similar to: How to use bugpoint for backend native code generation?

Hi Craig, Thanks for the information. Can you point to the source that specifies tGPR to be R0 - R7? I tried to search in ARMInstrThumb.td but couldn’t find it. Thanks, - Jie On Apr 14, 2019, at 15:28, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com<mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote: I believe there is probably a separate instruction in LLVM for thumb2 add. Probably starting with t2

Sorry for not being specific enough. ARMv7-M includes Thumb and Thumb2. It has 12 regular registers (R0 - R12), and R8 - R12 are used. I can generate mov instruction that from/ R8-R12 to/from R0-R6. From this ARM page http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0068b/ch03s03s01.html R9 - R12 have their conventional usage, but I don’t if this is the reason we cannot use them

Dear All, I’m working on a project that extends C. I’m adding a new type of pointer that is a fat pointer. It has some metadata about the pointed object besides the starting address of the object. Currently I implemented this pointer as an llvm:StructType. In llvm::Type generation function llvm::Type *CodeGenTypes::ConvertType(QualType T) in the case for clang::Type::Pointer, instead of creating

Dear All, In my development, a function returns a struct {i8*, i64}, and on the call site I need to assign the return value to a struct of type {some_struct*, i64}. One way to do it is to call the mutateType() method of llvm::Value on the return value of the function call; however, I’m concerned that this mutateType() method might be too disruptive (it’s discouraged to use it by the

Dear all, I’m developing Clang&LLVM on MacOS Catalina 10.15. Now every time I "make clang", the building systems rebuilds all the .inc files generated by cmake, which essentially rebuilds all the tablegen files in llvm, although I did not change any of the tablegen files. The building is unnecessary and slow, especially when it builds the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc. Is there a way to

Greetings! As the generic Pass Instrumentation framework for new pass manager is finally *in*, I'm glad to start the discussion on implementation of -opt-bisect through that framework. As it has already been discovered while porting other features (namely, -time-passes) blindly copying the currently existing legacy implementation is most likely not a perfect way forward. Now is a chance

Hi all, I’m trying to insert some add/sub and push/pop instructions in a MachineFunction pass for ARMv7-M. However, I encountered something weird. For an add, when I use BuildMI(….., TII->get(ARM::tADDi8), reg).addReg(reg).addReg(reg).addImm(imm). if reg is R0 - R7, everything is fine: I would get something like adds r1, 4 But if I use R8 - R12 as the reg in the BuildMI, I wouldn’t get

On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:12, David Greene wrote: > I'm having some trouble using bugpoint with newer version of gcc (bugpoint > debug output below). I was using gcc 4.1.2. When I try 3.2.3 I get: bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c:237: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcpy' bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c: In function `main':

I'm having some trouble using bugpoint with newer version of gcc (bugpoint debug output below). I looked into the "conflicting type for malloc" problem and it doesn't seem easy to solve due to the unknown size of size_t (see LowerAllocations.cpp). The "void main()" problem is probably a result of this test being converted from Fortran. I'll have to dig into

Hi, I am trying to reduce what I believe to be a miscompilation bug. Running lli on my bitcode file causes a segmentation fault. However, running bugpoint as bugpoint file.bc gives me the following errors, /tmp/ccAdmNqH.o: In function `_ZL17bus_error_handleriP7siginfoPv': bugpoint-test-program.bc-Vega5s.cbe.c:(.text+0x1b4e1): undefined reference to `std::cerr' /tmp/ccAdmNqH.o: In

Hello. Can I use debugging options such as 'step', 'next'(in gdb) also in LLVM bugpoint? Thank you.

I have a failing test and bugpoint would be the perfect tool to help narrow it down. llc is the failing tool. It fails with one set of options and passes with another. I was hoping to use bugpoint like this: bugpoint -safe-llc -run-llc <testcase> -tool-args <failing args> -safe-tool-args <passing args> Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be possible. According to the

I would like to use bugpoint to debug some of my passes. I have read the documentation, but I don't completely understand it. I have a bitcode file X.bc that I transform using the following commands: opt -mypass1 -f -o X.1.bc X.bc // transform with mypass1 llvm-link -f -o X.2.bc X.1.bc support.bc // link with support.bc opt -mypass2 -f -o X.3.bc X.2.bc // transform with mypass2 After

While running the llvm tests, I get several error messages like these: [1/1] Running the LLVM regression tests FAILED: cd /home/steve/llvm-build/test && /usr/local/bin/python /home/steve/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py --param build_config=. --param build_mode=Release -sv --param llvm_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/lit.site.cfg --param

I'm starting work on getting bugpoint working with remote execution for arm. Is anyone else working on this? David

This is my first time using bugpoint. I'm getting the following error: /home/rkotler/llvmw/install/bin/bugpoint -run-llc casts.bc --tool-args -target mips-linux-gnu -mcpu=mips16 -mips16-constant-islands Read input file : 'casts.bc' *** All input ok Initializing execution environment: Found llc: /home/rkotler/llvmw/install/bin/llc Sorry, I can't automatically select a

Hello everyone, Please find the patch attached. This fixes the bugpoint -remote-client and adds a helper script for a remote run. -Viktor -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ToolRunner.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4210 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hi all, I've been running into what appears to be an optimization bug in llvm, while compiling the latest ruby 1.9.3 with the latest llvm/clang 2.9 version. From hands on experimentation I do know that the gvn pass for the "vm.c" compilation is the culprit of the miscompilation (clang -O2/-O3 options produce the miscompilation, however -O1 is fine!). I've also tried to

Thank you for this information. If so, is there any way to grasp which kinda data throw in and out in LLVM as shown in such a way in gdb? Thanks, Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:54:04 -0600 >From: "John T. Criswell" <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] bugpoint usage >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at

On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:18 AM, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > > llc X.3.bc arg1 arg2 > > That llc command is currently seg faulting because of a bug in one of my > passes or in support.bc. Can I use bugpoint to find a smaller version of > X.bc that produces the same problem? Specifically how would I call > bugpoint to do that? bugpoint X.3.bc -run-llc -tool-args arg1 arg2 /jakob