Hi, 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me know. For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation for how validate a new release: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final. There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so I can update the docs. If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks, Tom
test-release.sh outputs the compressed archives and we just upload them to ftp. I think you just have to move them somewhere and link to them from the webpage. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> > Hi, > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > know. > > For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation > for how validate a new release: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html > > Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the > test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final. > > There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package > the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there > may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if > one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release > documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so > I can update the docs. > > If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask. > > Thanks, > Tom >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141212/5e372d0f/attachment.html>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:04:46PM +1100, Nikola Smiljanic wrote:> test-release.sh outputs the compressed archives and we just upload them to > ftp. I think you just have to move them somewhere and link to them from the > webpage. >What directory does test-release.sh put the compressed archives? -Tom> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > > know. > > > > For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation > > for how validate a new release: > > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html > > > > Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the > > test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final. > > > > There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package > > the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there > > may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if > > one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release > > documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so > > I can update the docs. > > > > If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask. > > > > Thanks, > > Tom > >
On 12 December 2014 at 01:26, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > know.Testing ARMv7 and AArch64. Will upload when it finishes. cheers, --renato
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > know.Sorry for coming late to the party; my Windows box decided to die earlier this week. After re-installing everything, lld refused to build on the 3.5 branch. I'm not sure how it ever worked before, but I need to merge r220117 to make it work. I also got two test failures. I haven't checked yet if they also occur in 3.5, but I'm not sure they matter on Windows: LLVM: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll Clang: Modules/compiler_builtins.m I've uploaded it to the sftp: LLVM-3.5.1-rc1-win32.exe sha1: 3c3892daa5119e60ee7b0917c4c1ac8251a949c6 - Hans
You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :) Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded. On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > > know. > > Sorry for coming late to the party; my Windows box decided to die > earlier this week. > > After re-installing everything, lld refused to build on the 3.5 > branch. I'm not sure how it ever worked before, but I need to merge > r220117 to make it work. > > I also got two test failures. I haven't checked yet if they also occur > in 3.5, but I'm not sure they matter on Windows: > > LLVM: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll > Clang: Modules/compiler_builtins.m > > I've uploaded it to the sftp: > LLVM-3.5.1-rc1-win32.exe > sha1: 3c3892daa5119e60ee7b0917c4c1ac8251a949c6 > > - Hans >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141213/4ff8643b/attachment.html>
sebastian.dressler at gmail.com
2014-Dec-14 21:04 UTC
[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins
Hi everyone,
I have a failing test on OS X 10.10:
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll (9584 of 18783)
******************** TEST 'LLVM ::
CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mips -relocation-model=static <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM32 --check-prefix=O32-BE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mipsel -relocation-model=static <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM32 --check-prefix=O32-LE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mips64 -relocation-model=static -mattr=-n64,+n32 <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM32 --check-prefix=NEW-BE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mips64el -relocation-model=static -mattr=-n64,+n32 <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM32 --check-prefix=NEW-LE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mips64 -relocation-model=static -mattr=-n64,+n64 <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM64 --check-prefix=NEW-BE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/llc
-march=mips64el -relocation-model=static -mattr=-n64,+n64 <
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
|
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.5.1-rc1.obj/Release/bin/FileCheck
--check-prefix=ALL --check-prefix=SYM64 --check-prefix=NEW-LE
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
/Users/rock/llvm/3.5.1-testing/rc1/llvm.src/test/CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll:28:14:
error: expected string not found in input
; SYM32-DAG: lui [[PTR_HI:\$[0-9]+]], %hi(bytes)
^
<stdin>:15:7: note: scanning from here
s_i8: # @s_i8
^
<stdin>:24:5: note: possible intended match here
addiu $2, $gp, %gp_rel(bytes)
^
Does it ring a bell somewhere??
Cheers,
Sebastian
> --On 12.12.2014, at 02:26, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can
> always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me
> know.
>
> For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation
> for how validate a new release:
> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html
>
> Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the
> test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final.
>
> There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package
> the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there
> may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if
> one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release
> documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so
> I can update the docs.
>
> If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Hi, uploaded binary to SFTP: clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz Except for the failing test mentioned before, there were no regressions. Cheers, Sebastian 2014-12-12 2:26 GMT+01:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>:> Hi, > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > know. > > For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation > for how validate a new release: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html > > Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the > test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final. > > There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package > the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there > may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if > one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release > documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so > I can update the docs. > > If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask. > > Thanks, > Tom > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 05:06:39PM -0800, Hans Wennborg wrote:> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > > know. > > Sorry for coming late to the party; my Windows box decided to die > earlier this week. > > After re-installing everything, lld refused to build on the 3.5 > branch. I'm not sure how it ever worked before, but I need to merge > r220117 to make it work. >Does it build with the 3.5.0? If so, I think we will need to merge this fix.> I also got two test failures. I haven't checked yet if they also occur > in 3.5, but I'm not sure they matter on Windows: > > LLVM: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll > Clang: Modules/compiler_builtins.m > > I've uploaded it to the sftp: > LLVM-3.5.1-rc1-win32.exe > sha1: 3c3892daa5119e60ee7b0917c4c1ac8251a949c6 > > - Hans
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:26:23PM -0500, Tom Stellard wrote:> Hi, > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can > always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me > know. >It appears that all the problems with -rc1 have been resolved. I will tag -rc2 later today. -Tom> For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation > for how validate a new release: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html > > Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the > test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final. > > There is one undocumented step, which is how to package build/package > the binaries so they can be uploaded to the website. I think there > may be a script for this, but I'm not sure. It would be great if > one of the veteran testers could add this information to the release > documentation, or at the very least explain to me what to do so > I can update the docs. > > If you have any questions about testing, don't hesitate to ask. > > Thanks, > Tom > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev