similar to: blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110

On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query.

2014-03-08 14:26 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? > > Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query. Thanks for the

I have a ups that doesn't always (sometimes it does) load NUT right. I use Gentoo: * sys-power/nut Latest version available: 2.6.0-r1 Latest version installed: 2.6.0-r1 Size of files: 1,663 kB Homepage: http://www.networkupstools.org/ Description: Network-UPS Tools License: GPL-2 The kernel is 3.0.4. Here is the dmesg output:

Hi all, after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: [...] [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [256789.640795] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8

Hi, I keep getting the following messages (or similar) in my syslog: Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.921566] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -110 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.972569] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -75 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.976568] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel:

The UPS is connected to the following environment: OS: Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 (stretch) NUT version: 2.7.4-5 Device output from lsusb: 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS Model name: MGE EllipseMAX 1500 URLs: http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/Ellipse-MAX-eol.aspx?cx=97&GUID=7BB6CD53-9F6D-4D62-B326-1099F137BF8D http://powerquality.eaton.com/68558.aspx?cx=97 The problem

> If there is no message to NUT, I would consider opening a trouble > ticket with Eaton. It is possible that there is a known issue and/or > a firmware upgrade. What kind of message to NUT? In the log (syslog) there is no other message registered. In nut.log only this appears: > Dec 1 08:10:54 openmediavault upsd[5284]: Data for UPS [ellipsemax] > is stale - check driver >

I recently purchased a CyberPower CP1200AVR UPS and am trying to get NUT 2.0.3 or NUT 2.1.0 to work with the newhidups driver, but am having little success. Before I purchased I did some googling and saw people talking about problems so I'm guessing it may not be supported yet? I did find some posts about people getting it to (sort of) work with some hacks, but couldn't tell if they

Dear List, I thought it might be useful if I wrote up my notes on getting an MGE UPS to work with NUT and openSUSE. The MGE UPS (an Ellipse 1500 USB) will work well with NUT and openSUSE 10.2, but not "out-of-the-box": there are some things you need to do: Intro. MGE have built rpms of NUT which greatly simplify installation. Merci MGE. I used the rpm's for nut-2.0.5 and the

Hello list, I have a "Salicru SPS One 700VA" in a Debian Wheezy server. I configured a week ago, it works well, but today it start to show "UPS salicru at 192.168.x.x:3493 is unavailable" And I got this in the system logs: # dmesg [147080.501925] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147080.503913] usb 4-5: usbfs:

Hello, I'm using NUT to manage a MGE Ellipse ASR UPS, with the newhidups driver. It works fine, except that after a few hours, I get a few errors from the kernel and the driver dies. Here's the output from the syslog: Apr 26 02:00:41 ezquiel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -110 Apr 26 02:00:43 ezquiel last message repeated 2 times

Dear List, I have an MGE Ellipse 1500. I run openSUSE 10.2, kernel 2.6.18, libusb 0.1.12, nut 2.0.5. ps shows that the following processes are running: /usr/lib/ups/driver/newhidups -a mgeups /usr/sbin/upsd -u root /usr/sbin/upsmon /usr/sbin/upsmon NUT operates correctly, shutting down the server after 4 minutes without power. However I'm seeing 25 to 50 messages logged each day in

Hi, There is many (20 per day on average) messages like: kernel: usb 2-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret -110 usbhid-ups[6768]: HIDGetDataValue: Connection timed out What can be done do correct that problem? best regards, Franck my configuration: debian etch nut 2.2.1 (recompiled source from testing to use latest version before posting here) updated

I am seeing some problems when using the Powerware 5115 UPS when connected to the Patsburg USB controller and would like to know if anyone has a solution. The symptom is that PING messages sent to the bcmxcp_usb driver take as long as 25 seconds to complete. The configuration is a Romley patform (a.k.a., Sandy Bridge + Patsburg) running Debian 6 with 2.6.39 kernel with NUT 2.6.4 in which the

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > +.SS "Repetitive timeout and staleness" > + > +Some models tends to be unresponsive with the default polling frequency. > +The result is that your system log will have lots of messages like: > +.nf > + usb 2-1: control timeout on ep0in > + usb 2-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 128 rq

Well, also below in dmesg: [ 190.249219] usb 3-1.3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 26.11.2014, 03:05, "Victor Porton" <porton at narod.ru>: > A fragment of dmesg output (here idVendor=0665, idProduct=5161 is the UPS; the webcam is idVendor=17a1, idProduct=0128): > > [ ???1.317085] usb 4-1: new high-speed USB device number 2

On Nov 25, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Victor Porton <porton at narod.ru> wrote: > Well, also below in dmesg: > > [ 190.249219] usb 3-1.3: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 -110 is -ETIMEDOUT. > 26.11.2014, 03:05, "Victor Porton" <porton at narod.ru>: >> A fragment of dmesg output (here idVendor=0665, idProduct=5161 is the

OPENSOURCE wrote: > > I hope this answer your questions, and I hope you're ready to wait a bit > more. > Sure, NP for me, thanks for the feedback Arnaud. I have to admit that past days im having the syslog with a lil more activity from the new usb attached unit (ellipse ASR 1000 VA) Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.23 (2.0.2-pre2) Detected an UPS: MGE UPS