Owen Anderson
2011-Feb-28 18:10 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:01 AM, David A. Greene wrote:> Chad Colgur <colgur at gmail.com> writes: > >> Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? > > I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror > documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme > in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be but I'm > not a git-svn expert.It doesn't work because git-svn assumes that all of your branches begin at the same position in the SVN tree, i.e. llvm/branches/*. The problem is that we have some branches in llvm/branches/*, some in llvm/branches/Apple/*, some in llvm/branches/ggrief/*, etc. The end result is that git-svn gets horribly confused. --Owen
David A. Greene
2011-Feb-28 19:22 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> writes:> It doesn't work because git-svn assumes that all of your branches > begin at the same position in the SVN tree, i.e. llvm/branches/*. The > problem is that we have some branches in llvm/branches/*, some in > llvm/branches/Apple/*, some in llvm/branches/ggrief/*, etc. The end > result is that git-svn gets horribly confused.But all of the public-facing branches (I think RELEASE_* are the only branches most people care about) are in llvm/tags/* (or will be in llvm/tags/RELEASE_29/* for 2.9), right? So I guess it will be a problem if 3.0 is in llvm/tags/RELEASE_30/*. This is perhaps one reason not to use the branching scheme Bill proposed. That's not a very satisfactory result. -Dave
David A. Greene
2011-Feb-28 19:25 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> writes:> It doesn't work because git-svn assumes that all of your branches > begin at the same position in the SVN tree, i.e. llvm/branches/*. The > problem is that we have some branches in llvm/branches/*, some in > llvm/branches/Apple/*, some in llvm/branches/ggrief/*, etc. The end > result is that git-svn gets horribly confused.What options were used with git-svn init? It certainly can support multiple branch/tag directories: init --tags=<tags_subdir> --branches=<branches_subdir> You can specify more than one --tags and/or --branches options, in case your Subversion repository places tags or branches under multiple paths. -Dave
Owen Anderson
2011-Feb-28 19:30 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:25 AM, David A. Greene wrote:> What options were used with git-svn init? It certainly can support > multiple branch/tag directories: > > init > --tags=<tags_subdir> > --branches=<branches_subdir> > > You can specify more than one --tags and/or --branches options, in > case your Subversion repository places tags or branches under multiple > paths.I don't remember exactly what we tried, but as I recall it was the fact that some of the branch directories were nested inside another branch directory that got it all confused. --Owen
Anton Korobeynikov
2011-Feb-28 19:39 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
>> I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror >> documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme >> in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be but I'm >> not a git-svn expert. > > It doesn't work because git-svn assumes that all of your branches begin at the same position in the SVN tree, i.e. llvm/branches/*. The problem is that we have some branches in llvm/branches/*, some in llvm/branches/Apple/*, some in llvm/branches/ggrief/*, etc. The end result is that git-svn gets horribly confused.Same for tags. And current 2-level system will make stuff even worse as it seems :) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Anton Korobeynikov
2011-Feb-28 19:58 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
> What options were used with git-svn init? It certainly can support > multiple branch/tag directories: > > init > --tags=<tags_subdir> > --branches=<branches_subdir> > > You can specify more than one --tags and/or --branches options, in > case your Subversion repository places tags or branches under multiple > paths.The svn repository is free to checkout. So, if you'll find a reasonable combination of cmdline options (which will provide release branches / tags only), then please let us know and we'll add the branches/tags to the repository as well. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week