similar to: [LLVMdev] -arch option ignored?

Thanks for the hint, Devang. On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > You need to build darwin driver to use -arch. Try using build_gcc > script to configure and build llvm-gcc. Well, I guess this task exceeds my expertise. I just thought there was some obvious mistake I made because a lot of people might be using llvm-gcc4 as a drop-in to Apple's gcc to build multi-

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Leo Fink wrote: >> You need to build darwin driver to use -arch. Try using build_gcc >> script to configure and build llvm-gcc. > > Well, I guess this task exceeds my expertise. I just thought there > was some obvious mistake I made because a lot of people might be > using llvm-gcc4 as a drop-in to Apple's gcc to build multi- > architecture

On Jul 6, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Leo Fink wrote: > Built like this, llvm-gcc generates ppc code regardless of the -arch > flag (e.g. arch i386). > > What can I do to make it behave like Apple's gcc in this matter? You need to build darwin driver to use -arch. Try using build_gcc script to configure and build llvm-gcc. - Devang

On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Leo Fink wrote: >>> You need to build darwin driver to use -arch. Try using build_gcc >>> script to configure and build llvm-gcc. >> >> Well, I guess this task exceeds my expertise. I just thought there >> was some obvious mistake I made because a lot of people might be >> using

Hello, I've put together a macports version of llvm and llvm-gcc4, but I've run into a problem with how gcc on the mac works. llvm-gcc4 creates an executable named: /opt/local/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 Which happens to be the same executable in /usr/bin. Because I have /opt/local before /usr/bin, gcc ends up using llvm-gcc4 to build all my code. Most of the time this

On Sep 19, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > > In llvm-backend.cpp : > > 1086 if (GV->getName() != Name) { > 1087 Function *F = TheModule->getFunction(Name); > 1088 assert(F && F->isDeclaration() && "A function turned > into a global?"); > 1089

On 19 Sep 2007, at 21:51, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try >> again and post the results > > Yeah, that should work. Indeed it did. llvm-gcc now builds fine. (llvm and llvm-gcc at Revision: 42148) haven't run the test-suite or test yet - need sleep - good night my configure flags in case anyone wonders:

Hi, I'm guessing that no one has tried this exact combination yet. I'm trying to build the gcc4.2 front end with current LLVM SVN on a G4 Powerbook running 10.4.10. I started with this: ../gcc4.2-trunk/configure --prefix=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-gcc-4-2/install --enable-llvm=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-svn-obj/ --with-gmp=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-gcc-4-2/libdeps

Hi all, building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a bug? /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/

On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi all, > building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm > (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following > message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a > bug? I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly. >

Hi all, I'm developing an application on Mac OS X Darwin which embeds R. However, the application always crashes due to the C stack checking. I know that R_CStackLimit can be set to -1 to disable the stack checking, but I don't know where to put the code "R_CStackLimit=-1". Please give some instructions. Thank you very much! Here is my compiler infomation: $g++ -v Using

i'm building dovecot 1.1.beta9 on both osx 10.4.11 osx 10.5.1 using Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8 Configured with: /Builds/apple/gcc_42-5531/obj/src/configure --disable-checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++ --program-transform-name=/^[cg][^.-]*$/s/$/-4.2/ --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.0.0

On Apr 21, 10:59 pm, "Tanya M. Lattner" <to... at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Gabor Greif wrote: > > Hi all, > > > can anybody confirm that llvm-gcc is broken? > > It builds for me on x86, darwin8 (svn rev: 50048). What are you using to > configure it? This is what gcc/config.log remembered: $ /Users/ggreif/llvm-gcc/gcc/configure

I'm trying to run Wine 0.9.20 under OS X x86 and I'm getting nothing but "Bus Error" when I run any win32 program via Wine. Here is some relevant environment info: OS: Mac OS X 10.4.7 Xcode: Xcode 2.4 X11: XFree86 Version 4.4.0 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) gcc -v: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin8 Configured with:

I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, building OPENSSH v4.3p2 on OSX 10.4.7, all's fine (config, nake, install, exec) out-of-the-box. so, to be clear, this is NOT a blocker, by any stretch ... that said, however ... if, instead of a don't-monkey-with-it build, prior to ./configure, i: autoreconf -i -f then, a subsequent: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/openssh \

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>

On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Bob Wilson wrote: > The -arch option is handled by Apple's "driver-driver", and the MacPorts build is probably not using that. See the driverdriver.c source file in llvm-gcc for details. > He's asking about the -march option which should work either way. Also, the driver-driver should be in the sources that they're using even still.

I can configure it now. Thank You! --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Configure problem of llvm2.5 in Mac OS X 10.4.11 To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 6:26 PM Hi Murat, This looks suspicious:  

So my original post subject was for -march, but that was my mistake. The command line option is -arch. Since presumably Macports is just fetching an llvm tar ball from some repository, is the issue that llvm has been misconfigure in some obvious way? Yes, I can take a look at the driverdriver.c source file as well. Should this also be working in LLVM 2.9 or is the latest SVN also needed? On