similar to: [LLVMdev] Generate data16 assembly instruction for TLS with PIC

Hey Cameron, Sorry to reply this mail so late. Recently, I tried to understand what's the impact of the warning message (Warning: stand-alone `data16' prefix) And in binutils (gas/config/tc-i386.c), I found: if (!quiet_warnings) { ..... if (t->opcode_modifier.isprefix && t->opcode_modifier.ignoresize) { /* Warn them that a data or address

Hi all I saw presentation http://www.softlab.ntua.gr/~gtsiour/files/erllvm_pres-20111107.pdf and I have couple question to the HiPE calling convention. I am trying to enable HiPE call for Rust compiler. That presentation mentioned that: Virtual registers with “special” use, pinned to hardware registers (unallocatable). VM Register AMD64 Register Native stack pointer %nsp Heap

NOTE: posted this to gluster-devel when I meant to post it to gluster-users 01 | 02 mirrored --| 03 | 04 mirrored --| distributed 05 | 06 mirrored --| 1) Would this command work for that? glusterfs-volgen --name repstore1 --raid 1 clustr-01:/mnt/data01 clustr-02:/mnt/data01 --raid 1 clustr-03:/mnt/data01 clustr-04:/mnt/data01 --raid 1 clustr-05:/mnt/data01 clustr-06:/mnt/data01 So the

On Apr 27, 2007, at 3:50 PM, David Greene wrote: > The saga continues. > > I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with > the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 > of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: > > > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs > >

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2033 Summary: ''zfs create'' causes panic if key file doesn''t exist Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> Some linker scripts were splitted into i386 and x86_64 versions in commit d8eede3f2a360163235fad222a0190cd7c5bef38 but older scripts were left there. Signed-off-by: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> --- core/syslinux.ld | 414 ------------------------------------------------ core/x86_64/syslinux.ld | 389

thank you for your quick answer, I'm far of the digits capacity and my values are not the result of a computation. I'm developping a R package to acces a specific data source. And I need precision a few better. How can I do ? When I try this In R console, this is correct and what I need : > my_value <- 29.958334 > my_value == 29.958334 [1] TRUE But I need to do the first

ok, sorry, my mistake was the C printf. Thank you for your good answer Regards ----- Message d'origine ---- De : JS Ubei <jsubei at yahoo.fr> ? : jim holtman <jholtman at gmail.com> Cc : r-help at r-project.org Envoy? le : Jeudi, 17 Juillet 2008, 15h25mn 07s Objet : [R] Re : float and double precision with C code thank you for your quick answer, I'm far of the digits

Hy guys, Inside my app I have a form which contains user information. Sometimes a have a form with a text_field as above: <%= form_remote_tag(:html => { :action => url_for(:controller => "my_controller", :action => "my_action") }) %> <%= text_field(''my_object'', ''my_parameter'', :maxlength =>

Hello, I would like to read sets of files within a folder, perhaps using recursive methods. Right now, I rename the files before import. It would be even better to do this without renaming files, without providing explicit filenames, perhaps by importing files based on chronology, and translating each filename into a header? Please excuse my ignorance, and help cure my clunky programming

Chris Lattner wrote: > I don't understand. You're making a claim that the C compiler isn't > producing optimal code for some case. Can you give an example of a C > function that llvm compiles to something suboptimal? LLVM certainly does > generate stuff like "jmp %eax", but presumably not in the way you want. > Without an example to see what you mean, we

Hi, There's a quite complex dialplan scenario and I found out that CDR of main channel is flushed right after hangup on Local channel. I will try to simplify my scenario: [incoming] exten => 555,1,Noop(do something before using local channel, fill some variables, play IVR menus and so on) same => n,Dial(Local/555 at office/n,,g) same => n,Noop(Notice the option "/n" and

Hi *, Missed it by that '''' much... or something to brighten everyone''s Friday. This is just a heads up since I suspect others will run into it. bob Consider the possibilities of a device named star. I added devices from the global zone to the bug zone in the usual way and rebooted the zone: <device match="/dev/zvol/rdsk/bug/devices/*"/> And I got

Adam Jackson (1): Revert "Compose sequences for rouble sign" Alan Coopersmith (6): specs/libX11: More synopsis fixes specs/libX11: Fix paramdef entries listing multiple parameters specs/libX11: Make paramdef spacing more consistent specs/libX11: Add missing parameter types for XGetWindowProperty() specs/libX11: Fix broken synopsis for

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:13:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Do all six fixed isohdp*.bin variations still fit into 432 bytes ? > > mbr/Makefile builds among other MBRs: > isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin > isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin Yes. I make my changes in my syslinux git clone. All of the above is build from isohdpfx.S with

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I have some problems understanding the details of the program's flow. > > - The code inside PARTITION_SUPPORT is supposed to be inactive with > MBR isohdpfx.bin. It belongs to isohybrid --partok which is equivalent > to MBRs isohdppx*.bin. Debian uses isohdpfx.bin. Yes. isohdpfx.bin is generated from isohdpfx.S in which PARTITION_SUPPORT is not

After the upgrade my memory usage is shown like this: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4592 flipl 16 0 197m 150m 2360 S 0.0 14.9 6:17.28 mongrel_rails 4585 mongrel 16 0 190m 140m 1756 S 0.0 13.9 0:52.86 mongrel_rails 4579 mongrel 16 0 200m 157m 1752 S 0.0 15.5 0:56.31 mongrel_rails 4582 mongrel 16 0 189m 139m 1752 S 0.0 13.8

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Songmao <smtian at ingenic.cn> wrote: > Michael, >    I have rework the patch according to your suggestion.  And I have read > binutil/objdump source code and found that it has a logic that if there's no > symtab, it will use dynsym, which is missing in llvm-objdump. > > Songmao > @@ -747,12 +747,28 @@ error_code

Most probably you need to properly specify the calling convention the backend is using for calling the runtime functions. Or implement the stub for udivti3 that performs the necessary argument lifting. I guess there is no standard ABI document describing the intended calling convention here, so I'd just do what mingw64 does here and make everything here compatible. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at

On 1/23/2017 09:17, Rick Miller via Syslinux wrote: > Hi all, > > I currently use iPXE to load memdisk and, subsequently, a FreeBSD disk > image to perform an OS installation to disk. This works great in BIOS, but > upcoming requirements make UEFI a prerequisite. Because memdisk is not > UEFI-aware, new UEFI-aware media is necessary. The current plan is to > integrate the