On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0700, Bill Wendling
wrote:> Hi David,
>
> Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-)
>
> -bw
Bill,
Any chance we can squeeze http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9571#c13
into llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9 for the final llvm-gcc release?
Jack
>
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote:
>
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > Is the fix for Bug 9561 included?
(http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David.
> >
> > On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> The good news: RC2 testing was successful in that it uncovered a
bad regression from 2.8 (which existed in top-of-tree). It also showed that
there was an unincorporated fix that needed to go into the clang branch.
> >>
> >> The bad news: I'm truncating the RC2 testing phase and
announcing the RC3 testing phase. Hopefully, because we caught the bugs in time
this phase won't impact the release date.
> >>
> >> Please check out sources. Compile things. Report bugs. Etc.
> >>
> >> Sources:
> >>
> >> llvm-2.9rc3.src.tar.gz
> >> llvm-test-2.9rc3.src.tar.gz
> >> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc3.src.tar.gz
> >> clang-2.9rc3.src.tar.gz
> >>
> >> Available here:
> >>
> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/
> >>
> >> Share and enjoy!
> >> -bw
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev