similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add missing file (SCCVN.cpp) to the cmake build system

Hello Visual Studio is complaining about the mix of struct and class. 2>C:\dev\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/ValueMap.h(202) : warning C4099: 'llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::ValueMapCallbackVH<KeyT,ValueT,Config,ValueInfoT>>' : type name first seen using 'struct' now seen using 'class' 2> C:\dev\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/ValueMap.h(251) : see reference to class

What is the state of SCCVN pass? It looks like no work is done on it after the initial release. Are there any plans to merge GVN functionality and/or replace GVN pass in the future? Gregory

Hello While building LLVM, the compiler (static analysis) is giving me a warning about "if (RangeUse[0] == 0 && RangeUse[0] == 0) {". Can somebody familar with the codebase look over it, maybe this should be "if (RangeUse[0] == 0 && RangeUse[1] == 0) {", otherwise sorry for the noise. Index: F:/dev/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp

Hi everybody, I just updated to the latest svn trunk version, but now the code does not compile anymore. It trows an error in "f:\dev\llvm\lib\system\Win32/DynamicLibrary.inc(159) : error C2228: left of '.find' must have class/struct/union". Below you can find the small patch which makes the compiler happy again :-) Sincerely yours Marius Wachtler

On Jan 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Marius Wachtler wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just updated to the latest svn trunk version, but now the code > does not compile anymore. > It trows an error in "f:\dev\llvm\lib\system\Win32/ > DynamicLibrary.inc(159) : error C2228: left of '.find' must have > class/struct/union". Oops, sorry about that, fixed, please

Hello I think I found a bug in the x86 instruction definition file, while trying out the disassembler. It looks like the "ADD32rr_alt" instruction should have GR32 operands, not GR16. Attached you can find a patch, which should fix the problem. But even with the change I can not decode e.g. "0x03 0xC1" (should be "addl %ecx, %eax") only if I remove the

Hello The current svn revision fails to compile on windows using Visual Studio 2008. I'm getting: 3>f:\dev\llvm\lib\codegen\asmprinter\dwarfwriter.cpp(1167) : error C4716: 'llvm::DbgScope::getLine' : must return a value 3>f:\dev\llvm\lib\codegen\asmprinter\dwarfwriter.cpp(1168) : error C4716: 'llvm::DbgScope::getColumn' : must return a value

Hello If I optimize (opt -std-compile-opts ) the following .ll ; ModuleID = 'call0.ll' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i386-mingw32" define i32 @t(i32 %a) nounwind { entry: %0 = tail call i32 inttoptr (i32 0 to i32 (i32)*)(i32 %a) nounwind

> Dale Johannesen wrote: >> Marius Wachtler wrote: >> ... >> The call to address 0 gets removed. >> >> define i32 @t(i32 %a) noreturn nounwind readnone { >> entry: >> unreachable >> } >> >> How can I prevent that the call is removed, without making the >> function addr volatile? >> Does anyone know which optimization

Morten, I've applied these patches. Thanks for the updates! Reid. On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 01:26, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hi, > > when I updated the sources today there were several small problems that > stopped the windows version from compiling, here are the patches > > m. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Index:

Simplifycfg doesn't get run by default even with -O3, but 'opt -simplifycfg' can do it. I'm looking to add this functionality to an optimizer program that uses the llvm libraries. What's the best way to do this? I don't really mind whether it becomes available as a command line option as in opt, or I need to hardcode it as always on. To make it available as a command line

Okay, as far as I can see looking through the output of that, the empty block isn't created near the end, it exists at the start and never goes away. On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Can you run your IR though opt with -O3 and -print-after-all and see when > the block becomes empty?

Yes, that is what I was thinking. Should I report it as a bug? On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Russell Wallace" <russell.wallace at gmail.com> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >

Hi Bram, Could you submit bug reports for all of these problems? Thanks! -bw On 5/29/07, Bram Adams <bram.adams at ugent.be> wrote: > Hi, > > Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not > work yet. > > > 1) On OSX, I get: > > Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function > 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! > > when I

Hi, Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not work yet. 1) On OSX, I get: Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c 2) On Linux X86, llc does not give any problem, but I get this while compiling the generated .c file: error: unknown register name 'S' in

Hi Dmitri, For what version of VS did you update the project files? Ted On May 17, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Dmitri Makarov wrote: > attached is the diff of vcprojs that need to be changed to fix the VS > build as of revision: 51224. > > I don't know if this catches all the missing bits, but this does build > all the way through. > > > Index: win32/Analysis/Analysis.vcproj

Some code in GVN.cpp: static Value *CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType(Value *StoredVal, Type *LoadedTy, Instruction *InsertPt, const DataLayout &DL) { .... // Convert vectors and fp to integer, which can be manipulated. if (!StoredValTy->isIntegerTy()) {

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander at nomadiclab.com> wrote: > I am working on heavily optimising unusually static C++ code, and have encountered a situation where I basically want an optimiser that would speculatively unroll a loop to see if the first round of the loop could be optimised further.  (I happen to know that it is possible.)  The previous

Hello all, I have a question related to noduplicate attribute. For example, if I have the following source code: __attribute__((noduplicate)) __attribute__((always_inline)) void wait () { // some code barrier(); // some code } __attribute__((noduplicate)) void barrier (); void f () { // some code wait(); // some code } Sometimes I observed a phenomenon that

> There should be no difference between using llvm-gcc at some -O > level, and running it at -O0 and using opt to run the passes on > the unoptimized bitcode. However, you wrote earlier: > Finally, llvm-gcc runs the following passes on each function > immediately after it is created: > > CFGSimplification, PromoteMemoryToRegister, > ScalarReplAggregates,