similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 1.9 now in FreeBSD ports

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:13:30PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Everyone. > > As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently > we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of > "packages" for different distributions. I'd like to announce that the FreeBSD ports devel/llvm and lang/llvm-gcc4 have

> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make >> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. >> >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > Both llvm and

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > The "make check" produced: > === Summary === > > # of expected passes 2209 > # of unexpected failures 41 > # of expected failures 5 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' > gmake: ***

Hello, Everyone. As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of "packages" for different distributions. It might not be convenient to compile LLVM from source, because of broken gcc's supplied in binary packages for many distributions (for example, many Ubuntu's still

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:38:36PM -0700, Scott Michel wrote: > There should also be a large notice in 40 point font and bold that says, > "gcc4 does not produce byte code by default: you must use the -emit-llvm > flag to get LLVM byte code." =) Where -is- that documented? The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come up on the list. =) (Which

On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > Where -is- that documented? > > The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come > up on the list. =) http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html ? ... Example with llvm-gcc4 First, create a simple C file, name it 'hello.c': #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("hello

I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ into LLVM bytecode: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) A simple test program, x.cpp: #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp $ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o $ lli out.bc Segmentation fault (core

More bison woes. llvm-2.1 + the patch Chris mentioned builds without bison, but llvm-gcc4 doesn't: /home/emil/ll/llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/missing bison -d -o gengtype-yacc.c ../../llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/gcc/gengtype-yacc.y WARNING: `bison' missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.y' file. You may need the `Bison' package in order for

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:11:51PM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > >> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make > >> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. > >> > >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with

I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/ If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please download the appropriate tarballs from the website. Here are a few ways you can help test this release: 1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check. 2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: Can you try it again without bison with these files:

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } > > $

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got:

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make > ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. > > It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in

Emil, > # of expected passes 2243 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 5 Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is failing now. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:36:39PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Emil, > > > # of expected passes 2243 > > # of unexpected failures 7 > > # of expected failures 5 > > Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is > failing now. Sure: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-armfix.txt I think

I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:

Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If it's available please where could I download it from? Thanks. Napi

On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Tanya Lattner wrote: >> LLVMers, >> >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > A couple months ago, I had a problem packaging llvm-gcc for macports > because one of the binaries from llvm-gcc was somehow getting used by > Apple's gcc