thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? [Feb 2008]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Ted Neward

2008-Feb-18 07:40 UTC

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for
certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln file
under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is configured
to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside the
solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but that's
probably
not the best way to do this.

Chuck (assuming it was you), would it not be easier for me to capture the
full results of an "msbuild llvm.sln" from the console for you?

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 > -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:52 AM
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio
> 2005?
> 
> I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe
> Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you
> may not need that.  I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the
> getgnuwin32
> folks.  I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
> already have everything.
> 
> You will need to have the executables in your path.
> 
> I build with VisualStudio 2k5 Professional with VStudio SP1 installed.
> I typically work on Vista32 or Vista64, but have compiled on XP as
> well.
> 
> 
> I don't know how up to date the LLVM docs related to Visual Studio
> compilation are.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chuck.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:52 PM
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio
> 2005?
> 
> Thanks for your comment.
> I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on
> VS2005.
> (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
> 
> I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of
> compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc
> says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have
> bison and/or flex installed where Visual Studio can find them.
> Otherwise, you do not need them and the pre-generated files that come
> with the source tree will be used."
> 
> One of errors of mine is as follows:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> 7>llvmAsmParser.cpp
> 7>c1xx : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file:
> '.\llvmAsmParser.cpp': No such file or directory
> ...
> -------------------------------------------------------
> where llvmAsmParser.cpp is related to Bison so I am compelled to feel
> to
> try installing flex/bison on my machine, anyway.
> 
> Forgive my ignorance, could you briefly tell me about that?
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Seung
> 
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:20:59 -0800
> >From: "Chuck Rose III" <cfr at adobe.com>
> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> Studio
> 2005?
> >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at
cs.uiuc.edu>
> >
> >Hola Seung,
> >
> >I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked.  I updated the 2.2 win32
> >vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be building.
> >You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed.  I
> used
> >the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine.
> >
> >Good luck.
> >
> >Chuck.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> >On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> >Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM
> >To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio
> >2005?
> >
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
> >I did but not succeed due to some build errors.
> >I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled on
> VS2005
> >so I wonder...
> >Have a good night.
> >
> >Thx,
> >Seung
> >_______________________________________________
> >LLVM Developers mailing list
> >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >LLVM Developers mailing list
> >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1276 - Release Date:
> 2/13/2008 9:41 AM
> 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM

Ted Neward

2008-Feb-18 08:11 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

More on this:

Walking through the projects slowly:

(*) "Configure" builds with no problem.
(*) "support" fails:


C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32>msbuild llvm.sln /t:Build
Microsoft (R) Build Engine Version 2.0.50727.1433
[Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0.50727.1433]
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2005. All rights reserved.

Build started 2/18/2008 12:07:45 AM.
__________________________________________________
Project "C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\llvm.sln" (Build target(s)):

Target ValidateSolutionConfiguration:
    Building solution configuration "Debug|Win32".
Target Build:
    Target Configure:
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackag
es\vcbuild.exe C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\Configure\Configure.vcproj
"Config
ure|Win32"
    Target support:
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackag
es\vcbuild.exe
C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\Support\Support.tmp_Debug_Win32.vc
proj "Debug|Win32"
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsInf.cpp(46): error C3861: 'isinf':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsInf.cpp(47): error C3861: 'isinf':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsNAN.cpp(31): error C3861: 'isnan':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsNAN.cpp(32): error C3861: 'isnan':
identifier
not fo
und
    Done building target "support" in project "llvm.sln" --
FAILED.


It looks like there's some kind of configuration that's failing here,
because for some reason IsInf.cpp thinks that my machine has isinf()
defined, when in fact there isn't any. It seems that some #defines in
config.h in include/llvm/Config are controlling this:


/* Set to 1 if the isinf function is found in <math.h> */
#define HAVE_ISINF_IN_MATH_H 1

/* Set to 1 if the isnan function is found in <cmath> */
/* #undef HAVE_ISNAN_IN_CMATH */

/* Set to 1 if the isnan function is found in <math.h> */
#define HAVE_ISNAN_IN_MATH_H 1


But I'm guessing that somehow this is supposed to be manipulated by the
build process, not by hand. Am I wrong in this?

There's a config.h file in the win32 subdirectory that implies that it's
supposed to be concatenated as part of the build process, but it doesn't
seem like that's happening from within the .sln script--am I missing a
pre-build step someplace?

