llvm dev - Mar 2005 - [LLVMdev] VC++ 2003

Hi,

I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to what extent.
This link:

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/

Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

Is broken

Where can I find more information? In particular:

Can the LLVM be compiled using VC++ 2003?

Does it generate bytecode and executable code?

Thanks


	
		
__________________________________ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:07:19PM -0800, xavier wrote:
> I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to
> what extent. This link:
> 
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/
> 
> Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
> 
> Is broken
LLVM 1.5 hasn't been released yet. :)
This is the current work-in-progress that will be finished soon.  If you
want the most current version of LLVM, please use CVS:

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout
 
> Where can I find more information? In particular:
> Can the LLVM be compiled using VC++ 2003?
> Does it generate bytecode and executable code?
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStartedVS.html

-- 
Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu

I am currently playing around with llvm using Visual C++ Express
(beta). It works flawlessly. It takes a while to get started but once
you do, everything is perfect. Make sure to get the latest CVS
sources, the 1.4 release doesn't play nice with Visual Studio. Once
you do, extract the file I attach to this email into the llvm\win32
folder. Then add llvm/win32\tools folder to a list of executable
search paths in VC options->directories. The instructions aren't
complete on this and it took me a couple of hours to figure out how to
get this working. Once you do this, you can just double click on the
sln file and build.


On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:11:32 -0600, Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:07:19PM -0800, xavier wrote:
> > I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to
> > what extent. This link:
> >
> > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/
> >
> > Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
> >
> > Is broken
> 
> LLVM 1.5 hasn't been released yet. :)
> This is the current work-in-progress that will be finished soon.  If you
> want the most current version of LLVM, please use CVS:
> 
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout
> 
> > Where can I find more information? In particular:
> > Can the LLVM be compiled using VC++ 2003?
> > Does it generate bytecode and executable code?
> 
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStartedVS.html
> 
> --
> Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tools.zip
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 1174967 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050309/0792500f/attachment.bin>