similar to: [LLVMdev] Solaris port to be contributed by Sun Labs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Solaris port to be contributed by Sun Labs"

2008 May 15
1
[LLVMdev] Solaris port to be contributed by Sun Labs
We are using LLVM for our bug-checking project, Parfait, and we'll be contributing the Solaris port within the next month. Regards, Cristina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080515/9030c4aa/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com > <mailto:benny.kra at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: > > > Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> On 13.07.2012,
2012 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into >>> our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run
2008 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] use-diet for review
Hi Gabor, Thanks for posting the memory savings. 13% less memory usage in 447.dealII is very impressive. I haven't taken more than a very brief peek at this patch, but I have a few questions already. Is there a header missing? I don't see DECLARE_TRANSPARENT_OPERAND_ACCESSORS defined anywhere. Also, what affect does this macro have on doxygen? In User.h: +public: + template
2012 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote: > > On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> > wrote: > > > Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> >
2012 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
Benjamin Kramer wrote: > On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into >> our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run from >> a ClearCase view for automatic dependency tracking, we have been >> biten by a Linux bug, and
2007 Jun 07
3
Reductive Labs Asks: What platforms and software are you managing?
We'd like to get new users to the information they need quickly and one thing new users want to know is if they can use Puppet for what they want to do. So far, we don't have a very extensive (or thorough) list of platforms and software solutions that our community is using with Puppet. To deal with this, I've drafted a short list of platforms under which Puppet is
2012 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
On 13.07.2012, at 09:46, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am in charge of the controlled introduction of clang into > our builds at my workplace. Since all our tools must run from > a ClearCase view for automatic dependency tracking, we have been > biten by a Linux bug, and readlink("/proc/self/exe", ...) gives >
2010 Sep 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 75, Issue 32
2010/9/15 <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> > Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > > You can
2010 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Casting.h illness
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Gabor Greif wrote: > Am 22.07.2010 um 00:21 schrieb Chris Lattner: > >> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: >>> Is this a recommended approach/good style/good idea to use >>> dyn_cast_or_null<X>(I) instead of dyn_cast_or_null<X>(*I)? (And other >>> is and cast functions). >> >> We
2006 Mar 14
0
[LLVMdev] Port to Solaris' Sun Studio 8
Hi all. A company I'm working for is interested in using LLVM as a part of a larger suite of products, and I'm in charge of porting it to Sun Studio 8, one of the compilers that our product builds on. I've made reasonable progress, and for the most part the compiler's co-operating, however I'm running into a problem I believe is with template resolution, and I'm looking for
2010 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] Casting.h illness
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: > Is this a recommended approach/good style/good idea to use > dyn_cast_or_null<X>(I) instead of dyn_cast_or_null<X>(*I)? (And other > is and cast functions). We generally don't want auto-dereference. There is some special magic for unwrapping Uses etc though. Is this what you're in contact with Gabor? -Chris >
2006 Mar 15
0
[LLVMdev] RE: Port to Solaris' Sun Studio 8
Michael Smith wrote: > Well, line 364 wasn't actually what was holding me up, so it's a bad > example, but the problem's still relevant. Using cast<...>(iter), > dyn_cast<...>(iter), or isa<...>(iter) results in the error messages > mentioned below. .... > When compiling LoadValueNumbering.cpp, I get the following errors: > >
2010 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Casting.h illness
Am 22.07.2010 um 23:29 schrieb Chris Lattner: > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Gabor Greif wrote: > >> Am 22.07.2010 um 00:21 schrieb Chris Lattner: >> >>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: >>>> Is this a recommended approach/good style/good idea to use >>>> dyn_cast_or_null<X>(I) instead of
2014 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] 3-bit Waymarking
On 4/22/14, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:28 AM, Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> after my intentionally "playful" EuroLLVM presentation (*) I think it >> would be time to get serious about merging to ToT. But we should >> probably find out whether an optimized
2010 Jul 05
1
[LLVMdev] [HEADSUP] Another attempt at CallInst operand rotation
Reminder... Round one has been committed as <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=107432> I hope that it got digested by now, as I plan to commit the second round tomorrow. In fact I made two test commits already: r107480 and r107580, the former of which actually uncovered some more uses of the low-level interfaces in core LLVM that have slipped through. To be
2009 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
Quoting Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com>: Hi Gabor, I can not open the link, can you send again? > AAAH! > > I see you are still at 2.5. Then this patch (the fix) > is relevant for you: > > <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ADT/ > ilist.h?r1=66061&r2=68785&diff_format=h> > > Cheers, > > Gabor > > >
1999 Aug 04
1
Re: Contributed packages for R windows port
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Peter Ho wrote: > I have been browsing in the contributed packages webpage and found that > there is an R port for MClust. Is there a way I can use it using the > windows port of R 0.64.2? I could not find a windows port of MClust. Simple reason: I was not able to compile it successfully under Windows. I did make it compile after a lot of effort, but it crashed R on
2007 Apr 14
1
[LLVMdev] "Name that compiler"
Looks like people send many names in the contest, so shall I do too. I propose "Lepton", loosely meaning light (featherweight) in Greek. It is used in particle physics to refer to very light particles (electrons, muons). For me it also has the connotations of fastness and restlessness (in the LLVM sense of post-compile optimization). See more at:
2010 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] [Q] x86 peephole deficiency
Am 07.10.2010 um 19:50 schrieb Chris Lattner: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am slowly working on a SwitchInst optimizer (http://llvm.org/ >> PR8125) >> and now I am running into a deficiency of the x86 >> peephole optimizer (or jump-threader?). Here is what I get: >> >> >> andl $3,