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Ted Neward
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:41 PM
> To: 'LLVM Developers Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio
> 2005?
> 
> By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for
> certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln
> file
> under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is
> configured
> to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside
> the
> solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but
that's
> probably
> not the best way to do this.
> 
> Chuck (assuming it was you), would it not be easier for me to capture
> the
> full results of an "msbuild llvm.sln" from the console for you?
> 
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:52 AM
> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> Studio
> > 2005?
> >
> > I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I
> believe
> > Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you
> > may not need that.  I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the
> > getgnuwin32
> > folks.  I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
> > already have everything.
> >
> > You will need to have the executables in your path.
> >
> > I build with VisualStudio 2k5 Professional with VStudio SP1
> installed.
> > I typically work on Vista32 or Vista64, but have compiled on XP as
> > well.
> >
> >
> > I don't know how up to date the LLVM docs related to Visual Studio
> > compilation are.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chuck.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:52 PM
> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> Studio
> > 2005?
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on
> > VS2005.
> > (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
> >
> > I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of
> > compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM
> doc
> > says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to
have
> > bison and/or flex installed where Visual Studio can find them.
> > Otherwise, you do not need them and the pre-generated files that come
> > with the source tree will be used."
> >
> > One of errors of mine is as follows:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > ...
> > 7>llvmAsmParser.cpp
> > 7>c1xx : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file:
> > '.\llvmAsmParser.cpp': No such file or directory
> > ...
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > where llvmAsmParser.cpp is related to Bison so I am compelled to feel
> > to
> > try installing flex/bison on my machine, anyway.
> >
> > Forgive my ignorance, could you briefly tell me about that?
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Seung
> >
> > ---- Original message ----
> > >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:20:59 -0800
> > >From: "Chuck Rose III" <cfr at adobe.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> > Studio
> > 2005?
> > >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at
cs.uiuc.edu>
> > >
> > >Hola Seung,
> > >
> > >I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked.  I updated the 2.2
win32
> > >vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be
building.
> > >You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed.  I
> > used
> > >the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine.
> > >
> > >Good luck.
> > >
> > >Chuck.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > >On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> > >Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM
> > >To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > >Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
Studio
> > >2005?
> > >
> > >Hello all,
> > >
> > >Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
> > >I did but not succeed due to some build errors.
> > >I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled
on
> > VS2005
> > >so I wonder...
> > >Have a good night.
> > >
> > >Thx,
> > >Seung
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >LLVM Developers mailing list
> > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >LLVM Developers mailing list
> > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1276 - Release Date:
> > 2/13/2008 9:41 AM
> >
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2008
> 2:39 PM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2008 2:39 PM
> 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date: 2/17/2008
2:39 PM

Chuck Rose III

2008-Feb-18 19:57 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

>There's a config.h file in the win32 subdirectory that implies that
it's>supposed to be concatenated as part of the build process, but it
doesn't>seem like that's happening from within the .sln script--am I missing a
>pre-build step someplace?
When config.h.in is hit in the build of configure the configure project,
the configure.h file from the win32 directory is copied to main
llvm\Config\Config.h.  The script in the sln file is: 

copy "$(InputPath)"+"$(SolutionDir)config.h"
"$(ProjectDir)..\llvm\Config\config.h"

configured as a custom build step in the solution file.  Is that not
firing from the command line compilation of the sln?

The file in the win32 directory is the config.h file that's ultimately
used when compiling everything under VStudio.  That it implies that it
concatenates is outdated information.  Ditto for the other .in files in
configure.  We should probably be doing something more clever here.

Thanks,
Chuck.


-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Ted Neward
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:12 AM
To: 'LLVM Developers Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio
2005?

More on this:

Walking through the projects slowly:

(*) "Configure" builds with no problem.
(*) "support" fails:


C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32>msbuild llvm.sln /t:Build
Microsoft (R) Build Engine Version 2.0.50727.1433
[Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0.50727.1433]
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2005. All rights reserved.

Build started 2/18/2008 12:07:45 AM.
__________________________________________________
Project "C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\llvm.sln" (Build target(s)):

Target ValidateSolutionConfiguration:
    Building solution configuration "Debug|Win32".
Target Build:
    Target Configure:
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackag
es\vcbuild.exe C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\Configure\Configure.vcproj
"Config
ure|Win32"
    Target support:
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\Common7\IDE\..\..\vc\vcpackag
es\vcbuild.exe
C:\Prg\llvm-2.2\llvm-2.2\win32\Support\Support.tmp_Debug_Win32.vc
proj "Debug|Win32"
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsInf.cpp(46): error C3861: 'isinf':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsInf.cpp(47): error C3861: 'isinf':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsNAN.cpp(31): error C3861: 'isnan':
identifier
not fo
und
        ..\..\lib\Support\IsNAN.cpp(32): error C3861: 'isnan':
identifier
not fo
und
    Done building target "support" in project "llvm.sln" --
FAILED.


