Seung Jae Lee
2008-Feb-13 05:19 UTC
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I simply found it at: http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ Seung ---- Original message ---->Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800 >From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >I'm sorry, what is getgnuwin32? Is this just a cygwin shortcut tool? > >If I have most of the cygwin dev packages downloaded already, do I still >need getgnuwin32? > >Where do I find getgnuwin32, in any event? > >Ted Neward >Java, .NET, XML Services >Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >http://www.tedneward.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:21 PM >> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio >> 2005? >> >> Hola Seung, >> >> I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked. I updated the 2.2 win32 >> vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building. >> You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed. I used >> the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine. >> >> Good luck. >> >> Chuck. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee >> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio >> 2005? >> >> Hello all, >> >> Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >> I did but not succeed due to some build errors. >> I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled on >> VS2005 >> so I wonder... >> Have a good night. >> >> Thx, >> Seung >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: >> 2/11/2008 8:16 AM >> > >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: 2/11/2008 >8:16 AM > > >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Ted Neward
2008-Feb-13 11:16 UTC
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5 seconds once I was back online. Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to configuration: can't find windows.h and so forth. Where (or to whom) is the best place to report these and iterate until we fix them? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:20 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio > 2005? > > I simply found it at: > > http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ > > Seung > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800 > >From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com> > >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual > Studio 2005? > >To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > > >I'm sorry, what is getgnuwin32? Is this just a cygwin shortcut tool? > > > >If I have most of the cygwin dev packages downloaded already, do I > still > >need getgnuwin32? > > > >Where do I find getgnuwin32, in any event? > > > >Ted Neward > >Java, .NET, XML Services > >Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > >http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev- > bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > >> On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:21 PM > >> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List > >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual > Studio > >> 2005? > >> > >> Hola Seung, > >> > >> I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked. I updated the 2.2 win32 > >> vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building. > >> You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed. I > used > >> the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine. > >> > >> Good luck. > >> > >> Chuck. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev- > bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > >> On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee > >> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM > >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio > >> 2005? > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? > >> I did but not succeed due to some build errors. > >> I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled on > >> VS2005 > >> so I wonder... > >> Have a good night. > >> > >> Thx, > >> Seung > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailing list > >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailing list > >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: > >> 2/11/2008 8:16 AM > >> > > > >No virus found in this outgoing message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: > 2/11/2008 > >8:16 AM > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >LLVM Developers mailing list > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: > 2/11/2008 8:16 AM >No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: 2/11/2008 8:16 AM
Kevin Tew
2008-Feb-13 13:52 UTC
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
If you are using the Express versions of Visual Studio, the Platform SDK(windows.h) is a seperate install that you have to download. Kevin Tew Ted Neward wrote:> Thanks--I was offline when I wrote it, couldn't Google. Found it in about 5 > seconds once I was back online. > > Second question: I'm getting various build errors relating (it seems) to > configuration: can't find windows.h and so forth. Where (or to whom) is the > best place to report these and iterate until we fix them? > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:20 PM >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio >> 2005? >> >> I simply found it at: >> >> http://getgnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ >> >> Seung >> >> ---- Original message ---- >> >>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:11:04 -0800 >>> From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com> >>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual >>> >> Studio 2005? >> >>> To: "'LLVM Developers Mailing List'" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >>> >>> I'm sorry, what is getgnuwin32? Is this just a cygwin shortcut tool? >>> >>> If I have most of the cygwin dev packages downloaded already, do I >>> >> still >> >>> need getgnuwin32? >>> >>> Where do I find getgnuwin32, in any event? >>> >>> Ted Neward >>> Java, .NET, XML Services >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>> http://www.tedneward.com >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev- >>>> >> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> >>>> On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:21 PM >>>> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List >>>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual >>>> >> Studio >> >>>> 2005? >>>> >>>> Hola Seung, >>>> >>>> I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked. I updated the 2.2 win32 >>>> vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building. >>>> You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed. I >>>> >> used >> >>>> the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine. >>>> >>>> Good luck. >>>> >>>> Chuck. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev- >>>> >> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> >>>> On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee >>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM >>>> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >>>> Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio >>>> 2005? >>>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >>>> I did but not succeed due to some build errors. >>>> I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled on >>>> VS2005 >>>> so I wonder... >>>> Have a good night. >>>> >>>> Thx, >>>> Seung >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: >>>> 2/11/2008 8:16 AM >>>> >>>> >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: >>> >> 2/11/2008 >> >>> 8:16 AM >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: >> 2/11/2008 8:16 AM >> >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1271 - Release Date: 2/11/2008 > 8:16 AM > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080213/5031f3b6/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?