similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Tests with CLANG FE

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] LLVM Tests with CLANG FE"

2003 May 11
2
libpq-fe.h ???
Hi all, I tried to install the Rdbi_0.1-2.tar.gz and Rdbi.PgSQL_0.1-2 package. The Rdbi_0.1-2.tar.gz installed fine but the Rdbi.PgSQL_0.1-2 had some problems. The compilation routine tried to find a header called libpq-fe.h but did not find it in the standard locations. I searched through the computer but did not find a file called in this way either. What should I do to successuffly
2014 May 06
0
Failed "bundle install" due to libpq-fe.h
I tried to run the command "bundle install" as follow and then I got this error: # bundle install Don't run Bundler as root. Bundler can ask for sudo if it is needed, and installing your bundle as root will break this application for all non-root users on this machine. Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/........ Fetching additional metadata from
2008 Jul 14
4
FE driver and log dirty
Here''s a question about FE driver and log dirty, when live migration is concerned. Log dirty mode is used in live migration, which works for those polluted pages from CPU issued accesses, but not for DMA path (as BE driver talked here which access from another domain like dom0). Most frontend drivers don''t implement their own suspend interface (netfront implements when
2016 May 11
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
>-----Original Message----- >From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Reid >Kleckner via cfe-dev >Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:40 AM >To: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> >Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Clang Dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> >Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Up front type information
2016 Mar 31
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
Hi Aboud, > On Mar 31, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Aboud, Amjad via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > I can understand the need for improving the current design of debug info representation and emission in LLVM. > However, let’s not forget that the motivation was and still to support CodeView debug info emission. Well, that is *one* motivation. > I am
2009 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] linux build problem
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> wrote: >> I do have a concern that this might have regressed the Fortran FE. >> Could you (or someone who runs it) test this? > > I noticed my patch was applied and then reverted. I am curious, why > was it a problem for the Fortran FE? > Reverted, but with a better fix. :-) I wanted to keep
2010 Feb 13
0
Decoded files identical, encoded files different (linux vs win encoder)
Djeizon Barros wrote: > > Another possibility could be different line endings in some > > metadata file (ie '\r\n' on windows and '\n' on Linux). > > > > The produced files are tagless. So I don't know about this... but > it is a good guess Its a good guess and its wrong :-). > I have uploaded a small file example for you to check. > I am
2011 Dec 04
1
Complex multiple t tests in a data frame with several id factors
I have assayed the concentrations of various metal elements in different anatomic regions of two strains of mice. Now, for each element, in each region, I want to do a t test to find whether there is any difference between the two strains. Here is what I did (using simulated data as an example): # create the data frame > elemconc = data.frame(expand.grid(id=1:3, geno=c('exp',
2009 Jan 21
0
[LLVMdev] linux build problem
> I do have a concern that this might have regressed the Fortran FE. > Could you (or someone who runs it) test this? I noticed my patch was applied and then reverted. I am curious, why was it a problem for the Fortran FE? > -bw Cheers, -- Rafael Avila de Espindola Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland Registered in Dublin, Ireland | Registration Number: 368047
2013 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
Would it be possible to have a parameterised attribute? opt(min), opt(size), opt(max) ? On 14 January 2013 12:46, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>wrote: > If I understand the attributes correctly, they would be function-level > attributes applied to IR functions, correct? I'm curious what the > semantics would be for cross-function optimization. For
2016 Mar 31
1
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm
The split between CodeView and DWARF will happen at the level of type information. So, DIVariable, DISubprogram, DILocation, DILocalScope, etc will all be shared, but records and composite types etc will not. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Aboud, Amjad via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Mehdi, > > I understand the reasoning for supporting this proposal
2011 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-config and clang
My CMakeLists.txt depends heavily on llvm-config to provide command-line parameters for compiling my project. However, I'm curious to know whether the output of "llvm-config --cppflags" is intended for consumption by gcc or clang. I'm guessing the answer is "both", since clang provides support for gcc-compatible command args. However, I'm wondering whether it would
2010 Nov 13
1
Mac OS X configure requires (de|fe)bootstrap
Hello, I'd like to get libguestfs to compile on Mac OS X and I've been chugging along quite well. I recently hit an issue in the "./configure" which I don't thin is solvable on Mac without modifying libguestfs autotools scripts but I can easily be wrong: checking for febootstrap... no checking for debootstrap... no configure: error: Either febootstrap or debootstrap must be
2009 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] Tooling support for LLVM-GCC, or CLANG?
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Granville Barnett wrote: > I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the > works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. > I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I > *think* it was the gentleman that presented something on CLANG at > the dev's conference 2008) made a bit
2015 Feb 18
0
Different serialization of functions in interactive vs. batch mode
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Holger Hoefling wrote: > Hi Luke, > > Ah - I see - thank you! This at least points me to a way on how to > "fix" this. I tried setting the srcref attribute to NULL, but the hash > value is still different and so is the serialization. So this looks > like it is one difference, but not all of them when source attributes are attached they are
2015 Feb 18
0
Different serialization of functions in interactive vs. batch mode
Holger, For me (see session info) using digest(as.list(f)) gets around this problem. ~G > sessionInfo() R version 3.1.0 (2014-04-10) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C [9]
2013 Jul 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] llvm (hence Clang) not compiling with Visual Studio 2008
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Benoit Perrot <benoit.noe.perrot at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > Hi Benoit, > I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite > a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with > Visual Studio 2008. > > The incriminated file is: > > llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp > > Where several
2009 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] Tooling support for LLVM-GCC, or CLANG?
I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I *think* it was the gentleman that presented something on CLANG at the dev's conference 2008) made a bit of a point by saying that LLVM, unlike GCC has been built from the ground up with
2011 May 23
4
Question Fe and BE device
Hello, I try to install some applications on XEN. These applications have a automated install and are based on SLES10SP3. During the installation the device searches for /dev/sr0. Which fails in the xen enviroment. I now make a work around with booting a rescue system and mounting /dev/hdc and so on. But it should not be that difficult to install something into XEN. Can Somebody shed some
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
If I understand the attributes correctly, they would be function-level attributes applied to IR functions, correct? I'm curious what the semantics would be for cross-function optimization. For example, consider a function "foo" defined with maxopt and a function "bar" defined with optsize. If foo() calls bar() and the inliner wants to inline bar() into foo(), is that