It looks like there's some kind of configuration that's failing here,
because for some reason IsInf.cpp thinks that my machine has isinf()
defined, when in fact there isn't any. It seems that some #defines in
config.h in include/llvm/Config are controlling this:


/* Set to 1 if the isinf function is found in <math.h> */
#define HAVE_ISINF_IN_MATH_H 1

/* Set to 1 if the isnan function is found in <cmath> */
/* #undef HAVE_ISNAN_IN_CMATH */

/* Set to 1 if the isnan function is found in <math.h> */
#define HAVE_ISNAN_IN_MATH_H 1


But I'm guessing that somehow this is supposed to be manipulated by the
build process, not by hand. Am I wrong in this?

There's a config.h file in the win32 subdirectory that implies that it's
supposed to be concatenated as part of the build process, but it doesn't
seem like that's happening from within the .sln script--am I missing a
pre-build step someplace?

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Ted Neward
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:41 PM
> To: 'LLVM Developers Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
Studio> 2005?
> 
> By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for
> certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln
> file
> under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is
> configured
> to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects
inside> the
> solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but
that's
> probably
> not the best way to do this.
> 
> Chuck (assuming it was you), would it not be easier for me to capture
> the
> full results of an "msbuild llvm.sln" from the console for you?
> 
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Chuck Rose III
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:52 AM
> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> Studio
> > 2005?
> >
> > I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I
> believe
> > Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so
you> > may not need that.  I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the
> > getgnuwin32
> > folks.  I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably
> > already have everything.
> >
> > You will need to have the executables in your path.
> >
> > I build with VisualStudio 2k5 Professional with VStudio SP1
> installed.
> > I typically work on Vista32 or Vista64, but have compiled on XP as
> > well.
> >
> >
> > I don't know how up to date the LLVM docs related to Visual Studio
> > compilation are.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chuck.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:52 PM
> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> Studio
> > 2005?
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on
> > VS2005.
> > (I didn't modify anything before the compilation)
> >
> > I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of
> > compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM
> doc
> > says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to
have> > bison and/or flex installed where Visual Studio can find them.
> > Otherwise, you do not need them and the pre-generated files that
come> > with the source tree will be used."
> >
> > One of errors of mine is as follows:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > ...
> > 7>llvmAsmParser.cpp
> > 7>c1xx : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file:
> > '.\llvmAsmParser.cpp': No such file or directory
> > ...
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > where llvmAsmParser.cpp is related to Bison so I am compelled to
feel> > to
> > try installing flex/bison on my machine, anyway.
> >
> > Forgive my ignorance, could you briefly tell me about that?
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Seung
> >
> > ---- Original message ----
> > >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:20:59 -0800
> > >From: "Chuck Rose III" <cfr at adobe.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
> > Studio
> > 2005?
> > >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at
cs.uiuc.edu>
> > >
> > >Hola Seung,
> > >
> > >I don't know if 2.1 in particular worked.  I updated the 2.2
win32
> > >vstudio 2k5 files right before lockdown, so they should be
building.> > >You will need appropriate versions of flex and bison installed.  I
> > used
> > >the ones from getgnuwin32 on my machine.
> > >
> > >Good luck.
> > >
> > >Chuck.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> > >On Behalf Of Seung Jae Lee
> > >Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:05 PM
> > >To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > >Subject: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual
Studio
> > >2005?
> > >
> > >Hello all,
> > >
> > >Is there anyone has tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
> > >I did but not succeed due to some build errors.
> > >I seem to remember I read somewhere on this list it's compiled
on
> > VS2005
> > >so I wonder...
> > >Have a good night.
> > >
> > >Thx,
> > >Seung
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >LLVM Developers mailing list
> > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >LLVM Developers mailing list
> > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1276 - Release Date:
> > 2/13/2008 9:41 AM
> >
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2008
> 2:39 PM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date:
> 2/17/2008 2:39 PM
> 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.7/1284 - Release Date:
2/17/2008
2:39 PM
 

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Apparently Analagous Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

llvm dev - Feb 2008 - [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?

Apparently Analagous Threads