similar to: [LLVMdev] Clarification suggestion for the documention of LLVM

Hi, i do some tests with restoring HVM winxp-domU''s. Even, if i restore a saved DomU from a ramdisk, the Restoring-process has only a bandwidth about 23MB/sec: Here a example restoring an 512MB HVM opensuse10.3 DomU ...... [2008-05-07 22:40:12 3314] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:218) restore:shadow=0x5, _static_max=0x20000000, _static_min=0x0, [2008-05-07 22:40:12 3314] DEBUG (balloon:132)

Hi, All, I follow the menu http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html , but still failed to build LLVM debug version. Here's error message: 7>C:\study\llvm\projects\compiler-rt\lib\asan\asan_win.cc(69): fatal error C1189: #error : Please build the runtime with a non-debug CRT: /MD or /MT Any idear? -- Best Regards, Amy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html (Getting Started with the LLVM

I verified the patch and it compiles all the targets, both in Debug and Release modes. If there is no someone else to keep the MSVC projects files updated, I will try from time to time to update them and to add the new targets. Maybe a note must be put in "docs/GettingStartedVS.html" at the Requirements section that llvm needs now MSVC (Express) 2008 to compile. Razvan -----

Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >

Hi! question about: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html#tutorial "Note: while you cannot do this step on Windows, you can do it on a Unix system and transfer hello.bc to Windows. Important: transfer as a binary file!" Is this feature also planed for Windows? Regards, -mr

Hi all I cant find a clear answer to this anywhere in the release notes or the mailing list. Sorry, if it is mentioned somewhere and I have missed it. Can someone clarify as to if for LLVM 2.6, cmake is optional. http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html The page says - "This step is currently optional as LLVM does still come with a normal Visual Studio solution file, but it is not

2008/12/30 srs <skaflotten at gmail.com> > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > > srs <skaflotten at gmail.com> writes: > > > > > >>>> While testing my compiler on win32 in JIT mode, I ran into a couple of > >>>> issues: > >>>> > >>>> 1. I linked the compiler with the lib files resulting from the cmake >

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:07:19PM -0800, xavier wrote: > I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to > what extent. This link: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/ > > Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Is broken LLVM 1.5 hasn't been released yet. :) This is the current work-in-progress that will be

I am following along in http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html with a Hello World bitcode file. I can run the file using the command `lli HelloWorld.bc`, but now I want to link it into an executable file (on windows). The next thing the document says to run is `llc -filetype=obj HelloWorld.bc` which runs fine and now I have a `HelloWorld.obj` file. It's the last step that is giving me some

Hello, I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with Visual Studio 2008. The incriminated file is: llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp Where several calls to "std::lower_bound" are made, like: atom_iterator I = std::lower_bound(atom_begin(), atom_end(),

Mikael, Thanks for working on. My gross comments... - Canonical URL of LLVM project is; http://llvm.org/ , not www.llvm.org. - "test-suite and cygwin" could be split out. It would be special thing. - Memory/storage requirements would be moved to "A.B Debugging". Less memory would be enough without debug build. - Python (x64 binary) is available, too. I am using. Python

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Benoit Perrot <benoit.noe.perrot at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > Hi Benoit, > I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite > a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with > Visual Studio 2008. > > The incriminated file is: > > llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp > > Where several

As for Ninja, I'd like to wait until it is officially part of the released CMake. As I understand it, Windows support has been checked into the CMake repository but no offical release supporting Ninja has been made yet. I just retrieved Ninja from Github and this time it built without problems. 2012/6/16 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> > Mikael, > > Thanks for

Now I can't make CMake use "MSYS Makefiles". I get an error about GNU v4.7.0 being broken as it can't build a simple test program. Using "MinGW Makefiles", everything works out of the box. And I am trying to give the user the most Windowsy experience (to avoid Cygwin, GnuWin32, and MSYS, if I can). So I think I'll stick to my current angle - which is to let the

Hi Takumi, THANK YOU for your excellent review! It makes all the work worthwhile in itself. It is getting "late" here (it is early morning) so I am about to call it a day. But I will contemplate and incorporate your suggestions tomorrow, and send you a full reply. I think I originally wrote a document where I addressed both Visual Studio and MinGW, but then decided that there were

Oh, didn't realize that there already is a semi-official build of CMake with Ninja support. I am trying it out right now and it seems very promising. So I'll change the document to use Ninja instead of "MinGW Makefiles". No need to waste energy on MinGW and MSYS Makefiles when Ninja outdoes them both. I thought people would have to build CMake themselves, something I'd

Hi, There are 3 lld tests[1] that run the command `chmod 400` or `chmod u-w` and then check that lld generates a permission denied error when trying to write to the files. These tests fail when run as root, because `chmod 400` is not enough to prevent root from writing to files. Is there some other way we can tests this, or should we just not support running tests as root? A related question I

I need to build LLVM on Win XP VM. Are there any detailed instructions for that? Thank you -Shad Ahmad | Release Manager, Adobe AIR | Adobe Systems, Inc | sahmad at adobe.com | 408.536.4101

Hi, I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to what extent. This link: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/ Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Is broken Where can I find more information? In particular: Can the LLVM be compiled using VC++ 2003? Does it generate bytecode and executable code? Thanks