similar to: [LLVMdev] undef PPC

2011/10/6 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > Were the patches to insert some "#undef PPC" lines ever committed? They > appeared on the commit list, but the changes don't seem to be in trunk. > > Specifically, I'm referring to: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/99549 I don't think it might be obvious. I am dubious in my own style.

Good morning. LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. On RC1, only one test failed. test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. (I don't mention clang tests :p ) ...Takumi Fedora release 12 (Constantine) Linux speedking.localdomain 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 17:09:35 UTC 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux llvm

i just tried to build llvm-3.0rc2 on my powerpc (G4) but without success. My toolchain (CRUX PPC 2.7): gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1, glibc-2.12.2, libffi-3.0.10 my llvm config: ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/man \ --enable-shared \ --enable-libffi --enable-optimize \ --enable-targets=all \ --enable-threads --enable-pic --enable-jit \

On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:25 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good morning. > Hi Nakamura, > LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. > Hooray! :-) > On RC1, only one test failed. > test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll > Eric commented that this should be fixed on the release branch right now. > On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. Woo! :-) >

Nello,it is known issue ;) You may work around to add -UPPC. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10969 FYI, LLVM RC2 passes on ppc-linux. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/125 ...Takumi

On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 06:58 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > Nico, > > There is a third place that '#undef PPC' is needed (at the top of > PPCFixupKinds.h). Alternatively, you can run configure with -UPPC in > your CPPFLAGS. I'll try to get this fixed in trunk shortly. I just tested this, and I was wrong: passing -UPPC to configure in CPPFLAGS does not work for some reason.

hi, i just try to build llvm-3.0 (stable) on linux ppc32 (CRUX PPC 2.7) with gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1, glibc-2.12.2 . As this suggestion: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10969 I applied a patch like this one: --- llvm-3.0.src/lib/Target/PowerPC/MCTargetDesc/PPCMCTargetDesc.h 2011-07-26 01:24:55.000000000 +0200 +++ llvm-3.0.src/lib/Target/PowerPC/MCTargetDesc/PPCMCTargetDesc.h

>Da: hfinkel at anl.gov >Data: 02/12/2011 16.27 >A: "acrux_it at libero.it"<acrux_it at libero.it> >Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Ogg: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32 > >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:15 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 06:58 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >> > Nico, >> > >> >

Nico, There is a third place that '#undef PPC' is needed (at the top of PPCFixupKinds.h). Alternatively, you can run configure with -UPPC in your CPPFLAGS. I'll try to get this fixed in trunk shortly. -Hal On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:30 +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > hi, i just try to build llvm-3.0 (stable) on linux ppc32 (CRUX PPC 2.7) with > gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1,

On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 20:18 +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > >Da: hfinkel at anl.gov > >Data: 02/12/2011 16.27 > >A: "acrux_it at libero.it"<acrux_it at libero.it> > >Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Ogg: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32 > > > >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:15 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>

On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:23:07 -0600 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: _omissis__ > > > > ciao Hal, > > thanks a lot for your support. > > i'll try your last suggestion. > > > > Btw, adding -UPPC to my system cxx flags i.e.: > > export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -UPPC" > > > > i got, instead, some tests error: > >

It can pass on trunk. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/91/steps/test_llvm/logs/stdio Note: You still need to add -UPPC on configure or make. Clang tests will not let passed for me. There might be many issues. It fails on some point on release_30. r143303 in release_30 http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-ppc-linux/builds/92/steps/test_llvm/logs/stdio Failing Tests (5): * LLVM ::

Hello all: In a quest to resolve the last apparent timing problems I am having with SpanDSP I am trying out some PPC hardware, specifically a B&W G3. I am running gentoo-ppc on this system and have compiled spandsp 0.0.2pre6 along with a release version of asterisk. Zaptel device (T100P) is configured and appears to be ready to go. When loading asterisk it crashes out with the following

By linux derivative I meant that it borrows the linux GCC ABI... and it does. You can compile with an off the shelf GCC cross compiler and link the resultant object files ones compiled with the PS3 provided version. We have done it. Also, as both an XBox 360 and PS3 developer, there seems to me to be nothing in the TCRs/TRCs that preclude us from using a different compiler. There are rules

Implementing the backend (or editing the current PPC backend as needed) is a definite option. This seems to be the real question... which is easier... maintaining the PPC backend or maintaining the rewriter. Currently (in admittedly trivial tests) I have gotten the rewriter to work and output C code. There are some outstanding issues to do with linking and accessing the reflection information

Hi All, Does anyone here on the list have CentOS 5.1 running on a PS3? I would like to look at integrating a couple of PS3 nodes into our cluster for it's ability to use the Cell processor inside and was wondering if anyone had any experiences.

Peter, Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself that is failing to initially interpret the string? If it is the code in TargetLowering, then I don't see any support

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in > > clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang > > relying on

Duncan, et al., I am interested in getting dragonegg to work on PowerPC. Obviously the stuff in src/x86 needs to be replaced/replicated for PowerPC, but if you have a few minutes, can you provide your thoughts on what has to be changed between x86 and PPC. Thanks in advance, Hal -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

I have been planing on installing a Linux OS on my ps3 for some time and I came across a site that said that wine would allow me to play PC games on it. If this is true what OS would be best and other stuff like that.