similar to: [LLVMdev] Nested functions

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Dirk Muysers wrote: > Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of nested > functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm? This was discussed back in August, which discusses it, provides a solution and an example: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/001828.html

On Nov 21, 2004, at 4:11 AM, Dirk Muysers wrote: > Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of > nested > functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm? > > Dirk Muysers. I have not seen a discussion of this and none of our current front-ends need it. A straightforward way to add support for this would be: (a) Lower nested procedures into

> As an optimization for shallow nested functions (e.g., 3 levels or less), > it seems to me you could just avoid the stack walking entirely and add > $k-1$ arguments to each function at level $k$, i.e., at most 2 arguments > in all. This may even be an easy first implementation. I use this method with filtering unused in nested function args and local vars in my YAFL frontend

On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >> As an optimization for shallow nested functions (e.g., 3 levels or >> less), it seems to me you could just avoid the stack walking entirely >> and add $k-1$ arguments to each function at level $k$, i.e., at most >> 2 arguments in all. This may even be an easy first implementation. > > I use this method

>> I use this method with filtering unused in nested function args and local >> vars >> in my YAFL frontend (not finished :(( - at this moment generate LLVM >> bytecode but doesn't have all runtime suport code writed) > > So do you mean you pass static links for parent function stack frames as > arguments? How do you generate them? > Sorry, I must more

>> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some >> modification for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and >> non-LLVM project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef >> LLVM_OBJ_ROOT/LLVM_SRC_ROOT vars). > > I'm not sure about this, perhaps Reid would like to comment? > Patch attached. This patch with header

Hi All, I'm using the following code to produce some stacked bar graphs. *setwd("C:\\Users\\Tinus\\Documents\\NMMU\\R\\Seamounts")* *SChla <- read.csv("SM_Chla_data.csv")* * * *#Extract mean values from data file* * * *Coral <- SChla[185:223,] #Reduce SChla to Coral only* *coral <- with(Coral , aggregate(cbind(Pico, Nano, Micro), list(Depth),FUN=mean))*

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >>> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some modification >>> for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and non-LLVM >>> project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef >>> LLVM_OBJ_ROOT/LLVM_SRC_ROOT vars). >> >> I'm not sure about this, perhaps Reid

I am searching for directions for using live block migration to copy running vm's to a different storage pool. Example: VM1 running on Host1, the image(s) for VM1 are stored in /var/lib/libvirt/images. I'd like to copy the disk image(s) that VM1 is using to /nfs/images. Without stopping/pausing/powering down the VM. Do you have any examples or documentation of how to accomplish this

--- nva/set_timings.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/nva/set_timings.c b/nva/set_timings.c index 7376486..985a707 100644 --- a/nva/set_timings.c +++ b/nva/set_timings.c @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ shallow_dump(struct nvamemtiming_conf *conf) if (conf->range.start == (unsigned char) -1) conf->range.start = 0; if (conf->range.end == (unsigned char) -1) -

My question is this: If you have an ongoing blockcopy (drive-mirror) of a running transient VM, and the VM kernel panics, can you restart the VM without interrupting the ongoing blockcopy? A virsh reboot won't work since if the VM is kernel panicked, its not going to respond to ACPI requests.

Let''s say I have: map.resources :teams do |team| team.resources :squads, :shallow => true end When I want to generate a form_for a squad, I need both the team and squad for new/create, but only the squad for edit. This means I need: edit: form_for(squad) new: form_for([team, squad]) This seems not very dry. Is there a more idiomatic way of doing this? Right now,

I have a question about shallow copies in R. Since R 3.1.0, subsetting a dataframe with respect to its columns no longer result in deep copies. This is an amazing change in my opinion. Now, subsetting a data.frame by rows (or subsetting a matrix by columns or rows) still does deep copies. In particular, it is my understanding that running a command on a very large subset of rows (say

Am 10.06.13 10:40, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: > On 06/10/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> Am 10.06.13 09:07, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: >>> On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> I just tried the following: >>>> >>>> virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml

Hi, i asked already a time ago about snapshots. I have some guests, each resides in a raw file, placed on an ext3 fs which is on top of a logical volume, for each guest a dedicated lv. The raw is not a "must have", if there are obvious reasons i can convert them to a qcow2. What i want is a consistent backup of each guest taken overnight. If possible i won't have downtime. I can use

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

Hi, I have a small blog application, and I would like to shorten its routes. Here they are: Blog::Application.routes.draw do resources :categories do resources :articles do resources :comments end end A rake routes command produce the following lines: GET /categories/:category_id/articles/:article_id/comments(.:format)

Hi, What's the best way to clone a Function (deep copy, not shallow)? Apparently only Instruction-classes feature a clone()-method, and there is no dedicated copy constructor/operator= for Function either. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University

Does anybody happen to know if 'for sure' the order in which you list modrewrite rules is the order in which they are processed within a .htaccess file? It does work, but I want to know that it always works. Basically, I have some multiple wildcard rules, where directories can't be hard coded and as it goes deeper into the directories, the more shallow levels interfere with the

Am Mi., 12. Dez. 2018 um 10:10 Uhr schrieb Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > > As we have seen, > > there are other reasons for loops to have identical LoopIDs. With > > patches [3,4], llvm.loop metadata can be collapsed (unlike access > > groups), thus the 'distinct' is not necessary anymore. Unfortunately, > > there is code in LLVM (and maybe