rest of the OpenSSH team. Mainly because it is horrible at best. dealing with alarm() in a sane way is not fun. It does not compile clean, but works. IF anyone cares to clean it up..
2013 Jan 12
1
[Bug 2021] sftp resume support (using size and offset)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 --- Comment #10 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> --- ping :-) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
2001 Sep 10
0
[PATCH] quick hack for 'resume' support in sftp
I saw several questions regarding 'resume transfer' support in sftp come up, in the archives, but no real satisfying answer. I had a particular itch myself, so I scratched it with a quick hack. Patch attached, since it's not really big. To explain, I need to use ssh (scp or sftp) to transfer files to and from a Windows box. No other method is available. And the Windows machine has no
2013 Jun 19
9
[Bug 2021] sftp resume support (using size and offset)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2199|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Loganaden Velvindron
2002 Jan 06
3
sftp/scp performance testing
Folks, I've noticed poor performance using sftp. If anyone has any advice on how to improve performance, I'd like to hear it. Test simply involved transferring a single 143MB MP3 file using defaults for all the program configs. The opensshd 3.0.2p1 server is used in all tests. Software: openssh suite 3.0.2p1 psftp (putty sftp client) latest dev snapshot pscp (putty scp client) latest
2002 Jan 03
3
[PATCH] Improving sftp client performance
The included patch for openssh 3.0.2p1 implements overlapping read requests for the sftp client. It should be able to handle weird cases such as shriking files and reordered responses. This is only the first shot, and I'd be happy for any comments. I plan to implement something similar for the write path if this works out well. The maximum number of outstanding requests is quite high at
2013 Nov 30
4
[Bug 2176] New: unchecked returned value from ftruncate
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2176 Bug ID: 2176 Summary: unchecked returned value from ftruncate Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2019 Jun 22
2
sftp client: upload from pipe
Damien Miller wrote: > IIRC it's there because reads on named pipes can hang if nothing is > attached to them And what is the problem with that? It should break nothing if this named pipe was passed to sftp explicitly (I'm not talking about recursively uploading of directory that contains named pipes). Besides, there is O_NONBLOCK if it would be very necessary. > and because
2003 Oct 01
1
3.7.1p2 sftp recurse patch
This patch is against OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 sources. It adds recursive (directory) downloading and uploading. Criticism/suggestions welcome. I would imagine the time official support is added, recursive operations will be handled on a per-command basis as a flag as opposed to a global toggle command (such as get -r)? diff -ru openssh-3.7.1p2/sftp-int.c openssh-3.7.1p2-patched/sftp-int.c ---
2013 Nov 12
3
[Bug 2171] New: potential fd leak
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2171 Bug ID: 2171 Summary: potential fd leak Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 Jan 22
3
[Bug 1252] sftp returns 0 when upload is unsuccessful due to a full device
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1232| |ok? Flag| | ------- Comment #1 from djm at mindrot.org 2007-01-22 18:03 ------- Created an
2002 Nov 05
0
[PATCH] Add getlink command to sftp
One of the features missing in sftp is the ability to transfer a symlink. This patch adds a new command to sftp which performs this transfer. Note that it uses messages that already exist in the protocol between client and server. This diff is based on OpenSSH 3.4p1. *** sftp-client.c@@\main\1 Tue Oct 1 17:26:20 2002 --- sftp-client.c Wed Oct 23 15:57:34 2002 *************** *** 666,672 ****
2004 Mar 03
1
BUG: SFTP (openssh-3.8p1) upload doubles "Uploading..." comment
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Job 317 wrote: > Sorry, wasn't sure how to describe this well in the Subject line... > > I am using OpenSSH-3.8p1 from a RedHat 7.3 to OpenSSH-3.8p1 on a RedHat > 9.0 box. While SFTP-ing using the 'put *' command in SFTP, I get > duplicate verbosity (?) in the terminal for each file uploaded... You have found a bug, thanks. Here is a patch:
2007 May 14
0
[PATCH] Adds support for Append command (SSH_FXF_APPEND) to sftp_client
Dear list, Attached is a patch that implements the "append" command in a sftp session, as describe in "draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-01" and further releases. It is for and had been tested on the current version of OpenSSH (the Portable CVS) and it works, also against non patched versions. The patch is "simple" it it just like the "do_upload" function in
2002 Apr 01
0
[Bug 196] New: wront sent message id on upload
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196 Summary: wront sent message id on upload Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: chombier at
2008 Jul 21
2
sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist
Hello all Im using sftp 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2 in a batchjob Ive noticed that sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist. The timespan increases exponential if many files are on the remoteserver. for example "ls -la *.txt" needs 10 seconds for 2000 files but needs 50 seconds for 4000 files. For 150.000 Files i have to wait 15 minutes for example but the