similar to: [LLVMdev] slow on raspberry pi

On 12/16/14 3:53 AM, Kristof Beyls wrote: > I've been wondering too about how to get better ARM v6m compile-and-execute > testing going. > > As you say Jon, the non-execution-based regression tests are surprisingly > good at catching issues; but they're no full substitute for executing the > code produced by the backend for a reasonably-sized test suite. > > If

Hi, I have downloaded llvm-2.0 source from llvm.org. My machine specs are: OS : Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) Tool Chain: gcc 3.x and gcc 4.x CPU: X86 I have been able to build llvm. I could not find anywhere in the build or documentation that my build of llvm can produce an ARM binary.In the config.log I could see it detected an X86 CPU which is correct since I am using in fact an X86 host CPU. I

Dear Friends, I need to connect with new UPS on my office, the brand is Piller, type AR single Only have rs232 port. I have plan using raspberry pi as data poller + NUT But when I try to find a compatible device list, there is no Piller on list. Does anyone know the similar product brand protocol with Piller? Thanks -- Br Wawan Wiratno Embedded Linux Org. eLinux.org +62 81284790337

On Jul 15, 2019, at 11:15 AM, David White wrote: > > 2. When I check the results from "netstat -t -n" I am NOT finding anything on 3493. Hmmm. I then tried "netstat -l" since there should be a server socket listening on 3494, right? There is nothing of 3493. But I do see an entry with local address = localhost:nut. When I "cat /etc/services" I find nut listed

Hello, even though the study of Intel MPX took much longer than expected, we have finally finished it. Currently, it is published in two formats: * as a technical report: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00719 * and as a webpage: https://intel-mpx.github.io/ This work contains evaluation of MPX from perspectives of performance (Phoenix, PARSEC, and SPEC benchmark suites), security (RIPE and found

Evan, > I'm the code owner of LLVM codegen and targets. I'm also the one of main developers on the original ARM target. That means, I would make the decisions on major development on ARM target if there are decisions to be made. > > But my role is very different from what people are looking for in this thread. To properly qualify a target like ARM which are supported on many

Bob Wilson wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >> has the >> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >> I think. >> When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin >> work on >> replacing the Linux that

> > $ qemu-arm -cpu ? > > Available CPUs: > > arm926 arm946 arm1026 arm1136 arm1136-r2 arm1176 arm11mpcore > > cortex-m3 > > cortex-a8 > > cortex-a8-r2 cortex-a9 cortex-a15 ti925t pxa250 sa1100 sa1110 > pxa255 pxa260 > > pxa261 pxa262 pxa270 pxa270-a0 pxa270-a1 pxa270-b0 pxa270-b1 xa270- > c0 > > pxa270-c5 any > > >

CentOS 7 How do I print something on the text-mode console right after the OS has finished booting? I've a virtual instance and I need to know its IP address after it has finished booting up, to know where to ssh into it. I've tried adding "ip -4 addr > /dev/tty0" to rc.local, but that obviously doesn't work, because the login prompt overwrites everything I do. --

Hi, I am trying to build llvm-2.1 and llvm-gcc4 but running into build errors and not getting the code base compiled successfully since quite a few time. My host OS: Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) My Host processor: i686 My target processor: Arm11/Arm9 Languages support needed: c, c++ host compiler version: gcc 4.0.1 I am getting errors while compiling LLVM and llvm-gcc both: The LLVM build error is

So I read the Kaleidoscope tutorial, big thanks to Chris Latter. Good pace, still excellent coverage. Just at the end it mentions closures and I was wondering how those are done in llvm. The link was to wikipedia, and i do know what closures/blocks/continuations are, (i think) but maybe someone could point me to where to read about how to do them in llvm. Thanks Torsten

Hello, I'll start a voip project, but i don't know which DSP is more indicate for the project. Any one can help me??? Which processor is more indicate for speex use ??? Thank you!! Rafael V. Gon?alves

Dear Speex developers I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one frame Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? Best Regards Zohar fox -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20081105/8261e962/attachment.htm

On Jul 12, 2019, at 2:39 PM, David White wrote: > > Thanks Roger for all your help here. I hope the 2 attachments come through. The .sh is my doctored version of the script and the .report is its output. I welcome any suggestions or ideas about what might be causing my problems with monitoring to the Belkin UPS. Cheers Hi David, Nothing looks out of order in your configuration files.

I went ahead and committed it, along with a basic test case, in svn r159538. On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > You're absolutely right, that pattern should definitely have an "only-in-Thumb2" predicate attached. > > Do you have commit access? Also, if you have a reduced test case, that would be awesome, but

Hi all, I need a periodic timer running at ideally at 125 microseconds and at least 500 microseconds. I''ve just found the VCPUOP_set_periodic_timer, however there is a comment saying "periods less than one millisecond may not be supported". I will be running on an x64 machine. Is this supported? If not, is there any alternate means of generating a fast interrupt? Regards.

What about ARM target ? I mean iPhone/iPod Touch has an ARM11 with a FPE and a VFPE. Does llvm-gcc 2.2 generates better code for them ? I'm a bit disappointed about the llvm-gcc 2.0 I tried for my iPod Touch as I saw it generated ARM code not very optimically : r7(apparently used like a frame pointer even when -fomit-frame-pointer is given) largely overused, generated code like "mov

Hello, I write to you for the announcement in this blog: http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=86. I am interested in the open-source solution proposed in this article (the preprocessor-macros solution). Have you solved the problem? Does the offer still stands? Kind Regards, Fernando Pelliccioni. Buenos Aires, Argentina

The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Bob Wilson wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> Hmm.  Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >>> has the

Thanks for the clarifications, Bob! I’ve spent some time with the head of the llvm.org repo, and I now understand a lot better what Renato and Tim were talking about re. the architecture aliases. The patch to add v6l, therefore, seems simple enough. I haven’t been able to test it in my usual flow, because that involves the whole swift stack. I’m considering creating a program that links to