similar to: No subject

-- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1 EE 88 BC 57 > Is there any reason we don't just do serial PnP? Do UPSes not generally support this? Unfortunately, many cheap ones don't or have implementation flaws (the Sweex 1000 for instance, which calculates the CRC in the wrong way). In fact, there are a fair number of UPSes in the list of

> Added: > trunk/scripts/hotplug/Makefile.am > trunk/scripts/udev/Makefile.am > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/Makefile.am > trunk/configure.in > trunk/docs/configure.txt > trunk/scripts/Makefile.am > trunk/scripts/hotplug/ (props changed) > trunk/scripts/udev/ (props changed) > trunk/scripts/udev/README > Log: > -

I don't understand how the info_len element from the hid_info_t structure is used in usbhid-ups. It appears to me that the only use of this element is now to indicate the length of the string: > float info_len; /* if ST_FLAG_STRING: length of the string */ The above is clear, if the element is flagged as a string, the size of this string is put in this variable, so that we can use this in

It is possible at least on linux to get the port associated with a device from userspace - I'd assume that on each platform it's possible, just that libusb is incomplete (on top of being undocumented). Here's a patch for matching portnum on linux, with a few pieces pulled from libusb. It lacks autoconf macros to isolate it -- but it does appear to work. Regards, Alex Peyser On

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Arjen de Korte > To: nut-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:33:00 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r1076 - in trunk: . drivers > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Aug 27 18:33:00 2007 > New Revision: 1076 > > Log: > * drivers/libhid.[ch],libshut.[ch],libusb.[ch]: > - Cut the libshut and

THANKS, but the 'megatec' driver only works whith windows OS via USB, and i need it for red hat OS with USB-serial connection... Please, anybody can help me.... nut-upsuser-request@lists.alioth.debian.org escribi?: Send Nut-upsuser mailing list submissions to nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

> Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Jun 25 19:26:09 2007 > New Revision: 988 > > Log: > Update to reflect changes in the way we deal with dstate_dataok() and > dstate_datastale(). > > Historically it was needed to call dstate_dataok() regularly, to prevent > staleness warnings. This is no longer needed, now the server will PING > drivers it has not heard of

I guess this means we won't have access to SVN, right? Is there a timeline available when this will be fixed? Sadly enough, my keys were generated on an openSUSE system and are probably not affected by this vulnerability anyway. Best regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1 EE 88 BC 57 -------------- next part -------------- An

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: aquette > Date: Mon May 18 12:14:54 2009 > New Revision: 1846 > > Log: > Enable timestamp on output messages (format "%H:%M:%S: msg") I think this should only be done for messages that are sent to stderr. In most cases, syslog will already prepend a timestamp, so this is probably redundant.

> +22 = Gamatronic UPSs with alarm interface > + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-DCD] [SD=DTR] > + > +22 = CyberPower SL seriess > + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-CAR] [SD=DTR] > + > + This part of the patch is no good. While TIOCM_CAR is equivalent to TIOCM_CD (at least in some implementations) CAR certainly isn't handled the same as DCD by genericups. It won't be

Browsing through the newhidups.c code, I stumbled across the following: /* master list of avaiable subdrivers */ static subdriver_t *subdriver_list[] = { #ifndef SHUT_MODE &generic_subdriver, #endif &mge_subdriver, #ifndef SHUT_MODE &apc_subdriver, &belkin_subdriver, &tripplite_subdriver, NULL #endif }; Shouldn't the 'NULL' terminator be outside the

Looking for ioctl() calls in the drivers, I noticed that the energizerups.c code looks a lot like a megatec protocol over a USB connection. It uses 8 bytes per packet, which makes it look like the agiler subdriver in megatec_usb. Do we know if there are people that use this driver now and that might be able to verify this? Best regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66

Hi Peter, The explanation on why I want to flush the report buffer after running instcmd() or setvar() was incorrect. It is not the variable thats get written, that needs to be read fresh from the UPS. That is already handled by HIDSetItemValue(), which reads back the value and thereby refreshes the report buffer. I goofed up here, I looked at the wrong parameters. :-( However, when I change the

> next_device: > + free(curDevice->Vendor); > + free(curDevice->Product); > + free(curDevice->Serial); > + free(curDevice->Bus); > usb_close(udev); > udev = NULL; > } Wouldn't it be necessary to check whether there is anything to free or not? Vendor, Product and Serial are set conditionally. In the lines upsdebugx(2, "-

> - drivers/dstate-hal.[ch]: added sleep here, to limit the polling rate > (previously, the driver would completely ignore the poll interval and > would run upsdrv_updateinfo() without any delay in between) > > The changes to dstate-hal.[ch] should probably be backported to Testing > ASAP, since ignoring the poll_interval is not a good idea (you'll be > basically polling

> Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Feb 25 20:40:41 2008 > New Revision: 1334 > > Log: > Allocate twice the maximum number of reports we expect (MAX_REPORTS), to > allow for bogus/duplicate reports. Retrospectively, this is gross hack at best and probably only good to fix the problem temporarily. I think I have a better solution available (in a similar way as r1210, that was

Maybe a stupid question, but how paranoid should I be when it comes to character maps? Is it safe to assume that if I want '\x41' to be sent to a UPS, that this equals sending the 'A' character? In other words, is it considered portable that (at least for the output of the serial functions) we use an ASCII character map? Otherwise, on (for example) an EBCDIC system (do these still

> I see. For IP4 addresses, will ups@192.168.0.1:3493 still work as > expected? -- Peter Yes. Whatever is between '@' and the optional ':<portnumber>' is passed as hostname. Brackets (in case of domain literals) are removed. Best regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1 EE 88 BC 57

> * are you sure you want to use fprintf(stderr, ...) in a library? > This doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Wouldn't it be more > consistent to extend upscli_errlist[] ? Errorcodes are passed in 'ups->upserror' (and 'ups->syserrno'). Uh oh, we don't have a connection to an UPS yet when we call upscli_splitname() or upscli_splitaddr(). The

> I see. For IP4 addresses, will ups@192.168.0.1:3493 still work as expected? -- Peter Yes. Whatever is between '@' and the optional ':<portnumber>' is passed as hostname. Brackets (in case of domain literals) are removed. One thing to note, in the released versions the use of IPv4 addresses for a hostname (in upsclient.c) is not guaranteed to work (according to POSIX):