Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Dead ELFRelocation.h file in include\llvm\CodeGen"
2010 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Dead ELFRelocation.h file in include\llvm\CodeGen
Class ELFRelocation is already moved to llvm/lib/CodeGen/ELF.h
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
2013 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
For example,
ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h
should moved into Object directory with new name.
and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo directory.
2013/6/29 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>:
> Where would you like to move them?
>
> -eric
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
> <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> From my point of view, the
2013 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
Going to be interesting layering issues if you do the latter. Then you
have CodeGen depending upon DebugInfo instead of just a header in
Support.
-eric
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:08 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
<luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
> For example,
> ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h
> should moved into Object directory with new name.
> and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo
2013 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
>From my point of view, the Support library should be more pure. And
should not contains
too much LLVM-related APIs and defines,
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
2016 Jun 29
3
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer
> gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release
> binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for
>
2016 Jun 29
0
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
It is possible to statically link against libstdc++, yes. I don't quite
know all the pieces to the recipe in order to get that to work. It would
require changes to the release script in order to get those configuration
changes all the way through the third phase build.
I don't believe any other tarball release does this, so it would at least
be an unconventional release.
On Wed, Jun
2009 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC can't Inlcude *.inc files properly
I means visual studio c++ 2008, do you build clang+llvm with .sln
files, and these files are generated by cmake? I do of that. And
because vs c++ can't recognize path such a:/filepath/.. Properlyn it's
recognized as a:/filepath
So we need change /.. to /../ or /../.
2009/8/6, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>:
> I don't understand this problem, I have built clang on
2013 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
Where would you like to move them?
-eric
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
<luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
> From my point of view, the Support library should be more pure. And
> should not contains
> too much LLVM-related APIs and defines,
> --
> 此致
> 礼
> 罗勇刚
> Yours
> sincerely,
> Yonggang Luo
>
>
2013 Oct 19
2
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds
2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>:
> On 19 October 2013 06:01, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found that access llvm-mc from clang driver is impossible, and I
>> want to use llvm-mc to compile assembly files, how to do that?
>
> Try "clang -integrated-as -c test.s"
Thank you very much, I use the
2016 Jun 28
3
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all?
Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it
> against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer
> libstdc++.
>
> Sorry, it would be clearer
2016 Jun 28
2
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
Hell, Brian, I found a way to install Gcc 5.3 on CentOS 6 without the need
to building it from source. You may try it on CentOS 6.0
That's makes clang/llvm won't depends on the newer version of glibc 2.14
The instruction:
vim /etc/yum.repos.d/llvm.repo
The content:
```
[sclo]
name=SCLO
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/x86_64/rh/
gpgcheck=0
enabled=1
```
Installation step:
2013 Jun 21
1
[LLVMdev] Patch for the fact that all llvm python scripts are python 2.x compatible.
720beaedce6f19c81156fe20168f85989a8db53d
CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index bb70f15..e327427 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ set(LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE
"${LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE}" CACHE STRING
set(TARGET_TRIPLE "${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}")
2016 Nov 15
2
Dwarf.h & Dwarf.def & Dwarf.cpp doesn't belong to Supoort, belogns to DebugInfo.
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161115/80fd3c17/attachment.html>
2010 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Why llvm function name is different with . and ..
declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8 <delta> )
declare i16 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i16.p0i16( i16* <ptr>, i16 <delta> )
declare i32 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i32.p0i32( i32* <ptr>, i32 <delta> )
declare i64 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i64.p0i64( i64* <ptr>, i64 <delta> )
declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.min.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8
2016 Jun 28
2
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
[root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin
[root at localhost bin]# ./clang
./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./clang)
./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found
(required by ./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6:
2016 Jun 28
0
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer
gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release
binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for "centos6"
when it would really be bound to "centos6 plus the SCLO mirror which has
the dependency for a newer libstdc++".
The glibc 2.14 dependency is a
2009 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] I add utf8 meta for all html documents:)
The patch is for version 77784
And it's fixed the cmake for eclipse win32 mingw makefile output:)
Also a warning in VS 2008 on stub.c
Hope someone apply this patch.
And those files that place the
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Before <title> is just because of
in tag title may contains strange characters such as Chinese
2013 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds
I can confirm I get the same behavior, and that's a real bug. If you use
--target=i686-pc-win32, you get COFF, and that should be a good workaround
for now. There must be a conditional somewhere that isn't handling mingw
correctly.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:58 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com>wrote:
> 2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at
2013 Oct 19
2
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds
I found that access llvm-mc from clang driver is impossible, and I
want to use llvm-mc to compile assembly files, how to do that?
H:\CI\bld\compilers\musl\src\math\i386>clang -c -v --target=i686-pc-mingw sqrt.s
clang version 3.4 (trunk)
Target: i686-pc-mingw
Thread model: posix
Selected GCC installation:
"gcc" -v -c -m32 -o sqrt.o -x assembler sqrt.s
clang.exe: error: unable to
2020 Sep 23
3
How about add webassembly/wasi support in llvm-libc.
Cause llvm-libc are in early stage, and we can easily catch up the support
with linux.
After we add wasi support in llvm-lic, we can easily get a usable llvm-libc
across different platform such as linux/windows/macos/android. don't know
if iOS is a target, but these target are very much enough
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
-------------- next part --------------
An