similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.9: Umbrella PR

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi David, > > Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-) > > -bw Bill, Any chance we can squeeze http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9571#c13 into llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9 for the final llvm-gcc release? Jack > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote: > > > Hi

Hi David, Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-) -bw On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Is the fix for Bug 9561 included? (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561) > > Cheers, > David. > > On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The good news:

Hi Bill, Is the fix for Bug 9561 included? (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561) Cheers, David. On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The good news: RC2 testing was successful in that it uncovered a bad regression from 2.8 (which existed in top-of-tree). It also showed that there was an unincorporated fix that needed to go into

This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT What this means for you: Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly. Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 15:07, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were > addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. > > This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and > complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find > them here: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ > > Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's > content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) > > Share and

On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Dongsheng Song wrote: > Tested with gcc 4.5.3 (20100324) on i686-w64-windows: > > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/gcc-4.5.3-windows_20110324.tar.xz > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.tar.xz > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.zip > > [[[ > ******************** > Testing: 0 .. 10..

Full_Name: Maxime To Version: 2.9 OS: WIndows Submission from: (NULL) (81.57.236.122) I am using the npindex and npindexbw fubctions of the NP package. I would like to compute the predicted values of the model and tried to use the predict function for this purpose but the function only gives me the summary of the model but no vector of predicted values as with any other model. Simply using the

On Aug 13, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Carter Cheng wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking over the documentation support for exceptions and it indicates that the invoke unwind support is incomplete. Is this still the case in 2.9? > Hi Carter, The use of the term "unwind" is a bit confusing in this context. The "invoke" instruction has an "unwind" clause, which is

There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find them here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) Share and enjoy! -bw

Hi all, The good news: RC2 testing was successful in that it uncovered a bad regression from 2.8 (which existed in top-of-tree). It also showed that there was an unincorporated fix that needed to go into the clang branch. The bad news: I'm truncating the RC2 testing phase and announcing the RC3 testing phase. Hopefully, because we caught the bugs in time this phase won't impact the

Hi Bill, Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? Thanks, Chad On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! > 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 > GMT > What this means for you: > Please keep a watch on all of your

Hi LLVM-cateers, The first phase of testing is nearing completion. (Actually, it's pretty much done.) You can find binaries here as well as the source code if you want to compile your own binaries: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/ We also have several bugs which have been reported. The umbrella bug report is here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15999 Now we need your help!

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find >> them here: >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ >> >> Please download them, build them, and

I'll make them available tonight. Sorry for the delay. -bw On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > Binaries (at least darwin), anyone? > > Thanks, > > Ákos > > > On 11/1/11 6:38 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> We are now in Phase 2 of testing for the LLVM 3.0 release! Please

Hi all, Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang and llvm-gcc.

On Mar 8, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 03/08/11 04:01, Bill Wendling wrote: >> It's that time again! (Well, it was that time yesterday, but I made a mistake.) The LLVM 2.9 release is now underway! > >> Developers: >> >> Top-of-tree is now open for submissions. The 2.9 release branch and tags are available for you to check out and test.

Not yet. That is, I don't think any have been filed at all for 3.0. I don't know whether to be happy or worried. :-) Any that are regressions should be marked with the 'regression' keyword and be a release blocker. -bw On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?

Binaries (at least darwin), anyone? Thanks, Ákos On 11/1/11 6:38 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >Hello! > >We are now in Phase 2 of testing for the LLVM 3.0 release! Please >consider getting a copy of the sources and testing them out on your >projects. The sources can be found here: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc2 > >What

> On Jul 31, 2016, at 12:36 AM, Justin Lebar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> This suggests what we really want in this case are several updates (one to each repository) on a branch that is then merged in one instant into the umbrella repository. Then the only thing the bots would see would be the merge commit and thus state is synchronized. > > The