llvm dev - Jul 2013 - [LLVMdev] Windows reviewers still needed?

I watched some LLVM videos yesterday and there was one where Chandler
Carruth was saying that LLVM/clang needed more Windows savvy
developers to review patches.

Is this still the case?  If so, how do I contribute?
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book
<http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
         The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

> Is this still the case?  If so, how do I contribute?
Simply review windows patches, no?

--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Richard <legalize at xmission.com> writes:
> I watched some LLVM videos yesterday and there was one where Chandler
> Carruth was saying that LLVM/clang needed more Windows savvy
> developers to review patches.
>
> Is this still the case?  If so, how do I contribute?
Just to be more verbose that Anton... :-)

Subscribe to llvm-commits and cfe-commits mailing lists, watch for
patches touching Windows functionality and reply to them with your
comments.

Op 14-7-2013 17:41, Óscar Fuentes schreef:
> Richard <legalize at xmission.com> writes:
>
>> I watched some LLVM videos yesterday and there was one where Chandler
>> Carruth was saying that LLVM/clang needed more Windows savvy
>> developers to review patches.
>>
>> Is this still the case?  If so, how do I contribute?
>
> Just to be more verbose that Anton... :-)
>
> Subscribe to llvm-commits and cfe-commits mailing lists, watch for
> patches touching Windows functionality and reply to them with your
> comments.
>
There's also windows stuff going on in lldb-commits

--
Carlo Kok