Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Scilab to Verilog"
2010 Aug 03
1
Bug#591537: xen: FTBFS on sparc: Scilab cannot open JVM library.
Source: xen
Version: 4.0.1~rc5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc
Hi,
your package no longer builds on sparc:
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sivp_0.5.2-2-sparc-3aHxSt/sivp-0.5.2'
| SCI_DISABLE_TK=1 SCI_JAVA_ENABLE_HEADLESS=1 DOCBOOK_ROOT=/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh \
| /usr/bin/scilab -nw -f
2012 Feb 18
1
PATCH: Port equalloudfilt.m MATLAB to scilab
Although the script doesn't generate identical results, it seems to get fairly close.
The deviations for the Butterworth filter settings seem larger than for the equal loudness filter.
This script requires OpenSource scilab which is available for Windows, Linux and MacOS.
http://www.scilab.org/products/scilab/download
Earl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2012 Nov 08
1
the results of the SORT function differ from Scilab/Matlab for Complex Numbers
Hello useRs,
The results of the SORT function differ from Scilab/Matlab for Complex
Numbers in my example.
This design is the desirable in R?
Thanks.
Cleber
r <- c(
1.7507+0.1689i, 1.7507-0.1689i, 1.3886+0.0000i, 1.0458+0.0792i,
1.0458-0.0792i,
0.8279+0.1861i, 0.8279-0.1861i, 0.8263+0.3731i, 0.8263-0.3731i,
0.6548+0.0000i
)
> cbind(sort(r, d=T))
[,1]
[1,]
2017 Oct 11
12
[Bug 103217] New: Recent noveau causes errors with scilab 5.5.2 on NVIDIA G84GL [Quadro FX 570]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103217
Bug ID: 103217
Summary: Recent noveau causes errors with scilab 5.5.2 on
NVIDIA G84GL [Quadro FX 570]
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component:
2010 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] Scilab-to-LLVM Google Summer of Code project
See http://wiki.scilab.org/Contributor_-_LLVM
Ciao,
Duncan.
2013 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Reflexions about a new HDL language
If you're designing a new high-level HDL, then it would be a good idea to familiarise yourself with the state of the art in this area (e.g. Bluespec System Verilog, Symbolics Processor Designer, and similar tools). Starting from comparisons to VHDL and Verilog is like designing a new high-level programming language today that is designed to be a better high-level programming language that is
2008 Dec 29
1
[LLVMdev] Enhancing the Trident compiler
Hi Nico,
Yes, that's true! :-) I just listed it in order of
short-comings of the existing compiler.
I've been reading up on existing tools, and it would appear that a
couple of commercial tools exist, most notably Xilinx AutoESL, which
supports C, C++, SystemC and M-code. Others support better C
functionality, e.g. c-to-verilog, which does not have the current
2013 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] Reflexions about a new HDL language
Hello,
I previously sent this message, but it was in HTML only, so it was
unreadable.
I am thinking about making a compiler for a new HDL language, that will
be more modern than VHDL and Verilog and allow a little higher level
behavioral description than VHDL. For this language, I am beeing
influenced by VHDL, Ada, Ruby and MyHDL. I also would like to write it
in Ada.
I don't know if it
2011 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] Vlang - TR : LLVM and VHDL simulation
Hi Jonas,
>Thanks for your answers.
>
>In one year, I am going to have something like a semester project.
>The idea I have for this project would be to create (for simulation only) a VHDL front-end to LLVM, compile some VHDL code with the newly created compilator and also with a commercial compilator and simulator and compare the performance of both simulations. I won't have the
2008 Dec 29
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing the Trident compiler
Hi,
I'm not sure, but I think you should do point 'e' first - unless you
want to implement 'a' to 'd' first for 1.5 and then again for 2.4.
Best regards,
Nico
On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> Hi,
> Would anyone happen to know if there are any efforts underway
> at enhancing the Trident compiler?
>
> Some of the things that I
2008 Dec 29
2
[LLVMdev] Enhancing the Trident compiler
Hi,
Would anyone happen to know if there are any efforts underway
at enhancing the Trident compiler?
Some of the things that I would like to add to the Trident compiler
are :
a. Support for compiling multiple C functions in an input file
b. Support for parameter passing
c. Support for functions returning results
d. Support for a C++ front end, and C++ objects
e. Updating the trident
2013 Aug 30
4
[LLVMdev] Reflexions about a new HDL language
Hi,
For the synthesis backend which translate to VHDL or Verilog, I don't
know if I will use LLVM. It will depend on how easy it is to play with
concurrent statements with LLVM. For the simulation I will use LLVM
because I can anyways artificially make the compiled code sequencial. It
would allow me to benefit from all the nice things from LLVM like
existing optimisations. I have never
2011 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] Vlang - TR : LLVM and VHDL simulation
Hi Pavel,
> If you are interested in HDLs perhaps you would be interested in Vlang?
> I am currently working on Verilog fronted and I am looking for somebody with
> VHDL interest to join the Vlang project.
I have never heard about the Vlang project but it seems to be an interesting project. I think I
could be interested to join this project and do the VHDL front-end.
However, there are
2013 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Some reflexions about a new HDL language
2008 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] C-to-verilog
Hello,
I wanted to tell the LLVM developers list about http://www.c-to-verilog.com.
I created this website to provide free on-line compilation of C into
Verilog. I use LLVM as the C parser and optimizer. I have been working on
this project for 2 years now.
I would like to thank Chris, Vikram and the rest of the LLVM developers. I
am very happy with the LLVM infrastructure, documentation, and
2004 Sep 10
1
VHDL Implementation?
I'm currently looking to start my working on my major project for
College. I want to create an audio CD archival/ playback server. There
will be a base server and also several satellite players. I will be
building a secondary server for my car. And in the car power is at a
premium so I wanted true hardware support (unlike phatnoise which is
software based). The car will support both
2007 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Sarah Thompson wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that there is nothing that the current gcc
> front end generates that wouldn't fit an old-style GenericValue? I'm
> wondering if this might be an interim approach that would avoid me
> needing to rewrite huge amounts of code, and since we're not likely to
> be supporting anything other than C and C++
2013 Jul 04
1
Hardware design of an Opus IP
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if there would be interest in having a hardware IP
implementing Opus (hardware as in VHDL/Verilog description)? Does that
make sense?
Several companies that seem to have an interest in Opus (such as Skype,
Mozilla, Broadcom, Orange, Huawei) could thus have a dedicated,
efficient, low-power solution for phones and tablets.
As LTE is being deployed en masse, it
2001 Jul 11
1
Hardware Vorbis
There is a 'feeling' on the opencores list that an audio decoder is desired.
(MP3 gets mentioned occasionally, but has its patent problems etc...)
http://www.opencores.org/ no audio projects are underway yet and I think a
vorbis decoder will take a while but even if only a start is made then
others may add to it.
For their one year anniversary they will actually be doing a chip run and
2007 Jul 17
3
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:05 -0700, Sarah Thompson wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been quiet for a while, but I'm liable to be less so now that I'm
>> starting on porting our model checker from LLVM 1.8 to 2.0.
>>
>
> We missed you! :)
>
>
Yes, apologies again for not making the