llvm dev - Dec 2014 - [LLVMdev] Vectorize Patches for 3.5.1 (was Re: Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1)

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Dimitry Andric
wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
> >> I would like to propose the following additional patches for
3.5.1.  These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the
FreeBSD 11.0 base system.  Apologies in advance for the long list. :)
> ...
> > Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval.  It
might
> > help to send a separate email per code owner.
> 
> Hi Renato,
> 
> Can you please approve the following revisions for backporting to 3.5.1:
> 
> r216989: Only emit movw on ARMv6T2+
> r216990: Missing test from r216989
> 
These both LGTM, go ahead and merge into the 3.5 branch.

-Tom
> -Dimitry
>

Hi Tom,

I also have several patches that might be useful in 3.5.1. They all are
stability fixes:

r221009: Correctly update dom-tree after loop vectorizer.
r222451: Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll.
r223170 and r223171: PR21302.Vectorize only bottom-tested loops.

Are these patches look ok for 3.5.1?

Thanks,
Michael
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>
wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> ...
>>>> I would like to propose the following additional patches for
3.5.1.  These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the
FreeBSD 11.0 base system.  Apologies in advance for the long list. :)
>> ...
>>> Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval.  It
might
>>> help to send a separate email per code owner.
>> 
>> Hi Renato,
>> 
>> Can you please approve the following revisions for backporting to
3.5.1:
>> 
>> r216989: Only emit movw on ARMv6T2+
>> r216990: Missing test from r216989
>> 
> 
> These both LGTM, go ahead and merge into the 3.5 branch.
> 
> -Tom
> 
>> -Dimitry
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>        
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141203/477c2469/attachment.html>

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:51:07AM -0800, Michael Zolotukhin
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I also have several patches that might be useful in 3.5.1. They all are
stability fixes:
> 
> r221009: Correctly update dom-tree after loop vectorizer.
> r222451: Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll.
> r223170 and r223171: PR21302.Vectorize only bottom-tested loops.
> 
Hi Arnold, Nadav, and Hal

Are these patches OK for the 3.5 branch.  Here are the links:

http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=221009
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=222451
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=223170
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=223171

-Tom
> Are these patches look ok for 3.5.1?
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 
> > On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>
wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >> On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>
wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric
wrote:
> >> ...
> >>>> I would like to propose the following additional patches
for 3.5.1.  These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into
the FreeBSD 11.0 base system.  Apologies in advance for the long list. :)
> >> ...
> >>> Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval. 
It might
> >>> help to send a separate email per code owner.
> >> 
> >> Hi Renato,
> >> 
> >> Can you please approve the following revisions for backporting to
3.5.1:
> >> 
> >> r216989: Only emit movw on ARMv6T2+
> >> r216990: Missing test from r216989
> >> 
> > 
> > These both LGTM, go ahead and merge into the 3.5 branch.
> > 
> > -Tom
> > 
> >> -Dimitry
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>        
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>