similar to: [LLVMdev] PATCH (dubious changes) "Bytecode" --> "Bitcode"

Hi All, I have a questions about associative list mappings in R, and if they are possible? I have data in the form show below, and want to make a new 'bucket' variable called combined. Which is the sum of the control and the exposed metric values This combined variable is a many to many matching as values only appear in the file if they have a value > 0. conversion.type filteredID

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > ... except that Warren’s proposal that started this discussion seems to imply that he > > has a use case that requires reciprocals to be turned off separately. > > Just to close this loose end, yes I have a use case. > > Specifically, we have a customer that turns on

Now that we have a "-why" option to the GenLibDeps.pl utility (which is used by llvm-config to deduce library dependencies), a review of the output has led to a few dubious library dependencies. Here they are: All of the following dependencies are singletons (the dependent library depends on only a single symbol from the dependency library): libLLVMCodeGen.a:

I don’t really like the idea of updating checks of UnsafeAlgebra() to depend on all of the other flags. It seems like it would be preferable to look at each optimization and figure out which flags it actually requires. I suspect that in many cases the “new” flag (i.e. allowing reassociation, etc.) will be what is actually needed anyway. I would be inclined to agree with Niolai’s suggestion of

Hi, Thanks for the quick feedback. I see your points, but I have a few questions/comments. I'll start at the end of the previous post: > ... > I think these are valuable problems to solve, but you should tackle them piece by piece: > > 1) the clang part of overriding the individual FMF and emitting the right IR is the first thing to fix. > 2) the backend is still using the

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 4.8 box connected to the net which until recently hasn't had any problems. Today DNS lookups mysteriously stopped working (the box has tinydns & dnscache installed to handle dns requests). I noticed some strange things while checking the problem with tcpdump. Tcpdump appears not to show any traffic whatsoever on either my external interface or internal lan interface,

In llvm/lib/MC/MachObjectWriter.cpp, there's assert(OS.tell() - Start == is64Bit() ? macho::Header64Size : macho::Header32Size); Shouldn't that be assert(OS.tell() - Start == (is64Bit() ? macho::Header64Size : macho::Header32Size)); MSVC emits a warning, and it doesn't seem right to compare a boolean with a difference of two integers. Csaba -- GCS a+

Hi, I'm running openssh-2.3.0p1 under Tru64 4.0. I've got the sources and built it whithout additional options. The `problem' happens when a login from a non-existing user is attempted: $ ssh bogus at foo.com Connection closed by foo.com It doesn't even ask the password. So anyone can test whether this host has a user called bogus. I'm not sure whether this is a bug, but I

------- Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Dubious use of BN_num_bits in sshconnect1.c From: Niels Provos <provos at citi.umich.edu> In-Reply-To: alex at foogod.com, Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:38:56 PST To: alex at foogod.com Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:07:24 -0500 Sender: provos at citi.umich.edu Hi Alex, there is no problem in OpenSSH. In message

Hiho... I have recently encountered problems using OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 to connect to a SSH 1.2.20 server, with messages such as the following: Warning: Server lies about size of server public key: actual size is 1151 bits vs. announced 1152. Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh. respond_to_rsa_challenge: public_key 1151 < host_key 1024 + SSH_KEY_BITS_RESERVED 128

I need ssh-add to fail cleanly if it tries and fails to read a key, rather than prompting the user. I can't seem to figure out how to do that. This is on a Linux 2.6.26 system, running OpenSSH 5.1p1 (as built on debian lenny/sid) First, the things i've tried: * i've unset the DISPLAY and SSH_ASKPASS environment variables, so no X11-style prompting should happen. * i've

Hello world, I'm trying to do an anova on data in data.set, dependent variable is a column named "dep.var", grouping variable is in a column called "indep.var", and is.factor(indep.var) is TRUE... why can't I just do aov(dep.var ~ indep.var, data = data.set)? What have I done to deserve this?! What gives? Am I missing something totlly obvious? R-base-1.0.0-1,

Hi useRs! I would like to know how to make aggregated data.frame with aggregate() tabulated. For example, I run the following command to aggregate re with respect to group1 and group2. > (aggr <- with(final, aggregate(re, group1, group2, mean))) Group.1 Group.2 x 1 1992 15 0.16392 2 1993 15 0.15467 3 1994 15 0.15456 4 1995 15 0.15391

I'm using a very long irregular time-series of air temperature and relative humidity of this kind (this is an extract only) its.format("% Y%d%m %X) > base T H 20020601 12.00.00 27.1 47 20020601 15.00.00 29.1 39 20020601 18.00.00 27.4 39 20020601 21.00.00 24.0 40 20020602 0.00.00 22.0 73 20020602 3.00.00 19.2 49 20020602 6.00.00 19.5 74 20020602

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when

Dear all, I initially ran into this problem while rebuilding a package dependent on nleqslv. I got the following error: Error in match.arg(global) : 'arg' must be of length 1 This didn't occur in previous versions of nleqslv, but did in the current one (2.4). I think I pinned the problem down to the following example: Take two functions: test <-

Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb

Author: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 957d30a3607ed9f3cbe490da5894d1e1b2104033 Total changesets: 28 Log message: resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916 Files: usr/src/Makefile.lint usr/src/Targetdirs usr/src/cmd/Makefile usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd usr/src/cmd/acctadm/Makefile usr/src/cmd/acctadm/acctadm.xcl

>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical

On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these