similar to: XDEBUG build bots?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "XDEBUG build bots?"

2016 Apr 22
2
XDEBUG build bots?
Yeah, they are just triggered by lit check tests. I’ll file some bugs today, though it looks like Quentin may have already filed bugs for some of these. -- Geoff Berry Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org] Sent: Friday,
2016 Apr 29
2
XDEBUG build bots?
Thanks for noticing this, Geoff. I just landed r268050 which add a cmake option for this (and unifies XDEBUG and EXPENSIVE_CHECKS). This might make it easier to setup some build bots. Thank you, Filipe On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Bugs filed: > 27488 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27488> librarie
2017 Jul 17
2
An update on the DominatorTree and incremental dominators
Hi folks, For the past month I’ve been working on improving the DominatorTree and PostDominatorTree in LLVM. The RFC that explains the motivations and plans can be found here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114045.html . Here’s a short summary of what changed upstream since posting it: - We switched from the Simple Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm for computing dominators
2010 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
Just so this doesn't get lost in threads dealing with SelectionDAG issues, I'd like to post this patch for review. It changes the SDUse list from an intrusive list to a std::list<> under XDEBUG. This allows us to use the debugging features of the standard library to track down stubborn bugs. I've used this to diagnose in issue in SelectionDAG in our sources and also in the
2010 Mar 03
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
On Mar 2, 2010, at 8:58 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 01 March 2010 20:34:07 Dan Gohman wrote: >> Do you have a fix for the blackfin codegen? That would be a great >> way to motivate this patch. > > I'm not following you. Why does a fix for a bug have anything to do > with a patch that catches bugs? It helps people understand what's being checked. On an
2008 Aug 25
1
Issue with: Sendmail, Dovecot and Sieve: -- TECRA_A9 --
sendmail -- Version 8.14.2 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG dovecot-1.0.7 Secure and compact IMAP and POP3 servers dovecot-sieve-1.0.2 A sieve plugin for the Dovecot LDA called 'deliver' With focus on the
2010 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Debug SelectionDAG & SDUse
I need a review of this patch and if it looks sane, someone to apply it to their local sources and run tests in Debug+Checks mode. The patch replaces the intrusive SDUse list with a std::list<> when XDEBUG is active. I believe I've maintained the semantics of the SDUse list but I need a double-check. The patch exposes all kinds of problems in Debug+Checks mode. Right now most of
2010 Mar 02
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
On Monday 01 March 2010 20:34:07 Dan Gohman wrote: > Do you have a fix for the blackfin codegen? That would be a great > way to motivate this patch. I'm not following you. Why does a fix for a bug have anything to do with a patch that catches bugs? > Otherwise, at a glance, it appears you fixed the issues I raised, > so this is fine, if it catches real bugs. Oh, it catches real
2008 Mar 11
1
php 4/5 dependency question
I have a PHP box which was running NagiosQL on PHP4, and all of a sudden it stopped serving PHP pages. I went to http://boxIP/nagiosQL/testQL.php (that application's test page) and got the following error "PHP without mysql support, please install mysql module to php!" Not knowing what was broken, I attempted a "yum install php-*", but got the following message: --->
2006 Mar 22
5
gnokii on FreeBSD 6.0 and Dell PE 2850
Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060322/b3ddf5ba/attachment-0001.pgp
2010 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] SDUse Lists
Are SDUses ever allowed to be part of more than one list? I would think not due to the intrusive nature of the list links. However, this is what I am seeing with some testcases on trunk. I am putting together a patch that shows these kinds of problems in XDEBUG mode. I'll post it ASAP. -Dave
2010 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
Do you have a fix for the blackfin codegen? That would be a great way to motivate this patch. Otherwise, at a glance, it appears you fixed the issues I raised, so this is fine, if it catches real bugs. Dan On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:02 AM, David Greene wrote: > Just so this doesn't get lost in threads dealing with SelectionDAG > issues, I'd like to post this patch for review. It
2010 Nov 23
1
Eclipse Helios on CentOS 5.5 (was Websites Up!)
> Then I hope to finish my tutorial on installing Eclipse > Helios for Centos 5.5 Is there anything special to be done? I just unzipped the SR1 distribution for RCP/RAP developers linux-gtk-x86_64 and it works without problem on an up to date CentOS 5.5 x86_64. (to be more precise: I install it as root under /opt, install some plugins like subclipse and regular users start it from there)
2009 Sep 14
1
return from memset on mac osx
Does dtrace have a problem catching the return from memset on Mac OSX? The script below catches the entry just fine but the return clause is never entered. Thanks, Joel --- pid$target::memset:entry /arg1 == 0/ { self->size = arg2; self->ts = timestamp; self->vts = vtimestamp; } pid$target::memset:return /self->size/ { @ts = sum(timestamp - self->ts); @vts =
2008 Aug 19
1
TECRA-A9 -- devcot LDA/sendmail
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p3 i386 --------------- sendmail -d0.1 Version 8.14.2 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG ------------------ dovecot-1.0.7 dovecot-sieve-1.0.2 _______________________ IMAP-UW was previously used.
2016 Sep 27
1
Upgrading samba from source over debian packages
On 2016-09-27 16:40, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:17:10 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-09-27 13:31, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > Hello Elias, > > Am 27.09.2016 um 18:16 schrieb Elias Pereira via samba: > > We have samba 4.1.17 installed via debian package and would
2011 Feb 15
3
apache 2 and php 5.2
Hi originally I installed php 4 on centos 5.5 and then a few repos including the remi repo to upgrade to php5, which seems to upgrade/work without any issues. However when I make a change to the /etc/php.ini file it doesn't look like apache is seeing it, for example if I change the post_max_size and upload_max_file to 25M each apache still sees the default 2M. I also removed the /etc/php.ini
2007 Nov 14
10
[GE users] Apple Leopard has dtrace -- anyone used the SGE probes/scripts yet?
Hi, Chris (cc) and I try to get the SGE master monitor work with Apple Leopard dtrace. Unfortunately we are stuck with the error msg below. Anyone having an idea what could be the cause? What I can rule out as cause is function inlining for the reasons explained below. Background information on SGE master monitor implementation is under http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/Dtrace
2016 Oct 13
15
[Bug 98240] New: Kernel module fails to load on HP Pavilion V3A33AV laptop.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98240 Bug ID: 98240 Summary: Kernel module fails to load on HP Pavilion V3A33AV laptop. Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:
2006 Jun 07
0
Disable sessions for search engine bots?
I would like to disable sessions for search engine bots that browse my site. Is it possible to set session :off in application.rb based on the result of a method call that would check the request.user_agent for common search bots? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.