similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM unit and regression tests, enabled targets and conditions

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM unit and regression tests, enabled targets and conditions"

2020 Apr 15
2
Seeking clarification and way forward on limited scope variables.
Hello Everyone, I need to have your thoughts on this. Consider the following test case -- ------------------------------------------- 1 int main(int Argc, char **Argv) { 2 int Local = 6; 3 printf("%d\n",Local); 4 5 { 6 printf("%d\n",Local); 7 int Local = 7; 8 printf("%d\n",Local); 9 }
2004 Aug 20
1
[LLVMdev] Optimized Nightly Test Regressions
Does anyone know about this error? llc: error auto-selecting target for module 'Cannot choose between targets "sparcv9" and "ppc64"'. Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. We have five new regressions resulting in that message: Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-phifcmpd : FAIL , expected PASS Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb : FAIL , expected
2020 Apr 15
4
Seeking clarification and way forward on limited scope variables.
Hi Sourabh, Thanks for raising this issue. To answer your question, (afaik) there isn’t anyone working on DW_AT_start_scope support in tree. We’re looking for a solution to this problem for Swift debugging, where it's important not to make a debug location for a variable available until its (guaranteed) initialization is complete. If at all possible, I’d /much/ rather we use the existing
2014 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] JIT on armhf, again
On 7/23/14, 3:30 PM, Tim Northover wrote: [...] > It looks like it's a case of calling Module::setTargetTriple. As with > most JIT setup questions, though, often the best way to find out is to > get something working in lli and then look at what it does > (tools/lli/lli.cpp). Well, it's *almost* working --- hardfloat code is now being generated, and it even seems to be right
2006 Jul 19
3
error when compiling "stats" library in R-2.3.1 on Solaris x86
Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c
2005 Feb 01
4
Shorewall problem
I am getting the following message when Shorewall stops can anybody shed any light on this message and where I should be looking? Thanks root@bobshost:~# shorewall stop Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Stopping Shorewall...Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ... IP Forwarding Enabled
2004 Feb 10
22
Re: [Shorewall-newbies] specific log-prefix ... patch
Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list.... On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote: > here is a patch to allow this : > |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp > > a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory. > i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw. Also, with
2005 Oct 11
1
Compile problem R 2.2.0 + Solaris 10 x86
Hi! I'm trying to compile R (32-bit) on Solaris 10 x86 using Sun Studio 10 + Sun Perflib (for BLAS and LAPACK) but encountered issues with undefined symbol "bratio". Appreciate any help. Compiler options (from configure output): ============================================== R is now configured for i386-pc-solaris2.10 Source directory: . Installation directory:
2009 Mar 11
1
Compiling R-2.8.1 on Sparc Solaris 10: libRlapack.so: symbol __vlog_: referenced symbol not found
Hi, I am compiling R2.8.1 on a Sun M4000 machine with Solaris 10. I am using Sun Studio 12. I get the following error: cc -xtarget=native64 -G -L/usr/sfw/lib/sparcv9 -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9 -o grDevices.so chull.o devNull.o devPicTeX.o devPS.o devQuartz.o init.o mkdir ../../../../library/grDevices/libs Warning in solve.default(rgb) : unable to load shared library
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this mail list? Now results. Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended. New regressions: Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL , expected PASS Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL
2015 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
Hi, Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets than `lli`? I have a hello.ll on which this works: $ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll # OK, generates hello.s But this doesn't: $ lli -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll # lli: error creating EE: No available targets are compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets. I'm
2008 Nov 18
1
Getting error ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:
I have 2 .cpp files in two different directories in which I need to put DTrace probes. They are compiled into two .a libraries one after another. In the end they are combined to a single .so file. This sequence I can not change. I get an error "ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:". What is the solution for this? Here is my simulation of real world problem in
2006 Feb 20
2
Unable to configure R 2.2.1 on Solaris 5.10 x86_64
Hello, Apologies for the post here. I have read the R-Admin (learned a lot!) and searched the web for days, but still fail at compiling R on my Ultra 20 running solaris 10 x86 1/06. This is the tail of './configure' output: ..... checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking readline/history.h usability... no checking readline/history.h presence... no checking for readline/history.h... no
2012 Feb 11
0
[LLVMdev] DW_TAG_base_type missing DW_AT_name for subrange types
Hi, ctfconvert is particularly unhappy about that (e.g., ERROR: ctfconvert: die 141: base type without name). Is it intended behavior? Simple testcase: int main(void) { int i[2]; return 0; } dwarfdump output: clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final): [...] LOCAL_SYMBOLS: [...] <3>< 120> DW_TAG_variable DW_AT_name i
2012 Feb 11
2
[LLVMdev] DW_TAG_base_type missing DW_AT_name for subrange types
Hi, ctfconvert is particularly unhappy about that (e.g., ERROR: ctfconvert: die 141: base type without name). Is it intended behavior? Simple testcase: int main(void) { int i[2]; return 0; } dwarfdump output: clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final): [...] LOCAL_SYMBOLS: [...] <3>< 120> DW_TAG_variable DW_AT_name i
2009 Mar 12
3
Error compiling rgl package
Hi, I receive the following error while I try to install rgl package: CC -xtarget=native64 -I/opt/R-2.8.1/lib/R/include -I/opt/SUNWhpc/HPC8.1/sun/include -DHAVE_PNG_H -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DHAVE_FREETYPE -Iext/ftgl -I/usr/sfw/include/freetype2 -I/usr/sfw/include -Iext -I/opt/SUNWhpc/HPC8.1/sun/include -I/usr/sfw/include -I/opt/csw/include -KPIC -O -c Background.cpp -o Background.o
2006 Feb 03
2
rgl install problem on Solaris 10 X86
Hi, Could you help me to install the rgl package on Solaris 10 x86? I tried and got the following error messages. When I compiled my R as 64bit, I used the SUN ProW compilers. However, gcc seems to being used below as well as missing some information. Thank you in advance, Dongseok > install.packages("rgl") --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- *
2015 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
Hi, Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets than `lli`? I have a hello.ll on which this works: $ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll # OK, generates hello.s But this doesn't: $ lli -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll # lli: error creating EE: No available targets are compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets. I'm
2018 Apr 05
1
print signature of function from dwarf info in file?
Hi I'm using llvm-5. Browsing the source of llvm-dwarfdump and trying it on some shared libraries, I see I can print the debug info (assuming it exists). For some function, I'm wondering if there's a short cut to prettyprinting the signature of a function in the library? I think, looking at the output, that enough information exists but it seems to involve looking at the subprogram
2015 Jul 23
0
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:31 AM Débora Setton Sanches < setton.debora at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets > than `lli`? > I have a hello.ll on which this works: > > $ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll > # OK, generates hello.s > > But this doesn't: > > $ lli