similar to: What is the process for release notes for LLVM

This approximately follows my understanding and expectation. I think that, if you have commit access, commits to improve release notes fall under the contribution guidelines for documentation and therefore do not require a full Phabricator review. I know Alex Bradbury tries to coordinate the RISC-V backend-related release notes based on the backend changes since the last release, and this seems

Eh - I'd say "Big" new features (hey, LLVM supports DWARFv5, or Split DWARF, or DWARF type units, or DWARF compression (though I don't think I wrote any release notes for several of those features that I implemented)). I wouldn't bother release noting changes in output format for tools we don't consider to have stable output, or changes in robustness/better error

On 2020-04-30, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: >For the tools (which I know is mostly what James works on) I’d say new command-line options are worth release-noting as a way to advertise their existence. > >From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of David Blaikie via llvm-dev >Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 11:47 AM >To: James Henderson <jh7370.2008

For background on these calls, see <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-September/135087.html>. Reminder: the purpose is to co-ordinate between active contributors. If you have support questions etc then it's best to post to llvm-dev. We have a call every alternate Thursday at 4pm BST, via <https://meet.google.com/ske-zcog-spp>. We have created a shared calendar which

> www.icecast.org contains information regarding the icecast > 1.x releases. > Development on that series has stopped in favor of Icecast2 > and Ices2, for Are you serious??? The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has *nothing* to do with the web site. Not from a user perspective anyways. What's infuriating is you're not even ASKING for help..

Hi Devs, since risc-v has a register $tp which is thread pointer. is it possible to have __builtin_thread_pointer for RISC-V? I am not sure what could be corresponding instructions? ./kamlesh

Hi all developers, I'm changing compiler from gcc to llvm on a RISCV target now. but I found in some case the assembly code generated by llvm is much more than gcc. It cause my program's performance about 40% decrease. The flowing is a simple test code. It shows the problem. We can see than gcc prefer to use pointer to iterate the array, but llvm perfere to use index to iterate

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "RE: [icecast] directory servers". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1037921402.17606.bab310@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org

Something that would be good to get clarity on: The RISC-V backend recently had a bugfix patch that got backported to the 10.0.1 branch. The original patch introduced a new virtual method in TargetLowering.h, and the backported patch [1] was rewritten to avoid changing the ABI of libLLVM.so. This feels like some kind of policy decision about the C++ ABI beyond "it's entirely

Yes - this has been in InstCombine for a long time: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp#L268 We could say that the canonicalization should be reversed, but that probably uncovers more missing optimizations. The code size concern is legitimate. For example on x86, gcc asm is 2 bytes smaller on this example:

Thanks. I have checked the hook DAGCombiner::isMulAddWithConstProfitable And I think the above condition is too aggressive. // If the add only has one use, this would be OK to do. if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse()) return true; Shall we make it to if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse() && TargetLowering.isCheaperCommuteAddMul(......)) return true; The virtual hook

Hi Everyone, I am wondering how to use RISC-V V (Vector) extension instructions in LLVM IR. In 2019 Kruppe and Espasa gave a talk [1] overviewing the Vector extension and on slide 16 [2] they show LLVM IR samples which use the vector instructions through intrinsic functions, such as: %vl = call i32 @llvm.riscv.vsetvl(i32 %n) At the time of the talk (April 2019) LLVM support for the V

Hi, We are still on track to retire SVN and complete the transition to GitHub by Oct 21, 2019 (This year's US Dev Meeting). Even though this 3+ months away, it is very important that you begin to migrate your workflows to GitHub as soon as possible. For developers, this means using the git-llvm script to commit changes and for CI systems or other read-only use cases can begin fetching code

Dear sir, Thanks for your reply. I apologize for taking a few days to reply. > Crashed how? Please see the below. > Have you turned on ASan? Not yet, but thanks for the suggestion. I guess I will try to rebuild my modified Clang+LLVM with addr. san. and see what happens. > I recommend attaching a minimal reproduction... Well, since I`m hacking on LLVM itself, this is not

I've posted a couple of times about this problem. This is a plea for help with Roaming Profile configuration. The short problem is that logging on and logging off takes about ten minutes, with a fresh roaming profile (~1MB), on a 100Mb LAN. If anyone has any suggestions or pointers or questions, *please* pipe up. I'm all out of ideas.

Hello, we MUST join a 3.6 Samba into a Samba-Ad with 4.11, which options do I have to set? on the DCs to join the samba 3.6. Pleas no answer "update to 4.x" it's NOT possible at the moment ? thanks Stefan

Dear all, In the process of trying to add optimization for better layout of global variables, I have run up against a roadblock: I don`t seem to be able to sort the contents of a "SymbolTableListTraits<GlobalVariable>" -- or even swap two elements in that list -- without causing LLVM to crash. I have tried writing a comparator class and then using "llvm::iplist<

Hi all, FYI, just a warning/note. I read my email on mutt from samba.org. When I get an html formatted email I just hit 'D' (delete) without looking at the contents. I think many other Samba Team members do the same. If you send an urgent plea for help and it's html formatted then I doubt anyone in the Samba Team will ever see it. html formatted email is 99.9% spam, and gets treated

Hi Tom, I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. Can you pleas take care of this? In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920

http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdfs.jpg ecdfs.jpg http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdf_curve.gif ecdf_curve.gif Hello, I have generated a plot of two empirical CDFs (attachment 1). As a result, they are stepwise when plotted. The following code was used: > plot(ecdf(mut), do.points=FALSE, verticals=TRUE, xlim=range(mut, non), > col="red") >