Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM unit and regression tests, enabled targets and conditions"
2020 Apr 15
2
Seeking clarification and way forward on limited scope variables.
Hello Everyone,
I need to have your thoughts on this.
Consider the following test case --
-------------------------------------------
1 int main(int Argc, char **Argv) {
2 int Local = 6;
3 printf("%d\n",Local);
4
5 {
6 printf("%d\n",Local);
7 int Local = 7;
8 printf("%d\n",Local);
9 }
2004 Aug 20
1
[LLVMdev] Optimized Nightly Test Regressions
Does anyone know about this error?
llc: error auto-selecting target for module 'Cannot choose between
targets "sparcv9" and "ppc64"'. Please use the -march option to
explicitly pick a target.
We have five new regressions resulting in that message:
Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-phifcmpd : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb : FAIL , expected
2020 Apr 15
4
Seeking clarification and way forward on limited scope variables.
Hi Sourabh,
Thanks for raising this issue. To answer your question, (afaik) there isn’t anyone working on DW_AT_start_scope support in tree. We’re looking for a solution to this problem for Swift debugging, where it's important not to make a debug location for a variable available until its (guaranteed) initialization is complete.
If at all possible, I’d /much/ rather we use the existing
2014 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] JIT on armhf, again
On 7/23/14, 3:30 PM, Tim Northover wrote:
[...]
> It looks like it's a case of calling Module::setTargetTriple. As with
> most JIT setup questions, though, often the best way to find out is to
> get something working in lli and then look at what it does
> (tools/lli/lli.cpp).
Well, it's *almost* working --- hardfloat code is now being generated,
and it even seems to be right
2006 Jul 19
3
error when compiling "stats" library in R-2.3.1 on Solaris x86
Hello,
I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers.
I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it.
Could you tell me how to fix this problem?
f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o
f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c
2005 Feb 01
4
Shorewall problem
I am getting the following message when Shorewall stops can anybody shed
any light on this message and where I should be looking? Thanks
root@bobshost:~# shorewall stop
Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions...
Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf...
Loading Modules...
Stopping Shorewall...Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ...
IP Forwarding Enabled
2004 Feb 10
22
Re: [Shorewall-newbies] specific log-prefix ... patch
Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list....
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote:
> here is a patch to allow this :
> |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp
>
> a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory.
> i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw.
Also, with
2005 Oct 11
1
Compile problem R 2.2.0 + Solaris 10 x86
Hi!
I'm trying to compile R (32-bit) on Solaris 10 x86
using Sun Studio 10 + Sun Perflib (for BLAS and
LAPACK) but encountered issues with undefined symbol
"bratio". Appreciate any help.
Compiler options (from configure output):
==============================================
R is now configured for i386-pc-solaris2.10
Source directory: .
Installation directory:
2009 Mar 11
1
Compiling R-2.8.1 on Sparc Solaris 10: libRlapack.so: symbol __vlog_: referenced symbol not found
Hi,
I am compiling R2.8.1 on a Sun M4000 machine with Solaris 10.
I am using Sun Studio 12.
I get the following error:
cc -xtarget=native64 -G -L/usr/sfw/lib/sparcv9 -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9 -o
grDevices.so chull.o devNull.o devPicTeX.o devPS.o devQuartz.o init.o
mkdir ../../../../library/grDevices/libs
Warning in solve.default(rgb) :
unable to load shared library
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
mail list?
Now results.
Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
New regressions:
Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL ,
expected PASS
Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL
2015 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
Hi,
Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets
than `lli`?
I have a hello.ll on which this works:
$ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll
# OK, generates hello.s
But this doesn't:
$ lli -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll
# lli: error creating EE: No available targets are compatible with
this triple, see -version for the available targets.
I'm
2008 Nov 18
1
Getting error ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:
I have 2 .cpp files in two different directories in which I need to put DTrace probes. They are compiled into two .a libraries one after another. In the end they are combined to a single .so file. This sequence I can not change. I get an error "ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:". What is the solution for this?
Here is my simulation of real world problem in
2006 Feb 20
2
Unable to configure R 2.2.1 on Solaris 5.10 x86_64
Hello,
Apologies for the post here. I have read the R-Admin (learned
a lot!) and searched the web for days, but still fail at compiling R on
my Ultra 20 running solaris 10 x86 1/06.
This is the tail of './configure' output:
.....
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking readline/history.h usability... no
checking readline/history.h presence... no
checking for readline/history.h... no
2012 Feb 11
0
[LLVMdev] DW_TAG_base_type missing DW_AT_name for subrange types
Hi,
ctfconvert is particularly unhappy about that (e.g., ERROR: ctfconvert:
die 141: base type without name). Is it intended behavior?
Simple testcase:
int
main(void)
{
int i[2];
return 0;
}
dwarfdump output:
clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final):
[...]
LOCAL_SYMBOLS:
[...]
<3>< 120> DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name i
2012 Feb 11
2
[LLVMdev] DW_TAG_base_type missing DW_AT_name for subrange types
Hi,
ctfconvert is particularly unhappy about that (e.g., ERROR: ctfconvert:
die 141: base type without name). Is it intended behavior?
Simple testcase:
int
main(void)
{
int i[2];
return 0;
}
dwarfdump output:
clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final):
[...]
LOCAL_SYMBOLS:
[...]
<3>< 120> DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name i
2009 Mar 12
3
Error compiling rgl package
Hi,
I receive the following error while I try to install rgl package:
CC -xtarget=native64 -I/opt/R-2.8.1/lib/R/include
-I/opt/SUNWhpc/HPC8.1/sun/include -DHAVE_PNG_H -I/usr/include/libpng12
-DHAVE_FREETYPE -Iext/ftgl -I/usr/sfw/include/freetype2
-I/usr/sfw/include -Iext -I/opt/SUNWhpc/HPC8.1/sun/include
-I/usr/sfw/include -I/opt/csw/include -KPIC -O -c Background.cpp -o
Background.o
2006 Feb 03
2
rgl install problem on Solaris 10 X86
Hi,
Could you help me to install the rgl package on Solaris 10 x86?
I tried and got the following error messages.
When I compiled my R as 64bit, I used the SUN ProW compilers.
However, gcc seems to being used below as well as missing some information.
Thank you in advance,
Dongseok
> install.packages("rgl")
--- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session ---
*
2015 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
Hi,
Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets
than `lli`?
I have a hello.ll on which this works:
$ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll
# OK, generates hello.s
But this doesn't:
$ lli -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll
# lli: error creating EE: No available targets are compatible with
this triple, see -version for the available targets.
I'm
2018 Apr 05
1
print signature of function from dwarf info in file?
Hi
I'm using llvm-5. Browsing the source of llvm-dwarfdump and trying it on
some shared libraries, I see I can print the debug info (assuming it
exists). For some function, I'm wondering if there's a short cut to
prettyprinting the signature of a function in the library? I think, looking
at the output, that enough information exists but it seems to involve
looking at the subprogram
2015 Jul 23
0
[LLVMdev] lli supports different targets than llc?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:31 AM Débora Setton Sanches <
setton.debora at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it normal/expected for `llc` to support a different set of targets
> than `lli`?
> I have a hello.ll on which this works:
>
> $ llc -mtriple=armv7a-linux-gnueabihf hello.ll
> # OK, generates hello.s
>
> But this doesn't:
>
> $ lli