Arjen de Korte
2007-Jun-22 10:40 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] energizerups == megatec_usb -x subdriver=agiler?
Looking for ioctl() calls in the drivers, I noticed that the energizerups.c code looks a lot like a megatec protocol over a USB connection. It uses 8 bytes per packet, which makes it look like the agiler subdriver in megatec_usb. Do we know if there are people that use this driver now and that might be able to verify this? Best regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1 EE 88 BC 57
Arnaud Quette
2007-Jun-22 12:12 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] energizerups == megatec_usb -x subdriver=agiler?
2007/6/22, Arjen de Korte <arjen at de-korte.org>:> Looking for ioctl() calls in the drivers, I noticed that the > energizerups.c code looks a lot like a megatec protocol over a USB > connection. It uses 8 bytes per packet, which makes it look like the > agiler subdriver in megatec_usb. Do we know if there are people that use > this driver now and that might be able to verify this?apart from Viktor (energizerups author), I don't know. but there might not be that many out there. a call to test on the user list might help, but Viktor's point of view and test should help... that would be really nice since energizerups is the last one using hiddev (so Linux only USB), and I initiated talks with Viktor about that some time ago. -- Arnaud