similar to: [LLVMdev] [llvm-c] LLVMAttribute possible bug

While writing bindings to LLVM for another language via the c api I noticed that LLVMAlignment and LLVMStackAlignment do not use 1<<x like all the others, but 31<<x and 7<x respectively (see below, or here: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Core_8h_source.html#l00148). It's likely this is as it is intended, but it does look out-of-place enough that I thought it might be a

On Mar 13, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Moritz Maxeiner <moritzmaxeiner at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously > need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and > signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? > > Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g.

On Mar 13, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Moritz Maxeiner <moritzmaxeiner at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> LLVM's license includes a binary redistribution clause: >> http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license > > Hi Chris, > > the problem with the binary redistribution clause is that the bindings will not be linked with

On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > LLVM's license includes a binary redistribution clause: > http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license Hi Chris, the problem with the binary redistribution clause is that the bindings will not be linked with any part of LLVM. The bindings will load an LLVM shared library (dll/so/dylib) at runtime and thus an application compiled

Hi, If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g. Analysis.h, BitReader.h, Core.h, etc.) my bindings only have three files constants.d, types.d and functions.d which respectively

I would like to use the LLVM-C bindings to provide LLVM access with an OO-design in another language (D), e.g. map from the C API back up to a D API that closely resembles the original C++ API. Since I would like to have D (with its own exception system) to handle the IO, I need a new C API function (unless there is one and I haven't found it): LLVMBool

Dear all, I am doing a one way between subjects anova in an unbalanced data set. Suppose we have "a" levels of the one factor. I want to merge the not so significantly different levels into the same cluster. Can I do a Tukey Kramer HSD and then use the following algorithm: For i in 2 : "a" For j in 1 : i-1 if mean of level i is not significantly different

Hello again, the same can be done with textpad and adjustments in preferences/file also changes owner when a file is changed and saved. greetings jens Kramer -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Willem Jaap Zwart [mailto:W.J.Zwart@NescioLudens.nl] Gesendet: Freitag, 8. April 2005 16:55 An: Kramer Jens ZFF ISAC Cc: samba@samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.10 and higher Hi We noticed

Hi Samba User Group Maybe that's a stupid question, however i have a severe problem with that. I'm running samba 2.0.4b on suse linux 6.1 and windows nt4 sp4, german version. I need the domain admin to be a member of the local admin group, If I log into the local domain as admin I cannot add the domain admin to the local admin group, because of miising privledges in the domain. If I log

Hi, when building llvm as a shared library LLVMInitializeNativeTarget and co. (located in llvm/Support/TargetSelect) will not get exported as symbol into the shared library, because they are static inline. Since they are functions defined in the C API no one else inside LLVM calls them, which results in them not being exported. This is, of course, no problem for C programs using the C API,

Better be quick! I am adding FMA4 and XOP now, and if you contribute code before I do, you can spare yourself some XOP merging. - Jan ----- Original Message ----- > From: David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> > To: Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 12:19 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Hello, I am performing a BACI analysis with ANOVA using the following glm: fit1<-glm(log(Cucs_m+1)~(BA*Otter)+BA+Otter+ID+Primary, data=b1) The summary(aov(fit1)) shows significance in the interaction; however, now I would like to determine what combinations of BA and Otter are significantly different (each factor has two levels). ID and PRIMARY substrates are categorical and included in

On Jun 17, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17.06.2013, at 15:56, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-06-15 16:39 , Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>> Do you want to take over this effort or should I poke more at it? >> >> Since you've already started, it's easier if you poke more at

On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at

The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine when a new object is emitted, but the profiling listeners do not do anything with the events (and I don't expect they will before the 3.2 release becomes official). I have implemented some code in trunk since the 3.2 branch to traverse the emitted object and pick out named functions in the IntelJITEventsListener. An

[Splitting this out from the original thread to reduce noise in it] On 17.06.2013, at 18:43, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 17.06.2013, at 15:56, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-06-15 16:39 ,

Post-hoc test for a zero inflated continuous data set with a tweedie distribution? I have a zero inflated continuous data set of aphid feeding duration on 10+ species of plant. I have fitted a glm model with a tweedie distribution and used anova() function to show that there is significance between the plant species. However, I would now like to perform of post-hoc test, ideally a Tukey-Kramer

Ops. I meant to say 3.1. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Manny Ko Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:27 AM To: Eli Bendersky Cc: Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the

Success at r168899. Thanks! /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lattner [mailto:sabre at nondot.org] Sent: den 29 november 2012 17:13 To: Patrik Hägglund H Cc: criswell at illinois.edu; Benjamin Kramer; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Tobias Grosser; LLVM Development List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lost commit mails On Nov 29, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > >