Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Bugs in Getting Started Guide"
2007 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Bugs in Getting Started Guide
> (*) The �Getting Started Quickly� section describes commands using gunzip;
> the binaries are distributed using bzip2 instead.
>
> (*) The directory structure after step 4 doesn�t have a �llvm-3.4� or
> �platform� directory; no such command �fixheaders� can be found.
These two sections have been fixed. Thanks!
> (*) The docs aren�t clear as to which �source code� is needed
2007 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Bugs in Getting Started Guide
Hello, Ted.
> (*) For a MinGW/MSYS system, is the default /usr/local configure
> parameter still the correct one? My MSYS installation doesn’t seem to
> have one, so either I screwed that up, or else this isn’t good advice
> for a MSYS installation.
Yes, it is. It will be created if it doesn't exist. However, you can
surely select any prefix you want (even with paths of form
2009 Jul 11
4
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 61, Issue 25
Hi Anton,
The problem is in getting the system configured. Below is the crash I get in
configure. Your comment regarding gnuwin32 not being needed is interesting -
I actually installed gnu bison/flex to get past an earlier crash in
configure.
Thats why I was suggesting that a precompiled OBJ_ROOT for MingW32 would be
a good idea - configure appears to be inherently fragile, and requires more
2016 Mar 23
4
Building ModulePass independiently on win32
Hi,
I have written a ModulePass (c++ code) that does transformation to LLVM bytecode. How do I build,compile and run it on windows.
a) I need Win32 LLVM tools. (so I downloaded)b) How do I build the dll( modulepass) so that I can pass it to optimizer or other llvm tool.c) To test, I need to compile a test C code, emit llvm intermediate code and pass it to optimizer so that it can run my
2009 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 61, Issue 25
Hello, Lance
>Your comment regarding gnuwin32 not being needed is interesting -
>I actually installed gnu bison/flex to get past an earlier crash in
>configure.
Which version of LLVM you're building?
> (c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.3/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.ex
mingw32 gcc 4.x should be considered as 'alpha'. 3.4.5 is known to be stable.
This might give you the
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed:
$ flex --version
flex version 2.5.4
$ bison --version
bison (GNU Bison) 2.3
Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Should that work,
2008 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed:
WinGNU32 Flex and Bison are the ones to use with LLVM and Visual Studio.
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/
The LLVM Visual Studio .sln file is for Visual Studio 2003 so will require
conversion and some minor modification.
Aaron
> Should that work, assuming they're on the PATH? When I ran the build from
> inside VS, I get some
2008 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
More on this:
Walking through the projects slowly:
(*) "Configure" builds with no problem.
(*) "support" fails:
C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32>msbuild llvm.sln /t:Build
Microsoft (R) Build Engine Version 2.0.50727.1433
[Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0.50727.1433]
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2005. All rights reserved.
Build started 2/18/2008 12:07:45 AM.
2008 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues
Greetings,
I seem to be butting up against what may be a Vista-related issue for mingw-based compilation. I did some googling earlier today and found these steps: http://blogs.tedneward.com/2008/02/24/Building+LLVM+On+Windows+Using+MinGW32.aspx, which I followed. But try as I did, I couldn't seem to get past the "tools" section of the compilation. It seemed to always have
2008 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for
certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln file
under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is configured
to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside the
solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but that's probably
not the best way
2008 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>There's a config.h file in the win32 subdirectory that implies that
it's
>supposed to be concatenated as part of the build process, but it
doesn't
>seem like that's happening from within the .sln script--am I missing a
>pre-build step someplace?
When config.h.in is hit in the build of configure the configure project,
the configure.h file from the win32 directory is
2008 Feb 13
2
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I simply found it at:
http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/
Seung
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800
>From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com>
>Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>
>I'm sorry,
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5
seconds once I was back online.
Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to
configuration: can't find windows.h and so forth. Where (or to whom) is the
best place to report these and iterate until we fix them?
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking,
2006 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4 & mingw32
Hello, Everyone.
This is just brief description on building llvm-gcc4 with mingw32.
It's definitely non error-free and contains many "hacks", which should
be eliminated in the future.
1. Prerequisites
We're building in the folowing configuration:
1.1 GCC 3.4.5:
gcc -v
Reading specs from f:/research/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs
Configured with:
2007 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] Noob questions about setting up on Win32
Here's an equally dumb question: the wiki page you mention suggests
installing bison and flex and a few other packages. But I don't see these
packages anywhere on the Sourceforge MinGW page; do I get them from
elsewhere, and then build them using MinGW's gcc?
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -----Original
2008 Feb 13
1
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
If you are using the Express versions of Visual Studio, the Platform
SDK(windows.h) is a seperate install that you have to download.
Kevin Tew
Ted Neward wrote:
> Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5
> seconds once I was back online.
>
> Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to
> configuration:
2009 May 04
1
[LLVMdev] configure problems under msys
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">hi anton,<br>
<br>
i upgrade my
2008 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe
Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you
may not need that. I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the getgnuwin32
folks. I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
already have everything.
You will need to have the executables in your path.
I build with VisualStudio 2k5
2008 Feb 13
4
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks for your comment.
I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where
2006 Apr 29
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM under Mingw. Part I: tools-only
Hello, Everyone.
Now I have some spare time and I've decided to build LLVM on Mingw.
I've grab the latest 1.7 release (not CVS snapshot). Here are some
issues fixed during the build. Now I'm preparing gcc build. So, I
think, there will some other "parts"
1. Prerequisites
1.1 GCC 3.4.5 from mingw.org site.
$ gcc --version
gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.5 (mingw special)
Copyright (C)