Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Did llvm.org just run out of disk space?"
2016 Sep 12
3
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Ed Schouten <ed at nuxi.nl> wrote:
>>
>> ---- end ---
>
> Just to make sure I get this straight, I can substitute 'this
> Software' by the names of components provided by the LLVM project.
This is the literal license text that will be included with each of these projects, so no, you cannot literally make that substitution.
2016 Jul 31
0
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged
Hi Hans,
2016-07-30 0:57 GMT+02:00 Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the
> real testing started to see where we're at.
Just to double-check, is this bug also on people's radar? It causes
Clang to crash when trying to build a fair number of Open Source
packages/libraries. In my
2016 Aug 26
3
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 3 source and binaries available
We're very very close to the final release. Source and binaries for
LLVM-3.9.0-rc3 are available at
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.9.0/#rc3
This release candidate is almost the same as rc2, with the following
additional commits:
r279224 - Minor change to OpenCL release notes
r279260 - [lld] Add a note that 3.9 is a major milestone for us
r279468, r279474 - Fix gather-root.ll SLP vectorizer
2016 Sep 12
5
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
Hello everyone,
This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html
As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many
2010 Jun 17
1
LDA to address extensions
Hi List,
I'm trying to make dovecot deliver messages to sam+extension at example.com to the imap folder 'extension' of the user 'sam'. I've configured postfix with these dovecot as LDA:
mailbox_command = /opt/redknot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f "$SENDER" -d "$USER" -m "$EXTENSION" -a "$RECIPIENT"
recipient_delimiter = +
Sam is a
2010 Jul 22
1
NFS Maildirs
Hi,
We have our user homedirs on nfs so I enabled nfs parameters in dovecot.conf. Everything works fine but when I want to delete a homedir of a user I can't delete it because I can't remove the .nfs files in the Maildir. I don't want to stop dovecot, remove the homedir and start dovecot. Is there another way to accomplish this.
Thanks,
Martijn
# 1.2.12:
2016 Jul 29
12
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged
Dear testers,
3.9.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r277207.
This took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I think the branch is in
a decent state now.
There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the
real testing started to see where we're at.
Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
it goes. I'll upload source, docs,
2007 Jul 17
1
Not hearing the caller after 2 x Flash
Me again, another problem.
As I said before, I have 2 lines going into "incoming" context.
When client calls, I press Flash, client hears music on hold (only on
voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash
again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me
without problems.
I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime.
2020 Oct 19
6
[Bug 3221] New: hostkey preference ordering is broken in some situations
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
Bug ID: 3221
Summary: hostkey preference ordering is broken in some
situations
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.4p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
2007 Jul 11
2
Music on hold stops on blind transfer
Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE
Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops
when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing.
Is this normal behaviour? How to change this?
Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial.
-- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",
2007 Jul 20
2
priorityjumping not working, Dial goes to n+1 not n+101
Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and
1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2)
[general]
priorityjumping=yes
With n+101:
exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj)
exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS})
exten => 1337,n,Hangup
-- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack
-- Called zytek
2009 Jul 01
2
IMAP bandwidth
Hi,
I want to calculate the bandwidth usage of the IMAP protocol. POP3
displays a message when the connection is closed about the transfered
bytes.
In an old mailinglist post I found this message:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-March/020478.html
Is this patch integrated or is there another way to calculate the
bandwidth for IMAP connections?
Martijn de Munnik
--
YoungGuns
2015 Jan 10
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 3.6 branch is coming
On 10 Jan 2015, at 17:35, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like the interpretation of what "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__" means differs between the llvm developers and the FreeBSD developers. I'm not sure what a good solution is.
I've just read the relevant parts of the C11 spec, and it's not really clear to me what the 'basic
2009 Dec 25
2
[openssh-portable] utmpx and ut_name
Hello OpenSSH hackers,
The last couple of weeks I've been figuring out how hard it is to
replace FreeBSD's <utmp.h> with <utmpx.h>. I don't think utmpx is
perfect, but at least it's better than what we have now and at least it
has gone through some form of standardisation. I noticed POSIX says the
following [1]:
| The <utmpx.h> header shall define the utmpx
2009 Jan 06
3
Enforcing TLS
Hello all,
I've happily been using Dovecot for a couple of years now, but only a
couple of days ago I configured it to speak both TLS and SSL for both
POP3 and IMAP. Ideally I want users to use TLS, but I've enabled SSL,
because some mailers (at least Apple Mail on OS X Tiger) don't support
TLS.
Right now I'm in sort of a transitional phase, where I'm asking users to
enable
2010 Jan 13
1
[Patch] Make OpenSSH work with FreeBSD's utmpx implementation
Hello all,
The next version of FreeBSD will use utmpx for its user accounting
database, as opposed to utmp which is used right now.
Unfortunately wtmpx and lastlog handling isn't standardized at all,
which is why we took the liberty to integrate all these databases into a
compact API, where setutxdb() can be used to switch to a different
database and getutxuser() to search for a USER_PROCESS
1998 Aug 17
1
JDK1.1.6-jdk1.1.6.V98-8-14.tar.gz is released
This is essentially the same as the previous JDK release, except that
ServerSocket's didn't correctly set SO_REUSEADDR, causing some programs
to fail.
Note, the Multicast bug still exists in FreeBSD, which cause multicast
programs to fail. See the FreeBSD Java WWW page for more information:
http://www.freebsd.org/java
Finally, there is still no ftp access to the JDK (yet). Until
2010 Mar 06
7
[Bug 1732] New: Proper utmpx support for FreeBSD HEAD
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1732
Summary: Proper utmpx support for FreeBSD HEAD
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.4p1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: ed
2019 Feb 14
2
Can we disable diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 by default?
I ask because the removal of diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 happened
accidently in 7.8 due to a mistake in a change to readconf.c. I noticed
this and filed a bug about it along with a patch to fix readconf.c to use
KEX_CLIENT_* like it used to:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/1b9dd4aa
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2967
Its clear the removal was unintentional
2015 Jan 12
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 3.6 branch is coming
On 12 Jan 2015, at 08:07, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2014, at 19:42, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 15 Oct 2014 05:12, "Ed Schouten" <ed at 80386.nl> wrote:
> ...
>> The test case in the LLVM tree is invalid and should be discarded. It
>> erroneously assumes that the encoding of