similar to: [LLVMdev] Clarification on stable release shared object ABI compatibility

The most relevant of these is r222856 which reverted a set of broken optimizations in r210006. I'd be happy with just including r222856. Optionally, we could take r222868 and r222871 which correctly restore the optimization. On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Hey Tom, > > David has pointed out to me that we have some *really*

Hi, I've just tagged 3.5.1-rc2, so testing can begin. Remember to use the 3.5 branch of the test-suite. If you have any questions, let me know. -Tom

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 26 Nov 2014, at 16:50, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > ... > > I will try to look at the patches today. I'm going to delay the release a week > > or so, because of all the merge requests I've received,

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:51:07AM -0800, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I also have several patches that might be useful in 3.5.1. They all are stability fixes: > > r221009: Correctly update dom-tree after loop vectorizer. > r222451: Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll. > r223170 and r223171: PR21302.Vectorize only bottom-tested loops. > Hi Arnold,

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... > >> I would like to propose the following additional patches for 3.5.1. These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dimitry Andric" <dimitry at andric.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu)" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard.net> > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:34:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Hi, 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me know. For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation for how validate a new release: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > > From: Daniel Sanders > > Sent: 25 November 2014 17:39 > > To: Eric Christopher; Tom Stellard > > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu) > > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1 > > > > > > > > I'd also like to propose the inclusion of

I've uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz. The latter fails prune.m in 'make check-all' as it did last time but this is because the 'touch -a' command isn't actually changing the access timestamp. I've started the test-suite for both of them. ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:27:32PM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz: > All ok for default options and -mips32. > > clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz: > All ok for default options. > It will take a couple days to get results for the -mips32 test-suite (there's no FPU or local disk on this machine so some tests

Hi, Here is schedule for upcoming stable releases: 3.5.2 - This will be the last 3.5.x release. There was a critical bug fix that did not make it into 3.5.1, which made it necessary to do 3.5.2. I will accept other fixes, but the merge window will be very short: March 16 - Tag 3.5.2-rc1 and begin testsing March 25 - 3.5.2 release (If no regressions found during testing). 3.6.1 - Bug fixes

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:37PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... > >> I would like to propose the following additional patches for 3.5.1. These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base

On 20 January 2014 15:44, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Here is a summary of the responses. > These items are still up for discussion, but if there are no > objections in the next few days, I will add these to the > release documentation: > Hi Tom, Thanks for the summary, I agree with mostly everything, but I have some specific

Hi, I'm seeming new regressions form 4.0.0 for mips big endian: DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: custom.cc DataFlowSanitizer-mips64 :: propagate.c SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard-dso.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips-Linux :: sanitizer_coverage_trace_pc_guard.cc SanitizerCommon-asan-mips64-Linux :: Linux/getpwnam_r_invalid_user.cc

You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :) Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded. On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We

Hi Tom, I saw the tags go in and tried to start the builds but it seems that you forgot one: $ LANG=C CFLAGS=-mips32r2 CXXFLAGS=-mips32r2 ./test-release.sh -triple mips-linux-gnu -build-triple mips-linux-gnu -no-64bit -j4 -release 3.5.1 -rc 1 # Validating llvm SVN URL # Validating cfe SVN URL # Validating dragonegg SVN URL # Validating compiler-rt SVN URL # Validating libcxx SVN URL # Validating

Hi, Just a reminder that I'm planning to start the 3.5.1 release cycle on Wednesday. If you have any patches you want included in 3.5.1 please let me know. There haven't been many stable patches so far, so I may be willing to extend the deadline if some people have fixes, but won't be able to get to them before Wednesday. Also, if you are interested in helping to test the 3.5.1

On Thursday, January 15, 2015 06:55 AM, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > Was there an rc3 that I missed? > It's not tagged if there was. I've tested and uploaded 3.5.1 final for x86_64-ubuntu-14.04. I think the rc2 build required a newer libstdc++ than exists on Ubuntu 14.04, but the final build should be good. Ben

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:04:35PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just a reminder that testing for 3.5.2 will begin on Monday, Mar 16. If > > you have any patches you want merged please send an email to the > > relevant commits list and cc me and the code owner. If you have already >

> On Mar 4, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, < <mailto:>> wrote: > @A_vtable = {i8*, i8*, i32, i32} {0, @A::rtti, @A::f - (@A_vtable + 16), @A::g - (@A_vtable + 16)} > > There's a subtlety about this aspect of the ABI that I should call attention to. The virtual function