similar to: [LLVMdev] [Reminder] Impending Doom^H^H^H^HLLVM 3.4 Branching!

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > > Good day! > > > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at > this time: > > > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November > 19, 2013 at 3:00:00

Hi Bill, Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? Thanks, Chad On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! > 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 > GMT > What this means for you: > Please keep a watch on all of your

This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT What this means for you: Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly. Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:59:25PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Jack, > > Where do the "-isysroot > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk > -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your > CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this > being done

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > This is just a reminder to say that we will be branching for the LLVM 3.0 release Friday! > > 07:00:00 p.m. Friday October 14, 2011 PDT > 02:00:00 a.m. Saturday October 15, 2011 GMT Hi Bill, I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. Will you be sending out an announcement when the split is finished and such patches can be

This is just a reminder that we will be branching today at 7PM PDT (2AM GMT). Please pay close attention to the build bots and fix any issues which arise. Share and enjoy! -bw

Chad Colgur <colgur at gmail.com> writes: > Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be but I'm not a git-svn expert. My very short reading of the git-svn manpage makes

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > Good day! > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC > > What this means for you! > ------------------------ > > * Please keep the release notes up to date --

Good day! This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC What this means for you! ------------------------ * Please keep the release notes up to date -- There has been very few commits to them. Please be proactive and update them with any significant feature that was

On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:01 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > Chad Colgur <colgur at gmail.com> writes: > >> Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? > > I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror > documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme > in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be

This is just a reminder to say that we will be branching for the LLVM 3.0 release Friday! 07:00:00 p.m. Friday October 14, 2011 PDT 02:00:00 a.m. Saturday October 15, 2011 GMT Now is the time to look at the buildbots and see what fixes they need: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console As of this writing, we have: • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host:

Jack, Where do the "-isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this being done on purpose? I can add a CMake step checking whether the current CFLAGS/LDFLAGS allow to build an

This is a reminder that the branch date for the LLVM 2.8 release is next Friday (September 3rd). Please try to finish up any major changes you have so that they get a sufficient amount of "bake time" before the branch. As Friday approaches, please keep the top-of-tree as stable as possible. September 3rd is not the final date for code submissions. We will allow submissions to fix bugs

Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> writes: > It doesn't work because git-svn assumes that all of your branches > begin at the same position in the SVN tree, i.e. llvm/branches/*. The > problem is that we have some branches in llvm/branches/*, some in > llvm/branches/Apple/*, some in llvm/branches/ggrief/*, etc. The end > result is that git-svn gets horribly confused.

Hi Bill, > As of this writing, we have: > > • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost/builds/25 I can reproduce this here. I'll poke at it this weekend sometime. > • a miscompile in one of the llvm-gcc testers: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-linux-checks/builds/55 > >

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. Of course I meant post-3.0 only. -Dave

On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. > > Of course I meant post-3.0 only. > Yes, I'll send out a message when it's okay to submit post-3.0 patches. -bw

Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: >> What options were used with git-svn init?  It certainly can support >> multiple branch/tag directories: >> >> init >>  --tags=<tags_subdir> >>  --branches=<branches_subdir> >> >>  You can specify more than one --tags and/or --branches options, in >>  case your

NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> writes: > Matthieu, > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthieu Moy > <Matthieu.Moy at grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >> At some point in the past, an anti-git-svn system had been set up on >> llvm.org. Has this been disabled since? I don't manage to do much with >> git-svn: > > Maybe sure. Anton said it is

Matthieu, On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: > At some point in the past, an anti-git-svn system had been set up on > llvm.org. Has this been disabled since? I don't manage to do much with > git-svn: Maybe sure. Anton said it is disabled to access upper directories with svn. Thus, we (accessing llvm.org remotely) cannot do