similar to: Are C++17 host applications supported?

Hi All, A preliminary version of removable code support has been posted for review in https://reviews.llvm.org/D79312. This patch removes all uses of VModuleKeys (except for Legacy layers) and takes a whole-JITDylib-at-a-time approach to removal. Removing whole JITDylibs requires more work from clients (compared to per-module removal): Modules to be removed must be placed into throw-away

Hi, I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month to get your fix in. To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch, file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug. -Tom

Hi All, This week I've been focused on removing some of the blockers for people transitioning from ORCv1 to ORCv2. Issue #1 (http://llvm.org/PR40074, http://llvm.org/PR44337): When LLVM codegens floating point constants for COFF we produce named constant pool entries of the form __real@<bitval>. These are stored in COFF COMDAT sections [1] which allow duplicate symbol definitions to

Hi All, I know we're late in the release process, but I've discovered a regression I believe is serious enough to hold the release [1]. The regression is in usages of `__builtin_constant_p` applied to a dereferenced pointer in a constant expression. In certain cases Clang now rejects this as a non-constant expression [2]. This regression will have a larger impact than it initially

Hi Bill, I committed a fix already as r355743 [1], and it fixes `test2` as well. I believe we should merge this into 8.0. /Eric [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/680e865c313a80b6ec329abde61e1f0c66bdc103 On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:46 PM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > The attached patch may help matters, though it now fails because

Hello everyone A previous thread about OrcJIT brought up bug reports on Bugzilla. A quick search gives 20+ results: https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?component=OrcJIT&list_id=162232&query_format=advanced&resolution=--- While some of them are obviously outdated (addModuleSet API cleanup [1]), others may actually be relevant again (Small code model? [2]). If you reported one of them,

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at

On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > Part of me is still concerned with the future, and the filesystems which are yet to exist. > Me too. But it is best to target modern systems when targeting future systems adds an unnecessary cost. When future systems come into being, it is likely because future hardware is making those future systems

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:14 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Stefan Thank you! In case, you missed in llvm-dev listing: you can find the proposal here : link. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1202EcXlWMQ8yxu5qD0b5fE0a_kihlcaPNpZo_Jk0YeQ/edit?usp=sharing> Thanks for working on summarising the Bugzilla tickets to track the recent changes in ORC this is really helpful. On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 21:33, Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at

Hi all, I have the folowing frame(there are more columns than shown), 1 2 3 4 5 Year Total Tus Whi Norw 1994 1.00 1830 0 355 1995 1.00 0 0 0 1995 1.00 0 0 0 1995 1.00 4910 4280 695 1997 1.00 0 0

Gracias por la ayuda Jose Luis. pero o no te he entendido bien o mi duda es tan sencilla que no me he explicado. SI yo tampoco he entendido mal tu explicación, mi problema es cómo obtengo ese "tus.pesos" para introducir, por ejemplo, en la función: library(survey) # objeto del diseño muestral ddatos <- svydesign(id=~1, weights =~ tus.pesos, data = tus.datos) # en caso de una reg

Hello there Im suzuky Pinto from Mexico. And Im buying a new computer and this have windows vista. Could I have any problem using R on it? thabks Suzuky** Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr). Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta. http://mx.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I have the folowing frame(there are more columns than shown), 1 2 3 4 5 Year Total Tus Whi Norw 1994 1.00 1830 0 355 1995 1.00 0 0 0 1995 1.00 0 0 0 1995 1.00 4910 4280 695 1997 1.00 0 0

Hola, espero ser clara en el mensaje ya que es la primera vez que recurro a este tipo de ayudas, explico mi duda: Tengo un dataset con 4505 observaciones en el que la variable dependiente son presencias (n=97 y clasificadas como 1) y ausencias (n=4408 y clasificadas como 0). Mi primer paso fue realizar un GLM con una muestra compensada de ausencias y presencias para la variable dependiente, es

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in > >> this fairly

Buenas tardes, Estoy estimando un modelo binomial negativo de ceros inflados (ZINB) utilizando el comando zeroinfl() del paquete pscl. Al ejecutarlo me da el siguiente aviso: Warning: glm.fit: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred ¿Sabéis que significa y si puedo usar el modelo aún con ese aviso? ¿Los coeficientes son fiables? Muchas gracias, Miriam

Hello Everyone! i need to know if there is a way to send to windows XP a key reg to disable the usb storage, my samba is a PDC. the key in the window's registry is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\UsbStor --------------------------------- Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y tambi?n tus fotos de Flickr). Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versi?n Beta.

¿Quieres decir que para un nivel de una variable categorica todas las observaciones de la variable respuesta sean ceros? Gracias El Lun, 9 de Abril de 2018, 19:59, Carlos J. Gil Bellosta escribió: > ¿Podría ser que para algún nivel de alguna variable independiente > categórica solo hubiese ceros? En ese caso, casi seguro, aparecería ese > tipo de warning. > > El lun., 9 abr. 2018 a

Muchas gracias por la respuesta. He mirado y los coeficientes no son altos pero sí tengo una gran cantidad de ceros en la variable dependiente (más del 90%). Sin embargo, al incluir otro tipo de variables independientes no me da ese aviso, dejando la misma variable dependiente. ¿Cómo podría utilizar stan/rstan de forma sencilla para diagnosticar el modelo? Muchas gracias El Lun, 9 de Abril de