llvm dev - Jan 2015 - [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 3.6 branch is coming

Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January.

Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For
example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty
empty.

Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know.

Cheers,
Hans

 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
 2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

On Friday, January 09, 2015 08:32 AM, Hans Wennborg
wrote:
> Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January.
>
> Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For
> example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty
> empty.
>
> Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me
know.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
>   1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>   2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>
Happy to test on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64.

Ben

On 9 January 2015 at 00:51, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Happy to test on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64.
ARM and AArch64 here.

--renato

On 09/01/2015 01:32, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January.
>
> Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For
> example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty
> empty.
>
> Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me
know.
>
>
Happy to test, all Debian archs.

Sylvestre

I'll test on FreeBSD, as usual.  Note that trunk has been failing
"check-all" on FreeBSD for some time now, due to this:

FAIL: Clang :: CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp (627 of 20130)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp' FAILED
********************
Script:
--
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1
-internal-isystem
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include
-nostdsysteminc -std=c++98
/share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1
-internal-isystem
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include
-nostdsysteminc -std=c++11
/share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1
-internal-isystem
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include
-nostdsysteminc -std=c++14
/share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1
-internal-isystem
/home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include
-nostdsysteminc -std=c++1z
/share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
  File /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp Line 259:
static_assert failed "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__ but all basic source
characters have same representation"
1 error generated.

--

It looks like the interpretation of what "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__"
means differs between the llvm developers and the FreeBSD developers.  I'm
not sure what a good solution is.

-Dimitry
> On 09 Jan 2015, at 01:32, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January.
> 
> Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For
> example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty
> empty.
> 
> Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me
know.
> 
> Cheers,
> Hans
> 
> 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
> 2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150110/be795279/attachment.sig>

On 10 Jan 2015, at 17:35, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com>
wrote:
> 
> It looks like the interpretation of what
"__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__" means differs between the llvm developers
and the FreeBSD developers.  I'm not sure what a good solution is.
I've just read the relevant parts of the C11 spec, and it's not really
clear to me what the 'basic character set' is.  There are two possible
interpretations:

- The set of characters that can be represented by a char in locale
"C"
- The set of characters that can be represented by a char in *any* locale

On FreeBSD, it is correct to define __STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__ for the second
definition, but not for the first.  Can anyone point to something in the spec
that clarifies this?

David

2015-01-09 1:32 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at
chromium.org>:
> [...]
> Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me
know.
I'm again in for testing OS X.

Cheers,
Sebastian

I'll be doing Mips.
________________________________________
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf
of Sebastian Dreßler [sebastian.dressler at gmail.com]
Sent: 10 January 2015 21:21
To: Hans Wennborg
Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Reminder: 3.6 branch is coming

2015-01-09 1:32 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at
chromium.org>:
> [...]
> Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me
know.
I'm again in for testing OS X.

Cheers,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev