similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4.1 - Testing Phase

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:57:32AM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:02:21PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just tagged the first release candidate for the > > 3.4.1 release, so testers may begin testing. Please refer to > > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html for information on how to > > validate a release.

Hi Tom, When running the test script, I got an error message: $ ./test-release.sh -no-64bit -release 3.4.2 -rc 1 -triple armv7a-linux-gnueabihf -j2 # Validating llvm SVN URL llvm 3.4.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist! Do I need to get another test-release.sh script? This is the one from release_34 branch we used to release 3.4.1. cheers, --renato On 16 May 2014 22:55, Tom Stellard

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>

Hi, 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me know. For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation for how validate a new release: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final.

Hi, I have tagged the 3.6.1-rc1 so testing can begin. We can always use more testers, so if you are interested in helping, let me know. Instructions for validating an LLVM release can be found here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Reminder: We are using 3.6.0 as our baseline for regression testing. Thanks, Tom

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and > have the following test results to share. > Summary below, full log at: > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt > > The only edits required were those I

Hi, I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have been two issues identified in 3.4.1, which there is interest in having fixed in a 3.4.x release: 1. Build failure with gcc 4.9 (This is not a regression, 3.4 also fails to build with gcc 4.9). 2. Accidental change of libLLVM's DT_SONAME from libLLVM-3.4 libLLVM-3.4.1.so I will also accept any other bug-fixes that

On 04/14/2014 02:31 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison wrote: > Hi All, > > As kindly pointed by Sebastian, please forget my point about the release > script. I read the mail from Tom 2 days ago, and forgot that the script was > available in the tag / branch when I acted today :( > > I uploaded clang+llvm-3.4.1-rc1-x86_64-unknown-ubuntu12.04.tar.xz to > ftp.llvm.org. >

On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > Tom, > > > > now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three > > fixes or at least merging them to the 3.4 branch? > > I've pushed the two approved patches to the 3.4 branch, can you > verify that they work with gcc

Hi, I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and have the following test results to share. Summary below, full log at: http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt The only edits required were those I posted to llvm-commits yesterday (re: "some missing clang libs"). And I also edited LitConfig.py to point to

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:02:58PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:17:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The number of stable patches has slowed down in the last few weeks, and > > we are approaching the halfway point between 3.3 and 3.4, so I think now > > is a good time to start planning for the 3.3.1 release. Here is the

On 15/05/2014 22:12, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: >> On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote: >> >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: >>>> Tom, >>>> >>>> now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three >>>> fixes

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:57:46AM +0200, Armin Steinhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > first problem was: > > >FileManager.cpp:311:21: error: range-based ‘for’ loops are not allowed > >in C++98 mode > >for (auto & fe: SeenFileEntries) { > >^ > >FileManager.cpp:312:14: error: request for member ‘getValue’ in ‘fe’, > >which is of non-class type ‘int’

Hi, I would like to try again to do stable releases for LLVM 3.4. Even though we were unsuccessful with stable releases for LLVM 3.3, I learned some things going through the process, which I think will increase the chance for success with LLVM 3.4. So, here is my TODO list for a successful 3.4.1 release: 1. Get volunteers to help This is probably the most important thing on this list. Stable

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Would you approve your patches r203146 and r202774 to be backported to > 3.4.1? They fix stability issues in x86 asm. > Hi Robert, I was able to merge r203146, but it used a c++11 feature: std::string::back() which I replaced with std::string::at(std::string::size() - 1). r202774 was not merged,

On 12 May 2014 10:29, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > I suspect 3.4.1 is based off > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/tree/release_34 > > (llvm probably has something similar I suppose?) This is correct. Though, I don't know if anyone tagged 3.4.1 on that branch, but I suspect what was released is the HEAD of that branch. Tom would know

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:17:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > The number of stable patches has slowed down in the last few weeks, and > we are approaching the halfway point between 3.3 and 3.4, so I think now > is a good time to start planning for the 3.3.1 release. Here is the > tentative schedule: > > September 3: 3.3.1-rc1 > - This won't actually be

Hi, The number of stable patches has slowed down in the last few weeks, and we are approaching the halfway point between 3.3 and 3.4, so I think now is a good time to start planning for the 3.3.1 release. Here is the tentative schedule: September 3: 3.3.1-rc1 - This won't actually be a 'real' Release Candidate. The purpose of rc1 will be to update and test the release scripts

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:51:57AM -0500, David Fang wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the quick reply again. > >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >>> have the following test results to share. >>>

No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > > I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > be best to reply to the original