similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 Has Been Branched

On 10/15/2011 05:02 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > The LLVM 3.0 release branch has been tagged. You may now commit patches at your leisure. Could we have a release_30 branch in git tracking the SVN release_30 branch? Thanks, --Edwin

> Could we have a release_30 branch in git tracking the SVN release_30 branch? Added for {llvm,clang,compiler-rt,dragonegg}.git Let me know if I missed something :) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: >> Could we have a release_30 branch in git tracking the SVN release_30 branch? > Added for {llvm,clang,compiler-rt,dragonegg}.git Let me know if I > missed something :) Do we branch the test suite? Err...do we even have a test suite git mirror? -Dave

Hi all, We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No patches will be accepted into the 3.1 release without prior approval! This should be a great release! :-) -bw

how to get this branch? still svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm? Thank you. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!) > > If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please > contact the code owners

As you all have undoubtedly noticed, I recently did Yet Another Merge to Apple's GCC top-of-tree. This merge was prompted by several important fixes in the "blocks" implementation. There are still many testcases that need to be moved over, but those can come at our leisure. I compiled both the "Apple way" and the "FSF way". It also passed the tests in

Hi Anton, On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Sebastian, > >> I just saw that the git branch remotes/origin/release_31 has been created >> for llvm.  Unfortunately it is missing the right context: right now I can only >> see 11 patches in that branch with the last patch having no parent. >> >> Could

Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch? -bw On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. >> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? >>

Should be there On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:00 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > Anton, please add release_32 also in; > > clang-tools-extra > compiler-rt > dragonegg > libcxxabi > lldb > > They have release_32 in svn. I don't know they might be released, though. > > And, could you suppress generating refs/heads/svn-tags and prune them

Anton, please add release_32 also in; clang-tools-extra compiler-rt dragonegg libcxxabi lldb They have release_32 in svn. I don't know they might be released, though. And, could you suppress generating refs/heads/svn-tags and prune them for now? I am sure that orphan branches will stress the llvm.org server to begin git-pack-ing whole tree. ...Takumi 2012/11/15 Anton Korobeynikov

I'm getting the error below on Ubuntu Hardy on ia32 on r55688. John make[3]: Entering directory `/home/regehr/llvm-gcc/build/gcc' gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc

Good day! This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC What this means for you! ------------------------ * Please keep the release notes up to date -- There has been very few commits to them. Please be proactive and update them with any significant feature that was

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch? r142994 is necessary; I thought I already sent you an email about that. r142998 only touches the release notes; it looks like you're hacking on those on trunk. -Eli > On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin

On 2009-09-06 20:52, Bill Wendling wrote: > The problem he's facing here isn't necessarily one of correctness. > He's dealing with undefined behavior (at least in C code). There are > no guarantees that the compiler will retain a certain semantic > interpretation of an undefined construct between different versions of > the compiler, let alone different

On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 02:13 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I’m sorry for the late announcement. >> >> The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please >> pick them up here and test them out! >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/ > > Can somebody

On Sep 15, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> Release testing of Release Candidate 1 is finished. I'll be tagging >> Release Candidate 2 tonight. If there are any fixes you want in, please >> get them approved as soon as possible. > > Are there any tarballs for the release candidates available? Tanya used > to make these available

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > Good day! > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC > > What this means for you! > ------------------------ > > * Please keep the release notes up to date --

The tree has been broken since late last night. This is completely unacceptable! We have had check-ins which didn't even COMPILE! The build bots have been complaining all night, but no one has bothered to look at their messages and figure out whether it was their patches that caused the problem. This wastes a huge amount of time trying to figure out what's going on. In the future, it may

Good day! To get ready for the release, we need to make sure that the list of external open source projects using LLVM 3.0 (file:///Volumes/Sandbox/llvm/llvm.src/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj) is up to date. Please send me an email with the project's name and a short description of it. Alternatively, if the project was commented out and you would still like to be listed, just tell me

Hi, I'm having difficulty with getting a table to show with multiple rows and columns. Below is the commands that I've typed in and errors that I am getting. Thank you. Laura Table trying to enter: Diet: Binger-yes: Binger-No: Total: None 24 134 158 Healthy 9 52 61 Unhealthy 23 72 95 Dangerous 12 15 27 >