similar to: [LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32"

2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 20:18 +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > >Da: hfinkel at anl.gov > >Data: 02/12/2011 16.27 > >A: "acrux_it at libero.it"<acrux_it at libero.it> > >Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Ogg: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32 > > > >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:15 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>
2011 Dec 02
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 06:58 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > Nico, > > There is a third place that '#undef PPC' is needed (at the top of > PPCFixupKinds.h). Alternatively, you can run configure with -UPPC in > your CPPFLAGS. I'll try to get this fixed in trunk shortly. I just tested this, and I was wrong: passing -UPPC to configure in CPPFLAGS does not work for some reason.
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
Nico, There is a third place that '#undef PPC' is needed (at the top of PPCFixupKinds.h). Alternatively, you can run configure with -UPPC in your CPPFLAGS. I'll try to get this fixed in trunk shortly. -Hal On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:30 +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > hi, i just try to build llvm-3.0 (stable) on linux ppc32 (CRUX PPC 2.7) with > gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1,
2011 Dec 02
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
hi, i just try to build llvm-3.0 (stable) on linux ppc32 (CRUX PPC 2.7) with gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1, glibc-2.12.2 . As this suggestion: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10969 I applied a patch like this one: --- llvm-3.0.src/lib/Target/PowerPC/MCTargetDesc/PPCMCTargetDesc.h 2011-07-26 01:24:55.000000000 +0200 +++ llvm-3.0.src/lib/Target/PowerPC/MCTargetDesc/PPCMCTargetDesc.h
2011 Dec 15
2
[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:23:07 -0600 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: _omissis__ > > > > ciao Hal, > > thanks a lot for your support. > > i'll try your last suggestion. > > > > Btw, adding -UPPC to my system cxx flags i.e.: > > export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -UPPC" > > > > i got, instead, some tests error: > >
2011 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:02 +0100, acrux wrote: > On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:23:07 -0600 > Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > _omissis__ > > > > > > ciao Hal, > > > thanks a lot for your support. > > > i'll try your last suggestion. > > > > > > Btw, adding -UPPC to my system cxx flags i.e.: > > > export
2011 Dec 02
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:28 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:30:29PM +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > > +// Generated files will use "namespace PPC". To avoid symbol clash, > > +// undefine PPC here. PPC may be predefined on some hosts. > > +#undef PPC > > + > > I wonder if it shouldn't just be renamed to PowerPC
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:30:29PM +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > +// Generated files will use "namespace PPC". To avoid symbol clash, > +// undefine PPC here. PPC may be predefined on some hosts. > +#undef PPC > + I wonder if it shouldn't just be renamed to PowerPC everywhere. It's not that much longer. Joerg
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:59:47AM -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:28 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:30:29PM +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > > > +// Generated files will use "namespace PPC". To avoid symbol clash, > > > +// undefine PPC here. PPC may be predefined on some hosts. > > > +#undef
2010 Mar 03
1
using upscode2 driver with Powerware 5119 RM
I've got a Powerware 5119 RM UPS. driver.list says to use "genericups upstype=20", however I know this UPS supports the UPS Code II protocol, so I wanted to use the upscode2 driver. It took some hacking but finally it works. I'm using NUT 2.4.1 and upscode2 driver version 0.87 (however the latest r2350 version of upscode2.c isn't significantly different, so I think all
2008 Mar 27
3
kernel memory and zfs
We have a 32 GB RAM server running about 14 zones. There are multiple databases, application servers, web servers, and ftp servers running in the various zones. I understand that using ZFS will increase kernel memory usage, however I am a bit concerned at this point. root at servername:~/zonecfg #mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace uppc pcplusmp ufs md mpt ip indmux ptm
2011 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] undef PPC
2011/10/6 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > Were the patches to insert some "#undef PPC" lines ever committed? They > appeared on the commit list, but the changes don't seem to be in trunk. > > Specifically, I'm referring to: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/99549 I don't think it might be obvious. I am dubious in my own style.
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-3.0rc2 build error on linux/ppc
Nello,it is known issue ;) You may work around to add -UPPC. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10969 FYI, LLVM RC2 passes on ppc-linux. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/125 ...Takumi
2006 Oct 31
0
6352071 MDB ::interrupts need not display non-ISR entries on x86
Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: ca260b8c8934dc34091622676f0a58662e217e74 Log message: 6352071 MDB ::interrupts need not display non-ISR entries on x86 6354060 Add ::interrupts support for uppc(7d) based systems Files: create: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/Makefile create: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/amd64/Makefile create:
2009 Jan 29
1
Fwd: upscode2.c
----- Doorgestuurd bericht van dkbrig at gmail.com ----- Datum: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:16:06 -0600 Van: Danny <dkbrig at gmail.com> Onderwerp: upscode2.c Aan: adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org Hi, I apologize if you are not the correct person, but I was wanting to submit a bug report for the upscode2.c driver but could not find a way to do that from the NUT website.
2006 Oct 31
0
6427444 add ::softint support for x64
Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: dd242801250e0f77ff81a2cde19ac40dec0d88af Log message: 6427444 add ::softint support for x64 Files: update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/mdb/mdb_ks.h update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/modules/mdb_ks/mdb_ks.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/pcplusmp/apic.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/intr_common.c update:
2011 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] [release_30] ppc-redhat-linux (fedora 12 ps3)
It can pass on trunk. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/91/steps/test_llvm/logs/stdio Note: You still need to add -UPPC on configure or make. Clang tests will not let passed for me. There might be many issues. It fails on some point on release_30. r143303 in release_30 http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/92/steps/test_llvm/logs/stdio Failing Tests (5): * LLVM ::
2006 Jun 06
0
ppc32: "Relocation truncated to fit"
Hello ppc32 users, I think I finally got the "official" answer on the ppc32 problem. Apparently some distributions build binutils so that it defaults to elf32ppc emulation rather than elf32ppclinux. This doesn't matter when using gcc, since gcc overrides the emulation explicitly, but it does matter when invoking ld directly like klibc does. This patch should hopefully take
2008 Feb 01
4
[Bug 10547] nouveau: __ucmpdi2 unresolved on ppc32
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 --- Comment #6 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> 2008-02-01 11:16:02 PST --- I've not heard people complain about this recently, is it still an issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
2006 Feb 22
1
CentOS 4.3 for ppc32
A while back, there was mention that the release of CentOS 4.3 would bring a ppc32 version. Is this still in the works? If so, is it scheduled to be released at the same time as the more popular releases, or at a later time? Thanks, Barry