similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM under MS VC++ 2005

I missed two files from the LLVM source code proper. These need reviewing and commiting. They are trivial changes that should not influence any other builds. Basically these functions are missing a return statement which Visual Studio 2005 Beta flags as an error rather than as a warning. I have put in dummy constructors in return statements to allow CodeGen and Target libraries to build. The

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:41:41PM -0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > I missed two files from the LLVM source code proper. These need > reviewing and commiting. They are trivial changes that should not > influence any other builds. Basically these functions are missing a > return statement which Visual Studio 2005 Beta flags as an error > rather than as a warning. I have put in dummy

Could someone please apply this patch to the Win32 support so that Morten and Jeff can handle the recent changes? I can't do it because I"m on the road with only email access. Thanks, Reid. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: Morten Ofstad <morten at hue.no> > To: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> > Subject: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files > Date: Thu,

Hello The current svn revision fails to compile on windows using Visual Studio 2008. I'm getting: 3>f:\dev\llvm\lib\codegen\asmprinter\dwarfwriter.cpp(1167) : error C4716: 'llvm::DbgScope::getLine' : must return a value 3>f:\dev\llvm\lib\codegen\asmprinter\dwarfwriter.cpp(1168) : error C4716: 'llvm::DbgScope::getColumn' : must return a value

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Could someone please apply this patch to the Win32 support so that > Morten and Jeff can handle the recent changes? I can't do it because > I"m on the road with only email access. I'd be happy to do it. Can someone send me the patch as an attachment off-list? -Chris > > <Tool > >

I tried to compile FLAC on Windows (the winamp2 plugin as a test) and I encoutered a problem. The stat() function and the associated structure doesn't exist on Windows (Visual Studio 5/6). But _stat and the structure with the same name does exist. So would it be possible to change stat() and struct stat ? I did the following in the code : #define STAT(x,y) _stat(x,y) typedef struct stat

Hi, I'm looking for some pointers on how to troubleshoot this problem. I'm trying to write a backend for the AVR. There is an undefined reference at line 48 which is the line FrameInfo() is on. I've tried to use the MSP430 and other targets as references so I'm not sure what changes I did would cause a problem on this line? AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(const Target &T,

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > The TargetFrameInfo, amoung other things, specifies "local area offset" > > -- which, as comment say, is: > > > > the offset of the local area from the stack pointer on entrance to a > > function. > > > > The question is -- what's local area? Is this the first stack

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > The X86 backend has this code: > > X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(const Module &M, IntrinsicLowering *IL) > : .... > FrameInfo(TargetFrameInfo::StackGrowsDown, 8/*16 for SSE*/, 4), > > That is, it uses "4" as local area offset. Based on prior discussion this > should mean that the local

Yes, unfortunately I am using the Visual C++ .NET compiler. Morten Ofstad wrote: > This problem is the motivation for having the _X86TargetMachineModule > symbol in LLVM. I thought this problem was solved by explictly list the object files in the "Additional Dependencies" of the project file? win32/llc/llc.vcproj:

The TargetFrameInfo, amoung other things, specifies "local area offset" -- which, as comment say, is: the offset of the local area from the stack pointer on entrance to a function. The question is -- what's local area? Is this the first stack location which can be used by function for allocating its own variables? - Volodya

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > The TargetFrameInfo, amoung other things, specifies "local area offset" -- > which, as comment say, is: > > the offset of the local area from the stack pointer on entrance to a > function. > > The question is -- what's local area? Is this the first stack location which > can be used by function for

The X86 backend has this code: X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(const Module &M, IntrinsicLowering *IL) : .... FrameInfo(TargetFrameInfo::StackGrowsDown, 8/*16 for SSE*/, 4), That is, it uses "4" as local area offset. Based on prior discussion this should mean that the local area starts and address ESP+4. Is this really true? On X86 stack grows down, so

Morten, I've applied these patches. Thanks for the updates! Reid. On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 01:26, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hi, > > when I updated the sources today there were several small problems that > stopped the windows version from compiling, here are the patches > > m. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Index:

Hello... I have a very simple and tiny processor. It doesn't support procedule call. Do I still need to add the code about TargetFrameInfo and implement the stack operations in the XXXRegisterInfo.cpp????? Thanx. Dave.

Avoids trying to create and replace version.h more than once which led to file-locking errors with multicore builds. --- Makefile.am | 1 + win32/VS2015/celt.vcxproj | 48 +++++++++++++++++--------- win32/VS2015/generate_version.vcxproj | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ win32/VS2015/opus.sln | 32 ++++++++++++++++-

Sigh. I ask for your indulgence yet again. I installed Ninja and deleted my old build tree. When I run CMake now, I'm told that it can't find the compilers and assembler. So, of course, I need to put a compiler toolset on my path. I tried MinGW but was instantly reminded that it doesn't have localtime_s. So I tried to find the Visual Studio binaries and located four different

Hi! I want to use LLVM for my own "pet" programming language compiler as a backend. Currently it generates C code, but I am not satisfied with this approach as generating high-level C (with proper type declarations!) is horrible. So here are my questions/problems with LLVM: 1.) Are there operations that add, sub, mul integers with overflow checking? How much work would it be to add

June Status Update ------------------ Hi everyone, Since the last status update, we've had a lot of progress on various fronts. In particular, we passed the 15,000th commit to the llvm-commits list, we have some great new features and documentation, new people using LLVM, and (strangely enough) the MachineBasicBlock class seems to have received a lot of love. At this point, I'm

Hello All, I just svn update % svn info . Path: . URL: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk Repository Root: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project Repository UUID: 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 Revision: 54012 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: wangmp Last Changed Rev: 54007 Last Changed Date: 2008-07-25 03:30:26 +0200 (Fri, 25 Jul 2008) make[3]: Entering